Menu
▾
▴
bodington-developers — Mailing list for Bodington developers
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(41) |
May
(353) |
Jun
(133) |
Jul
(534) |
Aug
(401) |
Sep
(219) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(144) |
Dec
(61) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
(200) |
Feb
(130) |
Mar
(345) |
Apr
(153) |
May
(247) |
Jun
(338) |
Jul
(222) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(76) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(81) |
Feb
(44) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(6) |
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(7) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@ou...> - 2006-03-29 10:17:20
|
Andrew Booth wrote: > I'm trying to merge the peer marker code with that on HEAD, but I've run > into a problem. The contents.html does not display on the left hand side. > Instead, I get a menu with Search etc. on it. Looks like some change has > been made to the code. > > How do I get my contents.html to display properly? Do you have a copy of main.html in the (Peer Marking Tool) PMT template directory? If not you should probably copy one from another tool that uses contents.html (eg questionnaire). This is from looking at WebLearn as I don't have a checkout of Bodington at the moment but I suspect Bodington is very similar in this. -- -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ |
|
From: Colin T. <col...@ou...> - 2006-03-29 10:13:46
|
Andrew Booth wrote: > I'm trying to merge the peer marker code with that on HEAD, but I've run > into a problem. The contents.html does not display on the left hand side. > Instead, I get a menu with Search etc. on it. Looks like some change has > been made to the code. Is it the introduction, search, etc that you get in the search tool? In which case it's probably because it's using the default template for the tool (which Bod incorrectly thinks is the search tool -- that's another story...) I'd check that you have a nickname for your tool in the properties (default properties) file. > How do I get my contents.html to display properly? > > Aggie > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
|
From: Andrew B. <a.g...@le...> - 2006-03-29 10:06:08
|
I'm trying to merge the peer marker code with that on HEAD, but I've run into a problem. The contents.html does not display on the left hand side. Instead, I get a menu with Search etc. on it. Looks like some change has been made to the code. How do I get my contents.html to display properly? Aggie |
|
From: Jon M. <jo...@te...> - 2006-03-28 20:22:24
|
Do you think that contact might be interested in supporting a translation project? Jon Paul Davis wrote: >I've just done something I'd been promising for a while - a follow-up to >people who had received a demo CD or download. It came to about 180 valid >names since we took over in August last year - by valid I took out >duplicates and obvious mistooks. >One response was along the lines of "It looks good, but I'd be even more >interested if it was in Spanish" > >Paul >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Jon Maber" <jo...@te...> >To: <bod...@li...> >Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:49 PM >Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] Spanish Bodington > > > > >>Alistair Young wrote: >> >> >> >>>Thanks for your kind comments Jon :) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Kind comments? Couldn't you hear the sarcastic way I typed that? ;-) >> >> >> >>>The i18n only works for xml templates though. If someone needed the whole >>>site in Spanish it would mean a lot of conversion to new style templates. >>> >>>Then again, that was one of my many jobs, to identify the most used ones >>> >>> >>>from the logs... >> >> >>> >>> >>Well I think the conversion of the templates would be a relatively small >>task >>compared to the job of translating. (I've had hours of conversation >>with people >>about how to translate VLE into spanish and I don't think we ever did >>come to >>a conclusion. It's the word environment that causes the problems since the >>Spanish equivalent really only refers to outdoors envirnoments, the >> >> >climate, > > >>flora and fauna etc. It's debates like this that slow things down >>because the only >>proper solution is to consult people who work in this field in Spain and >>of course >>that takes time.) >> >>By the way, isn't there an automation tool for converting the templates? >> >>Jon >> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting >> >> >language > > >>that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live >> >> >webcast > > >>and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding >> >> >territory! > > >>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 >>_______________________________________________ >>Bodington-developers mailing list >>Bod...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> >> >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language >that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast >and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! >http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 >_______________________________________________ >Bodington-developers mailing list >Bod...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > > |
|
From: Paul D. <pau...@ou...> - 2006-03-28 19:46:41
|
