cssed-devel Mailing List for cssed (Page 4)
Brought to you by:
iagorubio
You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(73) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(185) |
Oct
(17) |
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2005 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(83) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(11) |
2006 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(6) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Xenofon G. <xgr...@ya...> - 2005-02-11 16:55:33
|
Iago Rubio wrote: >Could you please search your registry for the key >HKLM\Software\GTK\2.0\Path ? > >Is it present ? > > yap. Here is the value of the key: "C:\Programme\Common Files\GTK\2.0" So I don't think this could so wrong... And by the way the version string found in the same path of the registry is "2.4.7.0" and Revision is "a". >The pre-release package is at >http://iagorubio.com/gtk/cssed-pre-0.3.1-gtk2.4.exe > >Please uninstall the previous package to avoid clashes, even while it's >not mandatory. > > I just tried that one too, but I get the same message. Sorry, really, I don't mean spoiling your weekend. Xenofon |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-11 16:52:36
|
Le 11 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 17:48, Iago Rubio a =E9crit : > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:22, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote: >> Le 11 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 11:17, Iago Rubio a =E9crit : >> >>> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 06:19, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote: >>>> I know you are not pro that, but would you mind if I change the=20 >>>> format >>>> of doc from sgml to xml, as sgml is quite stagnant, not to mention=20= >>>> the >>>> dssl stysheets. >>>> >>>> It makes outputs more and more ugly, compared to what can be done=20= >>>> with >>>> xml/xsl/css for all formats: ps, pdf, html. >>>> >>>> This way, I can use docbook-dtd 4.4 and all its possibilities. >>> >>> Will we use the jade transformation engine on the new format ? >> No, xslt stylesheets and saxon parser. Jade is really way out of = date. > > This will add a bad dependency to build the docs, that's Java. > > I don't like to add a dependency to a non free package to build the > docs. > > Saxon have not even packages for Linux but a zip, and is not in the=20 > most > common distros. Java is free, Saxon is free. > > Are there other free software options avaiable ? For pdf output, no. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org> |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-11 16:48:12
|
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:22, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > Le 11 f=C3=A9vr. 2005, =C3=A0 11:17, Iago Rubio a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 06:19, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > >> I know you are not pro that, but would you mind if I change the format > >> of doc from sgml to xml, as sgml is quite stagnant, not to mention the > >> dssl stysheets. > >> > >> It makes outputs more and more ugly, compared to what can be done with > >> xml/xsl/css for all formats: ps, pdf, html. > >> > >> This way, I can use docbook-dtd 4.4 and all its possibilities. > > > > Will we use the jade transformation engine on the new format ? > No, xslt stylesheets and saxon parser. Jade is really way out of date. This will add a bad dependency to build the docs, that's Java. I don't like to add a dependency to a non free package to build the docs. Saxon have not even packages for Linux but a zip, and is not in the most common distros. Are there other free software options avaiable ? --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-11 16:47:38
|
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 21:54, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > Le 10 f=C3=A9vr. 2005, =C3=A0 21:28, Iago Rubio a =C3=A9crit : >=20 > > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:22, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: [snip] > >> 2 - I use the right mouse button to drag and drop > > > >> Nothing happens but the drag is performed, just not the drop. > > > > It's ok, the right button is required. > So, maybe disable it otherwise it's confusing. Yes, I should do it. It's enabled by default in the treeview, as it have some support - that I did not use - to automatic d'n'd. ITOH the drag icon is ok, and said "you cannot drop" all around. I'll take a closer look at this, to disable automatic d'n'd on the tree view. --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-11 16:47:17
|
