clonezilla-live Mailing List for Clonezilla (Page 31)
A partition and disk imaging/cloning program
Brought to you by:
steven_shiau
Menu
▾
▴
clonezilla-live — Anything about Clonezilla live
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(54) |
Feb
(65) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(23) |
Aug
(71) |
Sep
(22) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(65) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(82) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(40) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(33) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(38) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(7) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(12) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(13) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(6) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
(9) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(10) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Montaseri <mon...@gm...> - 2010-09-15 19:35:33
|
Hi Bill, Same result with ext2 and mounting on /joe This root partition is recognized as ext3 type on the box (being cloned, can I called it clone-ee vs cloner). The clonee is RH AS4.0 (RedHat 4) about 2007 and kernel 2.6.9.* . So whatever mount(1) version and/or VFS version is placed in clonezilla, it should be able to read that. Is there any tools to actually read the superblock and see what type is recorded? Thanks On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Bill Gurley <gu...@io...>wrote: > You might try mounting as ext2. But also, I would never try to mount to > /mnt. Make a directory in /mnt and use that. e.g., /mnt/Temp > > > On 09/15/2010 03:22 PM, Montaseri wrote: > > Thanks Les and Andy, > > > > I suppose I can ignore this type recognition if I can solve my real > > problem, which lead me to this inquiry. > > > > My real problem is that I would like to boot off of clonezilla and > > proceed to mount the root filesystem (of the box being cloned) to learn > > stuff from /etc such as IP of the box and such. This is to automate the > > cloneing to an NFS location in a proper folder, for ease of restore and > > such. > > > > Currently when I clonezilla fdisk reports my root filesystem type to be > > 83. When I try to mount this like > > > > mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 /mnt > > > > I get the following error message > > VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev sda2 > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda2 ... > > .....and bunch of other suggestions including see dmesg > > > > Any suggestions... > > > > Thanks > > Medi > > > > > > > > > |
|
From: Bill G. <gu...@io...> - 2010-09-15 19:26:23
|
You might try mounting as ext2. But also, I would never try to mount to
/mnt. Make a directory in /mnt and use that. e.g., /mnt/Temp
On 09/15/2010 03:22 PM, Montaseri wrote:
> Thanks Les and Andy,
>
> I suppose I can ignore this type recognition if I can solve my real
> problem, which lead me to this inquiry.
>
> My real problem is that I would like to boot off of clonezilla and
> proceed to mount the root filesystem (of the box being cloned) to learn
> stuff from /etc such as IP of the box and such. This is to automate the
> cloneing to an NFS location in a proper folder, for ease of restore and
> such.
>
> Currently when I clonezilla fdisk reports my root filesystem type to be
> 83. When I try to mount this like
>
> mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 /mnt
>
> I get the following error message
> VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev sda2
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda2 ...
> .....and bunch of other suggestions including see dmesg
>
> Any suggestions...
>
> Thanks
> Medi
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Andy Berquist <abe...@ad...
> <mailto:abe...@ad...>> wrote:
>
> That’s normal. There was a kernel update somewhere in the 2.6 branch
> that deprecated the ide driver in favor of scsi emulation. I don’t
> know the exact details off the top of my head.
>
> Is it actually stopping you from doing something?
>
> -Andy
>
> *From:* Montaseri [mailto:mon...@gm...
> <mailto:mon...@gm...>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:52 PM
> *To:* clo...@li...
> <mailto:clo...@li...>
> *Subject:* Re: [Clonezilla-live] clonezilla live sees my flash as sd
>
> I have not received any reply on this inquiry. Can someone send me
> an email indicating that it is being heard.
>
> Thanks
> Medi
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Montaseri <mon...@gm...
> <mailto:mon...@gm...>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just installed and tried Clonezilla ver
> clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso and booted my Linux box.
>
> I have two PATA partitions and a few more SCSI partitions. When I
> run fdisk from my (native) linux box, I see
>
> [root@meditest]# fdisk -l
>
> Disk /dev/hda: 1048 MB, 1048190976 bytes
> 32 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1015 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 2016 * 512 = 1032192 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/hda1 1 131 132047+ 83 Linux
> /dev/hda2 132 1015 891072 83 Linux
>
> Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders
> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
>
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
> /dev/sda1 1 17 136552 83 Linux
> /dev/sda2 18 540 4200997+ 82 Linux swap
> /dev/sda3 541 1846 10490445 83 Linux
> /dev/sda4 1847 30401 229368037+ 5 Extended
> /dev/sda5 1847 3152 10490444+ 83 Linux
> /dev/sda6 3153 4458 10490444+ 83 Linux
> /dev/sda7 4459 8636 33559784+ 83 Linux
> /dev/sda8 8637 9942 10490444+ 83 Linux
> /dev/sda9 9943 11248 10490444+ 83 Linux
> /dev/sda10 11249 12554 10490444+ 83 Linux
> /dev/sda11 12555 30401 143356027 83 Linux
>
> But when I boot off of clonezilla, and run fdisk -l, I get
> (bunch of stuff skipped)
> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id
> System
> /dev/sda1 1 131 nnnn
> 83 Linux
> /dev/sda2 132 1015 nnnnn 83
> Linux // nnnn is ok...just lazy
> ...skipping stuff....
> /dev/sdb1
> /dev/sdb2
>
> Basically, Clonezilla is seeing both my flash disk and sata disk as
> scsi disks?
> Any ideas
>
> Thanks
> Medi
>
> This message (including any attachments) may contain
> confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or private proprietary
> information. The information is intended to be for the use of
> the individual or entity designated above. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender
> immediately, and delete the message and any attachments. Any
> disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this
> message or any attachments by an individual or entity other than
> the intended recipient is prohibited.