I've just done something I'd been promising for a while - a follow-up to people who had received a demo CD or download. It came to about 180 valid names since we took over in August last year - by valid I took out duplicates and obvious mistooks. One response was along the lines of "It looks good, but I'd be even more interested if it was in Spanish" Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Maber" <jo...@te...> To: <bod...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:49 PM Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] Spanish Bodington > Alistair Young wrote: > > >Thanks for your kind comments Jon :) > > > > > Kind comments? Couldn't you hear the sarcastic way I typed that? ;-) > > >The i18n only works for xml templates though. If someone needed the whole > >site in Spanish it would mean a lot of conversion to new style templates. > > > >Then again, that was one of my many jobs, to identify the most used ones > >from the logs... > > > > > Well I think the conversion of the templates would be a relatively small > task > compared to the job of translating. (I've had hours of conversation > with people > about how to translate VLE into spanish and I don't think we ever did > come to > a conclusion. It's the word environment that causes the problems since the > Spanish equivalent really only refers to outdoors envirnoments, the climate, > flora and fauna etc. It's debates like this that slow things down > because the only > proper solution is to consult people who work in this field in Spain and > of course > that takes time.) > > By the way, isn't there an automation tool for converting the templates? > > Jon > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > |
|
From: Jon M. <jo...@te...> - 2006-03-28 18:49:42
|
Alistair Young wrote: >Thanks for your kind comments Jon :) > > Kind comments? Couldn't you hear the sarcastic way I typed that? ;-) >The i18n only works for xml templates though. If someone needed the whole >site in Spanish it would mean a lot of conversion to new style templates. > >Then again, that was one of my many jobs, to identify the most used ones >from the logs... > > Well I think the conversion of the templates would be a relatively small task compared to the job of translating. (I've had hours of conversation with people about how to translate VLE into spanish and I don't think we ever did come to a conclusion. It's the word environment that causes the problems since the Spanish equivalent really only refers to outdoors envirnoments, the climate, flora and fauna etc. It's debates like this that slow things down because the only proper solution is to consult people who work in this field in Spain and of course that takes time.) By the way, isn't there an automation tool for converting the templates? Jon |
|
From: Alistair Y. <ali...@sm...> - 2006-03-28 17:57:30
|
Thanks for your kind comments Jon :) The i18n only works for xml templates though. If someone needed the whole site in Spanish it would mean a lot of conversion to new style templates. Then again, that was one of my many jobs, to identify the most used ones from the logs... --=20 Alistair Young Senior Software Engineer UHI@Sabhal M=F2r Ostaig Isle of Skye Scotland > I espa~nolised only the messaging room tool but I have a feeling that > Alistair's (superior) i18n work displaced mine so it probably isn't > going to work now. > > Does someone need Spanish? Thanks to Alistair's work I could do the job > relatively easily although it will take quite some time to complete all > the templates etc. (I also have access to native Spanish speakers with > experience of using Bodington to teach.) > > Jon > > Sean Mehan wrote: > >>I think that maber at one point might have spanished one, but long ago. >> we >>don't have one, of any vintage. >> >>s >> >> >><quote who=3D"Paul Davis"> >> >> >>>DO I remember rightly, or was there at some time a Spanish version of >>>Bodington? I know we want to go towards I18N, but thinking of a >>> quickfix >>>for someone >>> >>>Paul >>> >>>----------------------------------------------------------------------= --- >>>Dr Paul V Davis >>>Acting Head, Learning Technologies Group >>>Project Manager, WebLearn ( Oxford's version of Bodington.org) >>>Oxford University Computing Services >>>13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN >>>Tel: 01865 283414 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting >>>language >>>that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live >>>webcast >>>and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding >>>territory! >>>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&da= t=3D121642 >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Bodington-developers mailing list >>>Bod...@li... >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > |
|
From: Jon M. <jo...@te...> - 2006-03-28 17:56:28
|
Peter Crowther wrote:
>>From: Matthew Buckett
>>But don't we just provide SQL migration?
>>
>>
>
>If you can work out how to rename tables in a portable way, you're doing
>better than I am (SQL Server uses EXEC sp_rename 'oldname', 'newname',
>but there are limitations). Or would you create the new table and move
>all the data and constraints across?
>
>
I think the latter is a perfectly fine upgrade method - were talking
about small amounts of data anyway in the tables in question. There are
version upgrade routines anyway so it won't be hard to add some more
work there;
if ( new tables don't exist)
{
create new tables;
copy records from old tables to new tables.