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 11:33, Xenofon Grigoriadis wrote: > Iago Rubio wrote: >=20 > > If you want, I can upload for you a pre-release of cssed-0.3.1 that > > fixes lots of issues on windows. > > > > This way you can tell us if the problem is still present, so we could g= o > > for a fix on the new installer, instead of fixing the > > ready-to-be-obsoleted one. > > > > If you post here what version of gtk are you using, and you're willing > > to take a try to the new installer, I'll build it for you and upload it > > to a location where you could download it. > > > > Is it ok for you ? > > =20 > That's ok with me, I'd like to contribute. Thanks. > About the version of gtk: > - the install-directory is C:\Programme\Common Files\GTK\2.0\ > - the properties of the file bin\libglib-2.0-0.dll include the version=20 > string "2.4.5.0" >=20 > I hope that's the information needed. So I'll wait for the pre-release. It's useful indeed. Could you please search your registry for the key HKLM\Software\GTK\2.0\Path ? Is it present ? If you're not comfortable with the registry, I can guide you or even send you a script to search for needed values. The pre-release package is at http://iagorubio.com/gtk/cssed-pre-0.3.1-gtk2.4.exe Please uninstall the previous package to avoid clashes, even while it's not mandatory.=20 > Oh, and... you are pretty active, guys, wow... Don't think that .... we're now facing a release. Usually the list is really low traffic :) Regards. --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: Xenofon G. <xgr...@ya...> - 2005-02-11 10:33:23
|
Iago Rubio wrote: > If you want, I can upload for you a pre-release of cssed-0.3.1 that > fixes lots of issues on windows. > > This way you can tell us if the problem is still present, so we could go > for a fix on the new installer, instead of fixing the > ready-to-be-obsoleted one. > > If you post here what version of gtk are you using, and you're willing > to take a try to the new installer, I'll build it for you and upload it > to a location where you could download it. > > Is it ok for you ? > > That's ok with me, I'd like to contribute. About the version of gtk: - the install-directory is C:\Programme\Common Files\GTK\2.0\ - the properties of the file bin\libglib-2.0-0.dll include the version string "2.4.5.0" I hope that's the information needed. So I'll wait for the pre-release. Oh, and... you are pretty active, guys, wow... |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-11 10:22:34
|
Le 11 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 11:17, Iago Rubio a =E9crit : > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 06:19, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote: >> I know you are not pro that, but would you mind if I change the = format >> of doc from sgml to xml, as sgml is quite stagnant, not to mention = the >> dssl stysheets. >> >> It makes outputs more and more ugly, compared to what can be done = with >> xml/xsl/css for all formats: ps, pdf, html. >> >> This way, I can use docbook-dtd 4.4 and all its possibilities. > > Will we use the jade transformation engine on the new format ? No, xslt stylesheets and saxon parser. Jade is really way out of date. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org> |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-11 10:17:19
|
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 06:19, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > I know you are not pro that, but would you mind if I change the format=20 > of doc from sgml to xml, as sgml is quite stagnant, not to mention the=20 > dssl stysheets. >=20 > It makes outputs more and more ugly, compared to what can be done with=20 > xml/xsl/css for all formats: ps, pdf, html. >=20 > This way, I can use docbook-dtd 4.4 and all its possibilities. Will we use the jade transformation engine on the new format ?=20 --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-11 10:15:29
|
Hi Xenofon, On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 20:06, Xenofon Grigoriadis wrote: > Hi, >=20 > here is the problem I have: >=20 > I have a problem on starting the current version 0.3.0 on my winXP system= . =20 > =20 > The installation had been completed without errors, but when I tried to=20 > start the program, the following error message occured (translated from=20 > German):=20 > =20 > "The application could not start, because libglib-2.0-0.dll was not=20 > found. Re-Installing the application could solve the problem."=20 > =20 > The suggestion does not help. =20 It's a windows caned message, nothing from cssed. > I actually have gtk2 for win installed and other gtk-applications run=20 > smoothly. =20 > =20 > So, what could be the problem?=20 It seems cssed is not loading properly the required gtk and glib libraries. We're ready for a new minor release, so we'll not fix the previous one as it's ready to be obsoleted. If you want, I can upload for you a pre-release of cssed-0.3.1 that fixes lots of issues on windows. This way you can tell us if the problem is still present, so we could go for a fix on the new installer, instead of fixing the ready-to-be-obsoleted one. If you post here what version of gtk are you using, and you're willing to take a try to the new installer, I'll build it for you and upload it to a location where you could download it. Is it ok for you ? Thanks in advance for your help. --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-11 09:15:04
|
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:14, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > This option is uncheckable once it is checked, unless you close the=20 > document list. >=20 > Could it be made uncheckable? Yes, it is now uncheckable with Gtk-2.6 I'm not sure if it will stay here too long. In fact this "Always on top" stuff should be managed by the window manager not the app, and it will not work in all window managers, so may be it could be removed in a near future. As example, with gnome/metacity it's much better to set the "On top" menu item on the window frame - it can be disabled - instead of the built-in "On top" functionality. If I finally decide not to remove it, I will implement a roundabout to be able to uncheck it, meanwhile 2.6 don't reaches the distros. Regards. --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-11 05:19:25