>
>
--
-Bill-
---------------------------------------------
Bill Gurley, Technical Director
Department of Chemistry
Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville
865-974-3145 (office)
---------------------------------------------
|
|
From: Andy B. <abe...@ad...> - 2010-09-15 19:26:08
|
That’s normal. There was a kernel update somewhere in the 2.6 branch that deprecated the ide driver in favor of scsi emulation. I don’t know the exact details off the top of my head. Is it actually stopping you from doing something? -Andy From: Montaseri [mailto:mon...@gm...] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:52 PM To: clo...@li... Subject: Re: [Clonezilla-live] clonezilla live sees my flash as sd I have not received any reply on this inquiry. Can someone send me an email indicating that it is being heard. Thanks Medi On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Montaseri <mon...@gm...<mailto:mon...@gm...>> wrote: Hi, Just installed and tried Clonezilla ver clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso and booted my Linux box. I have two PATA partitions and a few more SCSI partitions. When I run fdisk from my (native) linux box, I see [root@meditest]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/hda: 1048 MB, 1048190976 bytes 32 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1015 cylinders Units = cylinders of 2016 * 512 = 1032192 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 131 132047+ 83 Linux /dev/hda2 132 1015 891072 83 Linux Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 17 136552 83 Linux /dev/sda2 18 540 4200997+ 82 Linux swap /dev/sda3 541 1846 10490445 83 Linux /dev/sda4 1847 30401 229368037+ 5 Extended /dev/sda5 1847 3152 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda6 3153 4458 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda7 4459 8636 33559784+ 83 Linux /dev/sda8 8637 9942 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda9 9943 11248 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda10 11249 12554 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda11 12555 30401 143356027 83 Linux But when I boot off of clonezilla, and run fdisk -l, I get (bunch of stuff skipped) Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 131 nnnn 83 Linux /dev/sda2 132 1015 nnnnn 83 Linux // nnnn is ok...just lazy ...skipping stuff.... /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdb2 Basically, Clonezilla is seeing both my flash disk and sata disk as scsi disks? Any ideas Thanks Medi <font size="1" face="arial"> <blockquote> <p>This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential, proprietary, privileged and/or private proprietary information. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity designated above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender immediately, and delete the message and any attachments. Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this message or any attachments by an individual or entity other than the intended recipient is prohibited.</p> </blockquote> </font> |
|
From: Montaseri <mon...@gm...> - 2010-09-15 19:22:17
|
Thanks Les and Andy, I suppose I can ignore this type recognition if I can solve my real problem, which lead me to this inquiry. My real problem is that I would like to boot off of clonezilla and proceed to mount the root filesystem (of the box being cloned) to learn stuff from /etc such as IP of the box and such. This is to automate the cloneing to an NFS location in a proper folder, for ease of restore and such. Currently when I clonezilla fdisk reports my root filesystem type to be 83. When I try to mount this like mount -t ext3 /dev/sda2 /mnt I get the following error message VFS: Can't find ext3 filesystem on dev sda2 mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda2 ... .....and bunch of other suggestions including see dmesg Any suggestions... Thanks Medi On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Andy Berquist <abe...@ad...>wrote: > That’s normal. There was a kernel update somewhere in the 2.6 branch that > deprecated the ide driver in favor of scsi emulation. I don’t know the exact > details off the top of my head. > > > > Is it actually stopping you from doing something? > > > > -Andy > > > > *From:* Montaseri [mailto:mon...@gm...] > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 15, 2010 2:52 PM > *To:* clo...@li... > *Subject:* Re: [Clonezilla-live] clonezilla live sees my flash as sd > > > > I have not received any reply on this inquiry. Can someone send me an email > indicating that it is being heard. > > Thanks > Medi > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Montaseri <mon...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just installed and tried Clonezilla ver clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso > and booted my Linux box. > > I have two PATA partitions and a few more SCSI partitions. When I run fdisk > from my (native) linux box, I see > > [root@meditest]# fdisk -l > > Disk /dev/hda: 1048 MB, 1048190976 bytes > 32 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1015 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 2016 * 512 = 1032192 bytes > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/hda1 1 131 132047+ 83 Linux > /dev/hda2 132 1015 891072 83 Linux > > Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 1 17 136552 83 Linux > /dev/sda2 18 540 4200997+ 82 Linux swap > /dev/sda3 541 1846 10490445 83 Linux > /dev/sda4 1847 30401 229368037+ 5 Extended > /dev/sda5 1847 3152 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda6 3153 4458 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda7 4459 8636 33559784+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda8 8637 9942 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda9 9943 11248 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda10 11249 12554 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda11 12555 30401 143356027 83 Linux > > But when I boot off of clonezilla, and run fdisk -l, I get > (bunch of stuff skipped) > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 1 131 nnnn 83 > Linux > /dev/sda2 132 1015 nnnnn 83 > Linux // nnnn is ok...just lazy > ...skipping stuff.... > /dev/sdb1 > /dev/sdb2 > > Basically, Clonezilla is seeing both my flash disk and sata disk as scsi > disks? > Any ideas > > Thanks > Medi > > > > This message (including any attachments) may contain confidential, > proprietary, privileged and/or private proprietary information. The > information is intended to be for the use of the individual or entity > designated above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, > please notify the sender immediately, and delete the message and any > attachments. Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this > message or any attachments by an individual or entity other than the > intended recipient is prohibited. > > |
|
From: Bill G. <gu...@io...> - 2010-09-15 19:18:10
|
It has been my experience that linux will "see" PATA (the older IDE interface) drives as /dev/hda, etc., while SATA drives are treated like SCSI drives, or /dev/sda, etc. USB drives are ALSO seen as SCSI (/dev/sda). So this sounds pretty normal to me. On 09/15/2010 03:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Yes, it is on the list. I think this is just a side effect of the linux > version that is running. More recent ones map about everything into > /dev/sd? devices - and worse, it isn't all that predictable which one > will get which number as they are detected especially if any of them are > hotplug and may or may not be present at boot. > > > On 9/15/2010 1:52 PM, Montaseri wrote: >> I have not received any reply on this inquiry. Can someone send me an >> email indicating that it is being heard. >> >> Thanks >> Medi >> >> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Montaseri<mon...@gm... >> <mailto:mon...@gm...