}
|
|
From: Jon M. <jo...@te...> - 2006-03-28 17:52:04
|
I espa~nolised only the messaging room tool but I have a feeling that Alistair's (superior) i18n work displaced mine so it probably isn't going to work now. Does someone need Spanish? Thanks to Alistair's work I could do the job relatively easily although it will take quite some time to complete all the templates etc. (I also have access to native Spanish speakers with experience of using Bodington to teach.) Jon Sean Mehan wrote: >I think that maber at one point might have spanished one, but long ago. we >don't have one, of any vintage. > >s > > ><quote who="Paul Davis"> > > >>DO I remember rightly, or was there at some time a Spanish version of >>Bodington? I know we want to go towards I18N, but thinking of a quickfix >>for someone >> >>Paul >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>Dr Paul V Davis >>Acting Head, Learning Technologies Group >>Project Manager, WebLearn ( Oxford's version of Bodington.org) >>Oxford University Computing Services >>13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN >>Tel: 01865 283414 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>------------------------------------------------------- >>This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting >>language >>that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live >>webcast >>and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding >>territory! >>http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 >>_______________________________________________ >>Bodington-developers mailing list >>Bod...@li... >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> >> >> > > > > |
|
From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2006-03-28 17:12:29
|
I think that maber at one point might have spanished one, but long ago. w= e don't have one, of any vintage. s <quote who=3D"Paul Davis"> > DO I remember rightly, or was there at some time a Spanish version of > Bodington? I know we want to go towards I18N, but thinking of a quickf= ix > for someone > > Paul > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Dr Paul V Davis > Acting Head, Learning Technologies Group > Project Manager, WebLearn ( Oxford's version of Bodington.org) > Oxford University Computing Services > 13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN > Tel: 01865 283414 > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > --=20 Sean Mehan Head of e-Frameworks Learning and Information Services UHI |
|
From: Paul D. <pau...@ou...> - 2006-03-28 16:38:30
|
DO I remember rightly, or was there at some time a Spanish version of Bodington? I know we want to go towards I18N, but thinking of a quickfix for someone Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Paul V Davis Acting Head, Learning Technologies Group Project Manager, WebLearn ( Oxford's version of Bodington.org) Oxford University Computing Services 13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN Tel: 01865 283414 |
|
From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2006-03-28 16:34:13
|
> From: Matthew Buckett > there isn't a good > way of testing some parts of the Bodington code without=20 > creating 100s of mock objects. Yes. Arguably this is an issue with Bodington, not with the test code... - Peter |
|
From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2006-03-28 16:33:11
|
> From: Sean Mehan > where is the great peter crowther. he usually has an=20 > (un)informed opinion !-) Utterly uninformed, in general - see other email. I think a migration tool is possible, but may have to be DBMS-specific. - Peter |
|
From: Peter C. <Pet...@me...> - 2006-03-28 16:27:05
|
> From: Matthew Buckett > But don't we just provide SQL migration? If you can work out how to rename tables in a portable way, you're doing better than I am (SQL Server uses EXEC sp_rename 'oldname', 'newname', but there are limitations). Or would you create the new table and move all the data and constraints across? - Peter |
|
From: Atif S. <BM...@bm...> - 2006-03-28 15:50:47
|
Matthew Buckett wrote: >>Matthew Buckett wrote: >>Will do, but BuildingServerTest is a bad solution: >> >>................. >>- It isn't really a unit test but an intergration but there isn't a good >>way of testing some parts of the Bodington code without creating 100s of >>mock objects. >> >> >> I agree. Ta Atif. |
|
From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2006-03-28 15:48:25
|
well, in principle, so what?-) i mean, who but us is running!-) and if we agreed, well then, new people wouldn't feel the pain!-) surely we could provide a little tool to port from old to new..... where is the great peter crowther. he usually has an (un)informed opinion= !-) s <quote who=3D"Andrew Booth"> > Generalising the schema is a good idea, but bear in mind that we lose > backward compatibility at that point. > > Aggie > > -----Original Message----- > From: bod...@li... > [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of > Sean > Mehan > Sent: 28 March 2006 15:13 > To: bod...@li... > Cc: bod...