|
I know you are not pro that, but would you mind if I change the format=20= of doc from sgml to xml, as sgml is quite stagnant, not to mention the=20= dssl stysheets. It makes outputs more and more ugly, compared to what can be done with=20= xml/xsl/css for all formats: ps, pdf, html. This way, I can use docbook-dtd 4.4 and all its possibilities. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>= |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-10 20:54:29
|
Le 10 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 21:28, Iago Rubio a =E9crit : > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:22, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote: >> I have two scenarii: >> >> 1 - I use the left mouse button to drag and drop >> >> Then the entry is duplicated at the end of the list with no index >> >> If the entry is an untitled document, i.e. not saved, the new >> duplicated entry has no name, no path, saved box checked, no index. >> >> If the entry is a modified document and I have reloaded the current >> document list (to get the new status of file, i.e. saved check box >> unchecked, otherwise it has the status of the file when opening it) >> before the drag and drop, the new duplicated entry has a saved box >> checked and no index. > > Fixed, untitled documents will not be taken into account when dropping > data, and you can not drag to one list to itself. > >> 2 - I use the right mouse button to drag and drop > >> Nothing happens but the drag is performed, just not the drop. > > It's ok, the right button is required. So, maybe disable it otherwise it's confusing. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org> |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-10 20:52:09
|
Le 10 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 21:27, Iago Rubio a =E9crit : > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:48, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote: >> When I use the up arrow at the bottom of the panel, the path has two >> //, which is not correct, it should have one: >> >> //Library should be /Library > > > Yes sometimes it happens it's written // instead of / and while it's > valid it's used. > > But surely it was written after to hit the button, as it only touches > the last part of the path, not the start of it. > > I'll change all this path construction code, to g_build_filename(). > > I changed it once, but it segfaulted badly. > > I've just updated my gtk and glib and I will test it again, so it'll = be > fixed soon. > > If you're reporting when writting something like "/usr/src" and = hitting > the button it get converted to "//usr", please report again as it'll = be > a unknown bug. No, the behaviour is reproducible when I have written /foo/bar/toto and=20= click the arrow up button, then it writes //foo/bar. That does not work if I drag the path to the doc list thereafter. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org> |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-10 20:49:06
|
Le 10 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 21:15, Iago Rubio a =E9crit : > On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:29, Mich=E8le Garoche wrote: >> I cannot get this behaviour working. > > I've seen in Gtk-2.4 for window this failing also, but working on > gtk-2.2. > > What are the symptoms in your system ? > > Does the document get closed when you click it and drag out without > releaseing the button ? > > It'd be nice if you could elaborate it a little. No, nothing happens, so that I cannot elaborate. Sorry it works, but I did not know you have to click on the cross, then=20= I have to wait a very long time to get the drag, and I should put it on=20= the other cross, otherwise it does not work. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org> |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-10 20:28:51
|
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:22, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > I have two scenarii: >=20 > 1 - I use the left mouse button to drag and drop >=20 > Then the entry is duplicated at the end of the list with no index >=20 > If the entry is an untitled document, i.e. not saved, the new=20 > duplicated entry has no name, no path, saved box checked, no index. >=20 > If the entry is a modified document and I have reloaded the current=20 > document list (to get the new status of file, i.e. saved check box=20 > unchecked, otherwise it has the status of the file when opening it)=20 > before the drag and drop, the new duplicated entry has a saved box=20 > checked and no index. Fixed, untitled documents will not be taken into account when dropping data, and you can not drag to one list to itself. > 2 - I use the right mouse button to drag and drop > Nothing happens but the drag is performed, just not the drop. It's ok, the right button is required. --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-10 20:27:53
|