>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Just installed and tried Clonezilla ver >> clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso and booted my Linux box. >> >> I have two PATA partitions and a few more SCSI partitions. When I >> run fdisk from my (native) linux box, I see >> >> [root@meditest]# fdisk -l >> >> Disk /dev/hda: 1048 MB, 1048190976 bytes >> 32 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1015 cylinders >> Units = cylinders of 2016 * 512 = 1032192 bytes >> >> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System >> /dev/hda1 1 131 132047+ 83 Linux >> /dev/hda2 132 1015 891072 83 Linux >> >> Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders >> Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes >> >> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System >> /dev/sda1 1 17 136552 83 Linux >> /dev/sda2 18 540 4200997+ 82 Linux swap >> /dev/sda3 541 1846 10490445 83 Linux >> /dev/sda4 1847 30401 229368037+ 5 Extended >> /dev/sda5 1847 3152 10490444+ 83 Linux >> /dev/sda6 3153 4458 10490444+ 83 Linux >> /dev/sda7 4459 8636 33559784+ 83 Linux >> /dev/sda8 8637 9942 10490444+ 83 Linux >> /dev/sda9 9943 11248 10490444+ 83 Linux >> /dev/sda10 11249 12554 10490444+ 83 Linux >> /dev/sda11 12555 30401 143356027 83 Linux >> >> But when I boot off of clonezilla, and run fdisk -l, I get >> (bunch of stuff skipped) >> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id >> System >> /dev/sda1 1 131 nnnn >> 83 Linux >> /dev/sda2 132 1015 nnnnn 83 >> Linux // nnnn is ok...just lazy >> ...skipping stuff.... >> /dev/sdb1 >> /dev/sdb2 >> >> Basically, Clonezilla is seeing both my flash disk and sata disk as >> scsi disks? >> Any ideas >> >> Thanks >> Medi >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances >> and start using them to simplify application deployment and >> accelerate your shift to cloud computing. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Clonezilla-live mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live -- -Bill- --------------------------------------------- Bill Gurley, Technical Director Department of Chemistry Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville 865-974-3145 (office) --------------------------------------------- |
|
From: Les M. <les...@gm...> - 2010-09-15 19:06:11
|
Yes, it is on the list. I think this is just a side effect of the linux version that is running. More recent ones map about everything into /dev/sd? devices - and worse, it isn't all that predictable which one will get which number as they are detected especially if any of them are hotplug and may or may not be present at boot. On 9/15/2010 1:52 PM, Montaseri wrote: > I have not received any reply on this inquiry. Can someone send me an > email indicating that it is being heard. > > Thanks > Medi > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Montaseri <mon...@gm... > <mailto:mon...@gm...>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Just installed and tried Clonezilla ver > clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso and booted my Linux box. > > I have two PATA partitions and a few more SCSI partitions. When I > run fdisk from my (native) linux box, I see > > [root@meditest]# fdisk -l > > Disk /dev/hda: 1048 MB, 1048190976 bytes > 32 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1015 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 2016 * 512 = 1032192 bytes > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/hda1 1 131 132047+ 83 Linux > /dev/hda2 132 1015 891072 83 Linux > > Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 1 17 136552 83 Linux > /dev/sda2 18 540 4200997+ 82 Linux swap > /dev/sda3 541 1846 10490445 83 Linux > /dev/sda4 1847 30401 229368037+ 5 Extended > /dev/sda5 1847 3152 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda6 3153 4458 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda7 4459 8636 33559784+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda8 8637 9942 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda9 9943 11248 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda10 11249 12554 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda11 12555 30401 143356027 83 Linux > > But when I boot off of clonezilla, and run fdisk -l, I get > (bunch of stuff skipped) > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id > System > /dev/sda1 1 131 nnnn > 83 Linux > /dev/sda2 132 1015 nnnnn 83 > Linux // nnnn is ok...just lazy > ...skipping stuff.... > /dev/sdb1 > /dev/sdb2 > > Basically, Clonezilla is seeing both my flash disk and sata disk as > scsi disks? > Any ideas > > Thanks > Medi > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances > and start using them to simplify application deployment and > accelerate your shift to cloud computing. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > Clonezilla-live mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live |
|
From: Montaseri <mon...@gm...> - 2010-09-15 18:52:39
|
I have not received any reply on this inquiry. Can someone send me an email indicating that it is being heard. Thanks Medi On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Montaseri <mon...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > Just installed and tried Clonezilla ver clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso > and booted my Linux box. > > I have two PATA partitions and a few more SCSI partitions. When I run fdisk > from my (native) linux box, I see > > [root@meditest]# fdisk -l > > Disk /dev/hda: 1048 MB, 1048190976 bytes > 32 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1015 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 2016 * 512 = 1032192 bytes > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/hda1 1 131 132047+ 83 Linux > /dev/hda2 132 1015 891072 83 Linux > > Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes > 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders > Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes > > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 1 17 136552 83 Linux > /dev/sda2 18 540 4200997+ 82 Linux swap > /dev/sda3 541 1846 10490445 83 Linux > /dev/sda4 1847 30401 229368037+ 5 Extended > /dev/sda5 1847 3152 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda6 3153 4458 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda7 4459 8636 33559784+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda8 8637 9942 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda9 9943 11248 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda10 11249 12554 10490444+ 83 Linux > /dev/sda11 12555 30401 143356027 83 Linux > > But when I boot off of clonezilla, and run fdisk -l, I get > (bunch of stuff skipped) > Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System > /dev/sda1 1 131 nnnn 83 > Linux > /dev/sda2 132 1015 nnnnn 83 > Linux // nnnn is ok...just lazy > ...skipping stuff.... > /dev/sdb1 > /dev/sdb2 > > Basically, Clonezilla is seeing both my flash disk and sata disk as scsi > disks? > Any ideas > > Thanks > Medi > |
|
From: Montaseri <mon...@gm...> - 2010-09-14 01:14:56
|
Hi, Just installed and tried Clonezilla ver clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso and booted my Linux box. I have two PATA partitions and a few more SCSI partitions. When I run fdisk from my (native) linux box, I see [root@meditest]# fdisk -l Disk /dev/hda: 1048 MB, 1048190976 bytes 32 heads, 63 sectors/track, 1015 cylinders Units = cylinders of 2016 * 512 = 1032192 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 131 132047+ 83 Linux /dev/hda2 132 1015 891072 83 Linux Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 17 136552 83 Linux /dev/sda2 18 540 4200997+ 82 Linux swap /dev/sda3 541 1846 10490445 83 Linux /dev/sda4 1847 30401 229368037+ 5 Extended /dev/sda5 1847 3152 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda6 3153 4458 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda7 4459 8636 33559784+ 83 Linux /dev/sda8 8637 9942 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda9 9943 11248 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda10 11249 12554 10490444+ 83 Linux /dev/sda11 12555 30401 143356027 83 Linux But when I boot off of clonezilla, and run fdisk -l, I get (bunch of stuff skipped) Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 131 nnnn 83 Linux /dev/sda2 132 1015 nnnnn 83 Linux // nnnn is ok...just lazy ...skipping stuff.... /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdb2 Basically, Clonezilla is seeing both my flash disk and sata disk as scsi disks? Any ideas Thanks Medi |
|
From: Andreas W. <and...@nt...> - 2010-09-10 08:00:43
|