@li... > Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] MySQL support now in HEAD > > Greetings from flooding Southern California! > > Aggie, all sounds +. If the peer marker is contained, then I would thin= k a > commit to head would allow for testing and we could see what it does an= d > how well. > > It could always roll back, non? > > I think that Matthew has some strong points here about the MySQL stuff. > Surely it would be better to generalize and work from the *one* schema! > > -s > > > <quote who=3D"Matthew Buckett"> >> Andrew Booth wrote: >>> I have committed MySQL support to HEAD (documentation in docs). >> >> I still feel that having a different database schema for different >> database products is making a rod for our own backs and changing the >> tables to: >> fields -> map_fields >> objects -> map_objects >> classes -> map_classes >> >> (or other) would be a better soloution in the long run. >> >>> Can I have an opinion about committing the peer-marker tool? >> >> I liked the tool. Do you have a patch available to look at? Does it >> change anything outside the new tool? >> >>> Also, I have converted the MCQ tool to the new templates and localise= d >>> the >>> text, both template and in-code. Shall I commit it? >> >> Did you remove the <building> tags or just convert the page to <xml>? >> >> -- >> -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer >> -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services >> -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting >> language >> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live >> webcast >> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding >> territory! >> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&da= t=3D121642 >> _______________________________________________ >> Bodington-developers mailing list >> Bod...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers >> > > > -- > Sean Mehan > Head of e-Frameworks > Learning and Information Services > UHI > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=12164= 2 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > --=20 Sean Mehan Head of e-Frameworks Learning and Information Services UHI |
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@ou...> - 2006-03-28 15:38:15
|
Andrew Booth wrote: > Generalising the schema is a good idea, but bear in mind that we lose > backward compatibility at that point. But don't we just provide SQL migration? -- -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ |
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@ou...> - 2006-03-28 15:37:13
|
Atif Suleman wrote: > Matthew Buckett wrote: > >> I think your patch is better as it extracts the test classpath out. If >> you commit it I'll probably muller it (add HSQLDB and test-init) a >> little so that the BuildingServerTest works but otherwise looks good. >> >> > My patch is commit onto bodington head. It would be cool if we had > BuildingServerTest on head THEN any test that need to do higher level > Bodington code Test could subclass BuildingServerTest AND not worry > about setting up and tearing down bodington database. Will do, but BuildingServerTest is a bad solution: - It's slow which doesn't encourage people to run the tests. - It's complicated which means changing one thing at the database level can break lots of tests. - It isn't really a unit test but an intergration but there isn't a good way of testing some parts of the Bodington code without creating 100s of mock objects. -- -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ |
|
From: Andrew B. <a.g...@le...> - 2006-03-28 15:16:46
|
Generalising the schema is a good idea, but bear in mind that we lose backward compatibility at that point. Aggie -----Original Message----- From: bod...@li... [mailto:bod...@li...] On Behalf Of = Sean Mehan Sent: 28 March 2006 15:13 To: bod...@li... Cc: bod...@li... Subject: Re: [Bodington-developers] MySQL support now in HEAD Greetings from flooding Southern California! Aggie, all sounds +. If the peer marker is contained, then I would think = a commit to head would allow for testing and we could see what it does and how well. It could always roll back, non? I think that Matthew has some strong points here about the MySQL stuff. Surely it would be better to generalize and work from the *one* schema! -s <quote who=3D"Matthew Buckett"> > Andrew Booth wrote: >> I have committed MySQL support to HEAD (documentation in docs). > > I still feel that having a different database schema for different > database products is making a rod for our own backs and changing the > tables to: > fields -> map_fields > objects -> map_objects > classes -> map_classes > > (or other) would be a better soloution in the long run. > >> Can I have an opinion about committing the peer-marker tool? > > I liked the tool. Do you have a patch available to look at? Does it > change anything outside the new tool? > >> Also, I have converted the MCQ tool to the new templates and = localised >> the >> text, both template and in-code. Shall I commit it? > > Did you remove the <building> tags or just convert the page to <xml>? > > -- > -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer > -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services > -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > = http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D= 121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > --=20 Sean Mehan Head of e-Frameworks Learning and Information Services UHI ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting = language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live = webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding = territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dk&kid=110944&bid$1720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Bodington-developers mailing list Bod...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers |
|
From: Atif S. <BM...@bm...> - 2006-03-28 15:05:15
|
Matthew Buckett wrote: >I think your patch is better as it extracts the test classpath out. If >you commit it I'll probably muller it (add HSQLDB and test-init) a >little so that the BuildingServerTest works but otherwise looks good. > > My patch is commit onto bodington head. It would be cool if we had BuildingServerTest on head THEN any test that need to do higher level Bodington code Test could subclass BuildingServerTest AND not worry about setting up and tearing down bodington database. Ta Atif. |
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@ou...> - 2006-03-28 14:34:16