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:48, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > When I use the up arrow at the bottom of the panel, the path has two=20 > //, which is not correct, it should have one: >=20 > //Library should be /Library Yes sometimes it happens it's written // instead of / and while it's valid it's used. But surely it was written after to hit the button, as it only touches the last part of the path, not the start of it. I'll change all this path construction code, to g_build_filename(). I changed it once, but it segfaulted badly. I've just updated my gtk and glib and I will test it again, so it'll be fixed soon. If you're reporting when writting something like "/usr/src" and hitting the button it get converted to "//usr", please report again as it'll be a unknown bug. --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-10 20:15:51
|
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:29, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > I cannot get this behaviour working. I've seen in Gtk-2.4 for window this failing also, but working on gtk-2.2. What are the symptoms in your system ? Does the document get closed when you click it and drag out without releaseing the button ? It'd be nice if you could elaborate it a little. Regards. --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-10 19:37:26
|
Le 10 f=E9vr. 2005, =E0 19:45, Iago Rubio a =E9crit : >> - a remove duplicate entries since it may happen that when appending = a >> document list to another one, some files entries are in both, hence=20= >> the >> append process duplicates entries. > > Yes, good idea. I should take a look at this, but I don't know where = to > place more buttons :) There is place at the bottom no? Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org> |
From: Xenofon G. <xgr...@ya...> - 2005-02-10 19:07:16
|
Hi, here is the problem I have: I have a problem on starting the current version 0.3.0 on my winXP system= =2E =20 =20 The installation had been completed without errors, but when I tried to=20 start the program, the following error message occured (translated from=20 German):=20 =20 "The application could not start, because libglib-2.0-0.dll was not=20 found. Re-Installing the application could solve the problem."=20 =20 The suggestion does not help. =20 =20 I actually have gtk2 for win installed and other gtk-applications run=20 smoothly. =20 =20 So, what could be the problem?=20 =20 Thanks a lot in advance,=20 =20 Xenofon --=20 ------------------------- Xenofon Grigoriadis Pfarrer-Martini-Stra=DFe 22 53121 Bonn Germany Tel: +49 179 102 46 51 e-mail: xgr...@ya... ------------------------- |
From: Iago R. <iag...@hi...> - 2005-02-10 18:45:51
|
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 11:02, Mich=C3=A8le Garoche wrote: > I find the "Append file" rather confusing, it is intended to append a=20 > document list not a document. >=20 > What do you think if it is renamed "Append document list"? I tried but it looked so long. I've changed it to "Append list", this way at least is less confusing. > Then in the future, we probably need: > - a sort function to sort the files entries in the document list Yes, it's planned. Clicking the tree view column headers. > - a remove duplicate entries since it may happen that when appending a=20 > document list to another one, some files entries are in both, hence the=20 > append process duplicates entries. Yes, good idea. I should take a look at this, but I don't know where to place more buttons :) May be a menu ? I don't like too much those dialogs with menus. --=20 Iago Rubio =20 - Home page * http://www.iagorubio.com=20 - Last project * http://cssed.sourceforge.net =20 - GPG Keyserv * pgp.rediris.es id=3D0x909BD4DD |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-10 10:48:50
|
When I use the up arrow at the bottom of the panel, the path has two=20 //, which is not correct, it should have one: //Library should be /Library Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>= |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-10 10:29:58
|
I cannot get this behaviour working. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>= |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-10 10:22:28
|
I have two scenarii: 1 - I use the left mouse button to drag and drop Then the entry is duplicated at the end of the list with no index If the entry is an untitled document, i.e. not saved, the new=20 duplicated entry has no name, no path, saved box checked, no index. If the entry is a modified document and I have reloaded the current=20 document list (to get the new status of file, i.e. saved check box=20 unchecked, otherwise it has the status of the file when opening it)=20 before the drag and drop, the new duplicated entry has a saved box=20 checked and no index. 2 - I use the right mouse button to drag and drop Nothing happens but the drag is performed, just not the drop. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>= |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-10 10:14:35
|
This option is uncheckable once it is checked, unless you close the=20 document list. Could it be made uncheckable? Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>= |
From: <mic...@ea...> - 2005-02-10 10:02:53
|
I find the "Append file" rather confusing, it is intended to append a=20 document list not a document. What do you think if it is renamed "Append document list"? Then in the future, we probably need: - a sort function to sort the files entries in the document list - a remove duplicate entries since it may happen that when appending a=20= document list to another one, some files entries are in both, hence the=20= append process duplicates entries. Mich=E8le <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>= |