Check the FAQ on clonezilla.org! http://drbl.org/faq/fine-print.php?path=./2_System/68_manually_partclone_restore.faq#68_manually_partclone_restore.faq Regards, Andreas On 10.09.2010 04:44, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > I searched through the FAQ before posting here - > > I have an older FreeBSD system that has a lot of stuff on it I want to > keep; the boot disk (MBR) is messed up, and I don't really care anymore > as I'm using Linux. I wonder if I can mount the resulting *.img > file(s) from Clonezilla in some manner and peruse and copy the data off > that I need. Or is there another clever way to do this via unarchiving > them into a filesystem or some other file that I can mount via loop? > > > Thanks... |
|
From: Thamm, R. <rus...@ds...> - 2010-09-10 05:16:23
|
Thanks Robert, as per usual, the minute I post to a mailing list, I solve the problem. The problem is Windows - as long as I ensure that only one disk is in the PC when Windows is running, there is no problem. If you boot Windows with both disks resident, Windows does something to drive D which makes it no longer an exact copy. So when the system shuts down after cloning, I remove the second drive and put it in the cupboard until I need to restore it. Cheers Russell -----Original Message----- From: Robert K Coffman Jr. -Info From Data Corp. [mailto:bco...@in...] Sent: Thursday, 9 September 2010 11:36 PM To: Thamm, Russell Subject: Re: [Clonezilla-live] Cloning XP NTFS Disk [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] Knowing what service is crashing & with what error would be helpful in explaining this. What kind of drives are they? > However, when I logged-in, firstly I received a message about finding > new hardware (wtf) and then a service crashed. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. |
|
From: Forrest A. <fo...@gm...> - 2010-09-10 02:45:04
|
I searched through the FAQ before posting here - I have an older FreeBSD system that has a lot of stuff on it I want to keep; the boot disk (MBR) is messed up, and I don't really care anymore as I'm using Linux. I wonder if I can mount the resulting *.img file(s) from Clonezilla in some manner and peruse and copy the data off that I need. Or is there another clever way to do this via unarchiving them into a filesystem or some other file that I can mount via loop? Thanks... |
|
From: Thamm, R. <rus...@ds...> - 2010-09-08 06:45:05
|
Hi, I have an XP machine with 2 identical removable hard drives. I have installed a fresh version of XP SP3 on drive C: and want to clone this to drive D: The point is to be able to return drive C: to its current clean state whenever I need to. I performed a device-device clone using clonezilla and everything appeared to work properly. To check the clone, I swapped the two drives and booted off the clone. This seemed to boot OK. However, when I logged-in, firstly I received a message about finding new hardware (wtf) and then a service crashed. Everytime I boot off the clone and login, I get a service crash (the Event Log actually reports 24 separate Errors each time) Everytime I boot off the original, it works perfectly. I tried repeating the cloning process but with the same unsatisfactory result. I have done this previously with Ghost and had no problem. Is there some special option or incantation that I am missing? Cheers Russell Thamm IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. |
|
From: Steven S. <st...@nc...> - 2010-09-04 11:11:36
|
Which VGA card do you have there? Did you try the "Safe Graphic Setting" mode in the boot menu: http://clonezilla.org/clonezilla-live/doc/fine-print.php?path=./01_Save_disk_image/01-clonezilla-boot-menu.doc#01-clonezilla-boot-menu.doc Steven. On 2010年09月04日 03:25, Zoltan Kerenyi Nagy wrote: > Hi! > > I tried the latedst testing version of Clonezilla, and nothing happens > after the yellow-wfite splas screen. I can scroll in between the menu > items, 1024*768, memtest, etc. but after an enter nothing happens. > Maybe a bug. > > Regards, > > Zoltan > > -- > http://mbicomp.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > > > _______________________________________________ > Clonezilla-live mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live > -- Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. http://www.nchc.org.tw Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A |
|
From: Andreas W. <and...@nt...> - 2010-09-04 09:36:06
|
Hi, I ran fsck on the disk and I also verified the image using a SHA1 checksum. The image is rather large and contains sensitive data. However, I will try to create an image with smaller size and without any sensitive data showing the same problem. As soon as I succeeded in doing so I will provide that image to you. Regards, Andreas On 04.09.2010 09:32, Steven Shiau wrote: > Did you try to run fsck to make sure the image is OK? > Or if the partition image does not contain sensitive/classified data, is > that possible you can provide the image for us to check that? > > Steven. > > On 2010年09月04日 06:44, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> omitting the -C option does not work when restoring to a file (as >> expected). I also created SHA1 checksums in order to verify the image is OK. >> >> Mounting the partition from an image created with dd works, so it seems >> this is really a bug in clonezilla or partclone. >> >> Regards, >> Andreas >> >> >> On 01.09.2010 17:15, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: >> >>> I restore the image to a file and the partition holding the file is >>> large enough to hold the restored partition. I can try it again omitting >>> the -C option of partclone.restore but I am quite sure that it won't >>> make a difference. >>> >>> By the way: partclone.restore is v0.2.14 and partclone.extfs is the >>> version included in clonezilla live 1.2.5-35. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Andreas >>> >>> >>> On 01.09.2010 16:44, Steven Shiau wrote: >>> >>>> The error message: "EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 >>>> exceeds size of >>>> device (47712800 blocks)" >>>> Maybe you have to check the destination partition size is equal or >>>> larger than the source one. >>>> >>>> Steven. >>>> >>>> On 2010年08月31日 16:37, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I recently made an image of my HDD using clonezilla live and discovered >>>>> a problem with the partclone image of an ext4 partition on that HDD. The >>>>> ext4 partition is the root "/" partition of a Fedora 13 installation. >>>>> >>>>> Problem description: >>>>> >>>>> After creating an image (with gzip compression) of the HDD I ran >>>>> >>>>> # cat sda3.ext4-ptcl-img.gz | gzip -d -c | partclone.restore -C -s - -o >>>>> sda3.img >>>>> >>>>> to obtain "sda3.img" which I want to loop mount using the command >>>>> >>>>> # mount -t ext4 -o loop,ro sda3.img /media/ext4test/ >>>>> >>>>> yielding the following error output from mount >>>>> >>>>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, >>>>> missing codepage or helper program, or other error >>>>> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >>>>> dmesg | tail or so >>>>> >>>>> the corresponding dmesg output is >>>>> >>>>> EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 exceeds size of >>>>> device (47712800 blocks) >>>>> >>>>> I searched the web to find out if the problem is more widespread, but I >>>>> did not (yet) find anything clonezilla/partclone related. >>>>> >>>>> The partition itself is OK since Fedora 13 boots flawlessly from it and >>>>> fsck does not report any errors. However, due to the above error I >>>>> cannot run fsck on the file "sda3.img". The error happens with both, the >>>>> 32-bit and the 64-bit versions of Fedora 13. >>>>> >>>>> Previously I never had problems with clonezilla and ext3 partitions. I >>>>> hit this error using clonezilla-live-1.2.5-35-i686.iso and >>>>> clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso (the latest stable versions of >>>>> clonezilla live). >>>>> >>>>> Additional information is attached. >>>>> >>>>> Did I miss an option in the mount command? Is there something else in >>>>> the procedure I am using? >>>>> >>>>> I highly appreciate any help in resolving this problem. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you in advance! >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Andreas >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> PS: The "/boot" partition on that HDD also uses ext4 and it can be loop >>>>> mounted without any problems from an image using the procedure as >>>>> described above. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >>>>> >>>>> Show off your parallel programming skills. >>>>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Clonezilla-live mailing list >>>>> Clo...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> >>>> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. >>>> http://www.nchc.org.tw >>>> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A >>>> Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >>>> >>>> Show off your parallel programming skills. >>>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Clonezilla-live mailing list >>>> Clo...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >>> >>> Show off your parallel programming skills. >>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Clonezilla-live mailing list >>> Clo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >> > -- Univ.Ass. Dipl.-Ing. Andreas WINKELBAUER Institute of Communications and Radio Frequency Engineering Vienna University of Technology Gusshausstrasse 25/389 1040 Wien, AUSTRIA phone: +43 1 58801 38960 fax: +43 1 58801 38999 email: and...@nt... web: http://www.nt.tuwien.ac.at/staff/andreas-winkelbauer/ |
|
From: Steven S. <st...@nc...> - 2010-09-04 07:32:36
|
Did you try to run fsck to make sure the image is OK? Or if the partition image does not contain sensitive/classified data, is that possible you can provide the image for us to check that? Steven. On 2010年09月04日 06:44, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: > Hi, > > omitting the -C option does not work when restoring to a file (as > expected). I also created SHA1 checksums in order to verify the image is OK. > > Mounting the partition from an image created with dd works, so it seems > this is really a bug in clonezilla or partclone. > > Regards, > Andreas > > > On 01.09.2010 17:15, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: > >> I restore the image to a file and the partition holding the file is >> large enough to hold the restored partition. I can try it again omitting >> the -C option of partclone.restore but I am quite sure that it won't >> make a difference. >> >> By the way: partclone.restore is v0.2.14 and partclone.extfs is the >> version included in clonezilla live 1.2.5-35. >> >> Regards, >> Andreas >> >> >> On 01.09.2010 16:44, Steven Shiau wrote: >> >>> The error message: "EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 >>> exceeds size of >>> device (47712800 blocks)" >>> Maybe you have to check the destination partition size is equal or >>> larger than the source one. >>> >>> Steven. >>> >>> On 2010年08月31日 16:37, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I recently made an image of my HDD using clonezilla live and discovered >>>> a problem with the partclone image of an ext4 partition on that HDD. The >>>> ext4 partition is the root "/" partition of a Fedora 13 installation. >>>> >>>> Problem description: >>>> >>>> After creating an image (with gzip compression) of the HDD I ran >>>> >>>> # cat sda3.ext4-ptcl-img.gz | gzip -d -c | partclone.restore -C -s - -o >>>> sda3.img >>>> >>>> to obtain "sda3.img" which I want to loop mount using the command >>>> >>>> # mount -t ext4 -o loop,ro sda3.img /media/ext4test/ >>>> >>>> yielding the following error output from mount >>>> >>>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, >>>> missing codepage or helper program, or other error >>>> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >>>> dmesg | tail or so >>>> >>>> the corresponding dmesg output is >>>> >>>> EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 exceeds size of >>>> device (47712800 blocks) >>>> >>>> I searched the web to find out if the problem is more widespread, but I >>>> did not (yet) find anything clonezilla/partclone related. >>>> >>>> The partition itself is OK since Fedora 13 boots flawlessly from it and >>>> fsck does not report any errors. However, due to the above error I >>>> cannot run fsck on the file "sda3.img". The error happens with both, the >>>> 32-bit and the 64-bit versions of Fedora 13. >>>> >>>> Previously I never had problems with clonezilla and ext3 partitions. I >>>> hit this error using clonezilla-live-1.2.5-35-i686.iso and >>>> clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso (the latest stable versions of >>>> clonezilla live). >>>> >>>> Additional information is attached. >>>> >>>> Did I miss an option in the mount command? Is there something else in >>>> the procedure I am using? >>>> >>>> I highly appreciate any help in resolving this problem. >>>> >>>> Thank you in advance! >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Andreas >>>> >>>> >>>> PS: The "/boot" partition on that HDD also uses ext4 and it can be loop >>>> mounted without any problems from an image using the procedure as >>>> described above. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >>>> >>>> Show off your parallel programming skills. >>>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Clonezilla-live mailing list >>>> Clo...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> >>> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. >>> http://www.nchc.org.tw >>> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A >>> Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >>> >>> Show off your parallel programming skills. >>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Clonezilla-live mailing list >>> Clo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > Clonezilla-live mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live > -- Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. http://www.nchc.org.tw Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A |
|
From: Andreas W. <and...@nt...> - 2010-09-03 22:44:57
|
Hi, omitting the -C option does not work when restoring to a file (as expected). I also created SHA1 checksums in order to verify the image is OK. Mounting the partition from an image created with dd works, so it seems this is really a bug in clonezilla or partclone. Regards, Andreas On 01.09.2010 17:15, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: > I restore the image to a file and the partition holding the file is > large enough to hold the restored partition. I can try it again omitting > the -C option of partclone.restore but I am quite sure that it won't > make a difference. > > By the way: partclone.restore is v0.2.14 and partclone.extfs is the > version included in clonezilla live 1.2.5-35. > > Regards, > Andreas > > > On 01.09.2010 16:44, Steven Shiau wrote: >> The error message: "EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 >> exceeds size of >> device (47712800 blocks)" >> Maybe you have to check the destination partition size is equal or >> larger than the source one. >> >> Steven. >> >> On 2010年08月31日 16:37, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I recently made an image of my HDD using clonezilla live and discovered >>> a problem with the partclone image of an ext4 partition on that HDD. The >>> ext4 partition is the root "/" partition of a Fedora 13 installation. >>> >>> Problem description: >>> >>> After creating an image (with gzip compression) of the HDD I ran >>> >>> # cat sda3.ext4-ptcl-img.gz | gzip -d -c | partclone.restore -C -s - -o >>> sda3.img >>> >>> to obtain "sda3.img" which I want to loop mount using the command >>> >>> # mount -t ext4 -o loop,ro sda3.img /media/ext4test/ >>> >>> yielding the following error output from mount >>> >>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, >>> missing codepage or helper program, or other error >>> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >>> dmesg | tail or so >>> >>> the corresponding dmesg output is >>> >>> EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 exceeds size of >>> device (47712800 blocks) >>> >>> I searched the web to find out if the problem is more widespread, but I >>> did not (yet) find anything clonezilla/partclone related. >>> >>> The partition itself is OK since Fedora 13 boots flawlessly from it and >>> fsck does not report any errors. However, due to the above error I >>> cannot run fsck on the file "sda3.img". The error happens with both, the >>> 32-bit and the 64-bit versions of Fedora 13. >>> >>> Previously I never had problems with clonezilla and ext3 partitions. I >>> hit this error using clonezilla-live-1.2.5-35-i686.iso and >>> clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso (the latest stable versions of >>> clonezilla live). >>> >>> Additional information is attached. >>> >>> Did I miss an option in the mount command? Is there something else in >>> the procedure I am using? >>> >>> I highly appreciate any help in resolving this problem. >>> >>> Thank you in advance! >>> >>> Regards, >>> Andreas >>> >>> >>> PS: The "/boot" partition on that HDD also uses ext4 and it can be loop >>> mounted without any problems from an image using the procedure as >>> described above. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >>> >>> Show off your parallel programming skills. >>> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Clonezilla-live mailing list >>> Clo...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >>> >> >> -- >> Steven Shiau <steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> >> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. >> http://www.nchc.org.tw >> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A >> Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > _______________________________________________ > Clonezilla-live mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live |
|
From: Zoltan K. N. <ker...@gm...> - 2010-09-03 19:26:05
|
Hi! I tried the latedst testing version of Clonezilla, and nothing happens after the yellow-wfite splas screen. I can scroll in between the menu items, 1024*768, memtest, etc. but after an enter nothing happens. Maybe a bug. Regards, Zoltan -- http://mbicomp.com/ |
|
From: Andreas W. <and...@nt...> - 2010-09-01 15:15:24
|
I restore the image to a file and the partition holding the file is large enough to hold the restored partition. I can try it again omitting the -C option of partclone.restore but I am quite sure that it won't make a difference. By the way: partclone.restore is v0.2.14 and partclone.extfs is the version included in clonezilla live 1.2.5-35. Regards, Andreas On 01.09.2010 16:44, Steven Shiau wrote: > The error message: "EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 > exceeds size of > device (47712800 blocks)" > Maybe you have to check the destination partition size is equal or > larger than the source one. > > Steven. > > On 2010年08月31日 16:37, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I recently made an image of my HDD using clonezilla live and discovered >> a problem with the partclone image of an ext4 partition on that HDD. The >> ext4 partition is the root "/" partition of a Fedora 13 installation. >> >> Problem description: >> >> After creating an image (with gzip compression) of the HDD I ran >> >> # cat sda3.ext4-ptcl-img.gz | gzip -d -c | partclone.restore -C -s - -o >> sda3.img >> >> to obtain "sda3.img" which I want to loop mount using the command >> >> # mount -t ext4 -o loop,ro sda3.img /media/ext4test/ >> >> yielding the following error output from mount >> >> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, >> missing codepage or helper program, or other error >> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >> dmesg | tail or so >> >> the corresponding dmesg output is >> >> EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 exceeds size of >> device (47712800 blocks) >> >> I searched the web to find out if the problem is more widespread, but I >> did not (yet) find anything clonezilla/partclone related. >> >> The partition itself is OK since Fedora 13 boots flawlessly from it and >> fsck does not report any errors. However, due to the above error I >> cannot run fsck on the file "sda3.img". The error happens with both, the >> 32-bit and the 64-bit versions of Fedora 13. >> >> Previously I never had problems with clonezilla and ext3 partitions. I >> hit this error using clonezilla-live-1.2.5-35-i686.iso and >> clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso (the latest stable versions of >> clonezilla live). >> >> Additional information is attached. >> >> Did I miss an option in the mount command? Is there something else in >> the procedure I am using? >> >> I highly appreciate any help in resolving this problem. >> >> Thank you in advance! >> >> Regards, >> Andreas >> >> >> PS: The "/boot" partition on that HDD also uses ext4 and it can be loop >> mounted without any problems from an image using the procedure as >> described above. >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: >> >> Show off your parallel programming skills. >> Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >> > > -- > Steven Shiau <steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> > National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. > http://www.nchc.org.tw > Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A > Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > > > > _______________________________________________ > Clonezilla-live mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live |
|
From: Steven S. <st...@nc...> - 2010-09-01 14:44:28
|
The error message: "EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 exceeds size of device (47712800 blocks)" Maybe you have to check the destination partition size is equal or larger than the source one. Steven. On 2010年08月31日 16:37, Andreas Winkelbauer wrote: > Hi, > > I recently made an image of my HDD using clonezilla live and discovered > a problem with the partclone image of an ext4 partition on that HDD. The > ext4 partition is the root "/" partition of a Fedora 13 installation. > > Problem description: > > After creating an image (with gzip compression) of the HDD I ran > > # cat sda3.ext4-ptcl-img.gz | gzip -d -c | partclone.restore -C -s - -o > sda3.img > > to obtain "sda3.img" which I want to loop mount using the command > > # mount -t ext4 -o loop,ro sda3.img /media/ext4test/ > > yielding the following error output from mount > > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, > missing codepage or helper program, or other error > In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try > dmesg | tail or so > > the corresponding dmesg output is > > EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 exceeds size of > device (47712800 blocks) > > I searched the web to find out if the problem is more widespread, but I > did not (yet) find anything clonezilla/partclone related. > > The partition itself is OK since Fedora 13 boots flawlessly from it and > fsck does not report any errors. However, due to the above error I > cannot run fsck on the file "sda3.img". The error happens with both, the > 32-bit and the 64-bit versions of Fedora 13. > > Previously I never had problems with clonezilla and ext3 partitions. I > hit this error using clonezilla-live-1.2.5-35-i686.iso and > clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso (the latest stable versions of > clonezilla live). > > Additional information is attached. > > Did I miss an option in the mount command? Is there something else in > the procedure I am using? > > I highly appreciate any help in resolving this problem. > > Thank you in advance! > > Regards, > Andreas > > > PS: The "/boot" partition on that HDD also uses ext4 and it can be loop > mounted without any problems from an image using the procedure as > described above. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: > > Show off your parallel programming skills. > Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd > > > _______________________________________________ > Clonezilla-live mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live > -- Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. http://www.nchc.org.tw Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A |
|
From: Andreas W. <and...@nt...> - 2010-08-31 09:06:42
|
Hi,
I recently made an image of my HDD using clonezilla live and discovered
a problem with the partclone image of an ext4 partition on that HDD. The
ext4 partition is the root "/" partition of a Fedora 13 installation.