|
Atif Suleman wrote: > Matthew Buckett wrote: > >>Atif Suleman wrote: >> >> >>>Hi >>> >>>Would anyone have a problem IF I pushed the following onto bodington head? >>> >>> >> >>Yes unless you are going to commit some JUnit tests as well ;-) >> >>What have you written tests for? >> > The following at the moment: > * GroupsMapperEngineTest.java > * GroupsMapperPolicyTest.java Nice. >>Attached is the current WebLearn build.xml and I think we had the tests >>working almost identically. Also attached is BuildingServerTest which >>allows you to do intergration tests on some of the higher level >>Bodington code. >> > Cool. How about pushing your build.xml junit work onto bodington head > and also BuildingServerTest. I think your patch is better as it extracts the test classpath out. If you commit it I'll probably muller it (add HSQLDB and test-init) a little so that the BuildingServerTest works but otherwise looks good. -- -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ |
|
From: Sean M. <se...@sm...> - 2006-03-28 14:13:50
|
Greetings from flooding Southern California! Aggie, all sounds +. If the peer marker is contained, then I would think = a commit to head would allow for testing and we could see what it does and how well. It could always roll back, non? I think that Matthew has some strong points here about the MySQL stuff. Surely it would be better to generalize and work from the *one* schema! -s <quote who=3D"Matthew Buckett"> > Andrew Booth wrote: >> I have committed MySQL support to HEAD (documentation in docs). > > I still feel that having a different database schema for different > database products is making a rod for our own backs and changing the > tables to: > fields -> map_fields > objects -> map_objects > classes -> map_classes > > (or other) would be a better soloution in the long run. > >> Can I have an opinion about committing the peer-marker tool? > > I liked the tool. Do you have a patch available to look at? Does it > change anything outside the new tool? > >> Also, I have converted the MCQ tool to the new templates and localised >> the >> text, both template and in-code. Shall I commit it? > > Did you remove the <building> tags or just convert the page to <xml>? > > -- > -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer > -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services > -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Bodington-developers mailing list > Bod...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bodington-developers > --=20 Sean Mehan Head of e-Frameworks Learning and Information Services UHI |
|
From: Andrew B. <a.g...@le...> - 2006-03-28 14:08:24
|
>> I have committed MySQL support to HEAD (documentation in docs). >I still feel that having a different database schema for different >database products is making a rod for our own backs and changing the >tables to: >fields -> map_fields >objects -> map_objects >classes -> map_classes > >(or other) would be a better soloution in the long run. I agree - and I put a comment to that effect in the code >> Can I have an opinion about committing the peer-marker tool? >I liked the tool. Do you have a patch available to look at? Does it >change anything outside the new tool? No - I don't have a patch (yet). I have tried to keep the changes outside the tool to a minimum. (e.g. I subclassed Faculty rather than adding yet more code to it.) >> Also, I have converted the MCQ tool to the new templates and localised the >> text, both template and in-code. Shall I commit it? >Did you remove the <building> tags or just convert the page to <xml>? Removed the <building> tags and converted everything to the new format. Aggie |
|
From: Atif S. <BM...@bm...> - 2006-03-28 14:06:23
|
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Matthew Buckett wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid...@ou..." type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Atif Suleman wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi
Would anyone have a problem IF I pushed the following onto bodington head?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Yes unless you are going to commit some JUnit tests as well ;-)
What have you written tests for?</pre>
</blockquote>
The following at the moment:<br>
* GroupsMapperEngineTest.java<br>
* GroupsMapperPolicyTest.java<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Attached is the current WebLearn build.xml and I think we had the tests
working almost identically. Also attached is BuildingServerTest which
allows you to do intergration tests on some of the higher level
Bodington code.</pre>
</blockquote>
Cool. How about pushing your build.xml junit work onto bodington head
and also BuildingServerTest.<br>
<br>
<br>
Ta<br>
Atif.<br>
</body>
</html>
|
|
From: Matthew B. <mat...@ou...> - 2006-03-28 13:39:54
|
Andrew Booth wrote: > I have committed MySQL support to HEAD (documentation in docs). I still feel that having a different database schema for different database products is making a rod for our own backs and changing the tables to: fields -> map_fields objects -> map_objects classes -> map_classes (or other) would be a better soloution in the long run. > Can I have an opinion about committing the peer-marker tool? I liked the tool. Do you have a patch available to look at? Does it change anything outside the new tool? > Also, I have converted the MCQ tool to the new templates and localised the > text, both template and in-code. Shall I commit it? Did you remove the <building> tags or just convert the page to <xml>? -- -- Matthew Buckett, VLE Developer -- Learning Technologies Group, Oxford University Computing Services -- Tel: +44 (0)1865 283660 http://www.oucs.ox.ac.uk/ltg/ |
19 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