Problem description:
After creating an image (with gzip compression) of the HDD I ran
# cat sda3.ext4-ptcl-img.gz | gzip -d -c | partclone.restore -C -s - -o
sda3.img
to obtain "sda3.img" which I want to loop mount using the command
# mount -t ext4 -o loop,ro sda3.img /media/ext4test/
yielding the following error output from mount
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
the corresponding dmesg output is
EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 47863659 exceeds size of
device (47712800 blocks)
I searched the web to find out if the problem is more widespread, but I
did not (yet) find anything clonezilla/partclone related.
The partition itself is OK since Fedora 13 boots flawlessly from it and
fsck does not report any errors. However, due to the above error I
cannot run fsck on the file "sda3.img". The error happens with both, the
32-bit and the 64-bit versions of Fedora 13.
Previously I never had problems with clonezilla and ext3 partitions. I
hit this error using clonezilla-live-1.2.5-35-i686.iso and
clonezilla-live-20100721-lucid.iso (the latest stable versions of
clonezilla live).
Additional information is attached.
Did I miss an option in the mount command? Is there something else in
the procedure I am using?
I highly appreciate any help in resolving this problem.
Thank you in advance!
Regards,
Andreas
PS: The "/boot" partition on that HDD also uses ext4 and it can be loop
mounted without any problems from an image using the procedure as
described above.
|
|
From: Zoltan K. N. <ker...@gm...> - 2010-08-27 18:56:11
|
Hi! Thanks I see now! I also heard of Nlite program, so I won't try doing it the clonezille way, which I first thought. Thanks so much! Best regards, Zoltan On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Nikolay Kasatkin < nik...@gm...> wrote: > You may be interested in Sysprep MS technology ( > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sysprep). > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Bill Gurley <gu...@io...>wrote: > >> My personal opinion is that this only makes sense for future virtual >> machine installations. --NOT for restoration to "real" physical >> machines. The reason is that there would be so many instances of >> hardware drivers that are needed and not present, it would be crazy >> trying to get everything working properly. I think it would be less >> hassle on a "real" machine to simply do a new XP install! >> >> >> On 08/27/2010 03:08 AM, Zoltan Kerenyi Nagy wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I'd like to ask wheter is it possible with clonezilla. >> > >> > I'd do as it follows: >> > >> > -to install a 6 gig partition VMWare image with XP >> > - put all program which I like (firefox, mediacoder, infra recorder, >> > adobe flash, word, excel, norton 360 activated so far) >> > >> > - clone this imaginary partition with clonezilla inside the VMware >> machine >> > >> > and can I restore this clonezilla image to for different machines? Of >> > course to bigger C partition thank 6 gig >> > >> > Will the XP pull the appropriate drivers after the restoring? Or with >> > just minor tuning? >> > >> > I'd like to avoid long xp installations... >> > >> > Should I try this way? >> > >> > Thank you, >> > >> > >> > >> > Zoltan >> >> -- >> -Bill- >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> Bill Gurley, Technical Director >> Department of Chemistry >> Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville >> 865-974-3145 (office) >> --------------------------------------------- >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program >> Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users >> worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and >> speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >> > > > > -- > Nikolay Kasatkin > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program > Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users > worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and > speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Clonezilla-live mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live > > -- http://mbicomp.com/ |
|
From: Nikolay K. <nik...@gm...> - 2010-08-27 11:59:58
|
You may be interested in Sysprep MS technology ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sysprep). On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Bill Gurley <gu...@io...>wrote: > My personal opinion is that this only makes sense for future virtual > machine installations. --NOT for restoration to "real" physical > machines. The reason is that there would be so many instances of > hardware drivers that are needed and not present, it would be crazy > trying to get everything working properly. I think it would be less > hassle on a "real" machine to simply do a new XP install! > > > On 08/27/2010 03:08 AM, Zoltan Kerenyi Nagy wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to ask wheter is it possible with clonezilla. > > > > I'd do as it follows: > > > > -to install a 6 gig partition VMWare image with XP > > - put all program which I like (firefox, mediacoder, infra recorder, > > adobe flash, word, excel, norton 360 activated so far) > > > > - clone this imaginary partition with clonezilla inside the VMware > machine > > > > and can I restore this clonezilla image to for different machines? Of > > course to bigger C partition thank 6 gig > > > > Will the XP pull the appropriate drivers after the restoring? Or with > > just minor tuning? > > > > I'd like to avoid long xp installations... > > > > Should I try this way? > > > > Thank you, > > > > > > > > Zoltan > > -- > -Bill- > > --------------------------------------------- > Bill Gurley, Technical Director > Department of Chemistry > Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville > 865-974-3145 (office) > --------------------------------------------- > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program > Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users > worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and > speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d > _______________________________________________ > Clonezilla-live mailing list > Clo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live > -- Nikolay Kasatkin |
|
From: Bill G. <gu...@io...> - 2010-08-27 11:40:06
|
My personal opinion is that this only makes sense for future virtual
machine installations. --NOT for restoration to "real" physical
machines. The reason is that there would be so many instances of
hardware drivers that are needed and not present, it would be crazy
trying to get everything working properly. I think it would be less
hassle on a "real" machine to simply do a new XP install!
On 08/27/2010 03:08 AM, Zoltan Kerenyi Nagy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to ask wheter is it possible with clonezilla.
>
> I'd do as it follows:
>
> -to install a 6 gig partition VMWare image with XP
> - put all program which I like (firefox, mediacoder, infra recorder,
> adobe flash, word, excel, norton 360 activated so far)
>
> - clone this imaginary partition with clonezilla inside the VMware machine
>
> and can I restore this clonezilla image to for different machines? Of
> course to bigger C partition thank 6 gig
>
> Will the XP pull the appropriate drivers after the restoring? Or with
> just minor tuning?
>
> I'd like to avoid long xp installations...
>
> Should I try this way?
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Zoltan
--
-Bill-
---------------------------------------------
Bill Gurley, Technical Director
Department of Chemistry
Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville
865-974-3145 (office)
---------------------------------------------
|
|
From: Zoltan K. N. <ker...@gm...> - 2010-08-27 07:08:52
|
Hi all, I'd like to ask wheter is it possible with clonezilla. I'd do as it follows: -to install a 6 gig partition VMWare image with XP - put all program which I like (firefox, mediacoder, infra recorder, adobe flash, word, excel, norton 360 activated so far) - clone this imaginary partition with clonezilla inside the VMware machine and can I restore this clonezilla image to for different machines? Of course to bigger C partition thank 6 gig Will the XP pull the appropriate drivers after the restoring? Or with just minor tuning? I'd like to avoid long xp installations... Should I try this way? Thank you, Zoltan |
|
From: Steven S. <st...@nc...> - 2010-08-01 12:24:53
|
Hi Steve, OK, your case is actually ESXi, I did not notice that it's different from ESX. Looks like ESXi has its own boot loader, not grub. I have no idea about the boot loader of ESXi. Do you have any idea about that? Steven. On 2010年07月31日 08:05, Steve Poe wrote: > Steven, > > The boot process appeared to have worked, but after login on the console, nothing from the backup of the VMFS partition is recognized by ESXi server after the restore. I tried to run grub against the restore disk (sdb), but I could not figure out what command I needed. > > If I mounted the VMFS partition with Clonezilla, it appeared to be the data was there, but I am not sure. > > I'd really like to figure this out (I am on the hunt), but there's something amiss in the restore process possibly, unless there is some validation of the original VMFS files that causes the problem. > > Steve > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven Shiau [mailto:st...@nc...] > Sent: Friday, July 30, 2010 12:55 AM > To: Steve Poe > Cc: clo...@li... > Subject: Re: [Clonezilla-live] Clonezilla 1.2.5-35 and VMFS > > Hi Steve, > > On 2010/7/30 下午 02:53, Steve Poe wrote: > >> Hi Steven, >> >> I wasn't sure I needed to do that on an ESXi/VMware system. At least in my first attempt of the VMFS backup, I did not have to make any changes. Any possibility of having an option to capture errors on grub? >> > I haev a ESX system here, and it's using grub 1 as the boot loader. Not > sure if yours is different. > To capture that, you have to start screen and run clonezilla manually to > log that. Maybe in the future, we can have such a way to log most of the > process. > > Steven. > >> Thanks. >> >> Steve >> >> On Jul 29, 2010, at 10:01 PM, Steven Shiau wrote: >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> On 2010年07月30日 12:57, Steve Poe wrote: >> Steven, >> >> I don't recall seeing error messages, but then I usually only look at the screen before me. Where should I look for error log file? >> >> There is no log file for grub-install. You have to press shirt-pageup to >> scroll-back the screen to see that. >> BTW, are you able to rerun grub-install manually? Any problem? >> >> Steven. >> As I was leaving work, I was loading the disk 750GB disk image onto the 1TB drive. >> >> Steve >> >> On Jul 29, 2010, at 9:03 PM, Steven Shiau wrote: >> >> So the failing to boot issue still exists? >> Did you see any error messages when grub-install was run during cloning? >> >> Steven. >> >> On 2010年07月30日 06:52, Steve Poe wrote: >> Sorry, sda1 is an extended partition. >> >> Steve Poe<Ste...@de...<mailto:Ste...@de...>> wrote: >> >> >> After creating a disk-to-image of my test ESXi server, I noticed the folder, I see partitions sda2-sda8 but it has skipped sda1. >> >> Steve >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Steven Shiau [mailto:st...@nc...] >> Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 1:27 AM >> To: Steve Poe >> Cc: clo...@li...<mailto:clo...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Clonezilla-live] Clonezilla 1.2.5-35 and VMFS >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> On 2010/7/29 下午 03:02, Steve Poe wrote: >> >> I will give it a try. Any thought to adding VMFS tools to mount or check the source/target partition? >> >> What did you mean? If you mean to include vmfs tools in Clonezilla live, >> yes, actually it has been included. You can find >> vmfs-tools version 0.2.1-1 in Clonezilla live 1.2.5-38. >> >> Steven. >> >> Steve >> On Jul 28, 2010, at 11:02 PM, Steven Shiau wrote: >> >> >> Hi Steve, >> Thanks for this bug report. >> We have fixed this issue and release another testing Clonezilla live >> 1.2.5-38 in the testing branch. >> Could you please give it a try and tell us the results? >> Thanks. >> >> Steven. >> >> On 2010/7/28 上午 05:52, Steve Poe wrote: >> >> VMFS partition is recognized as VMFS when creating a disk-to-image file. >> The VMFS partition is recognized as raw when creating a disk-to-disk clone. >> In my test, I was cloning a 750GB and attempting to restore on a 1TB >> disk but without changing >> the partition layout. >> Steve >> ****************************************************************** >> DemandTec Email Notice >> This email and any attachments may contain confidential and/or proprietary >> information and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you >> are not >> the intended recipient we request that you notify us via email or >> telephone and >> delete all copies of the message from your systems. Additionally, although >> DemandTec has taken reasonable precautions to ensure the security of this >> email and any attachments, we encourage you to take similar precautions and >> accept no liability for any loss or damage resulting from its use. >> DemandTec, 1 Franklin Parkway, Building 910, San Mateo, CA 94403-1906, >> 650-645-7100 >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the >> Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share >> of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: >> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;226879339;13503038;l? >> http://clk.atdmt.com/CRS/go/247765532/direct/01/ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li...<mailto:Clo...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >> >> -- >> Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> >> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. >> http://www.nchc.org.tw >> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A >> Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the >> Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share >> of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li...<mailto:Clo...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >> >> >> -- >> Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> >> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. >> http://www.nchc.org.tw >> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A >> Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the >> Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share >> of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li...<mailto:Clo...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the >> Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share >> of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm >> _______________________________________________ >> Clonezilla-live mailing list >> Clo...@li...<mailto:Clo...@li...> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clonezilla-live >> >> >> -- >> Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> >> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. http://www.nchc.org.tw >> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A >> Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A >> >> >> >> Steve Poe | Sr. IT Technician >> DemandTec, Inc. | 1 Franklin Parkway, Building 910 | San Mateo, CA 94403 >> t | 650-645-7219 m | 650-743-5031 >> www.demandtec.com<http://www.demandtec.com/> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> >> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. http://www.nchc.org.tw >> Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A >> Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A >> >> >> >> Steve Poe | Sr. IT Technician >> DemandTec, Inc. | 1 Franklin Parkway, Building 910 | San Mateo, CA 94403 >> t | 650-645-7219 m | 650-743-5031 >> www.demandtec.com<http://www.demandtec.com/> >> >> >> >> > -- Steven Shiau<steven _at_ nchc org tw> <steven _at_ stevenshiau org> National Center for High-performance Computing, Taiwan. http://www.nchc.org.tw Public Key Server PGP Key ID: 1024D/9762755A Fingerprint: A2A1 08B7 C22C 3D06 34DB F4BC 08B3 E3D7 9762 755A |
4 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
