Menu
▾
▴
bitpim-devel — For bitpim developers
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(53) |
Apr
(48) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(77) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(28) |
Dec
(163) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 |
Jan
(112) |
Feb
(143) |
Mar
(114) |
Apr
(138) |
May
(173) |
Jun
(119) |
Jul
(119) |
Aug
(117) |
Sep
(187) |
Oct
(170) |
Nov
(254) |
Dec
(193) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(336) |
Feb
(284) |
Mar
(189) |
Apr
(100) |
May
(89) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(85) |
Aug
(138) |
Sep
(181) |
Oct
(137) |
Nov
(104) |
Dec
(98) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(76) |
Feb
(106) |
Mar
(224) |
Apr
(270) |
May
(103) |
Jun
(144) |
Jul
(77) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(14) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(130) |
Feb
(68) |
Mar
(78) |
Apr
(60) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(84) |
Aug
(45) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(71) |
Dec
(56) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(44) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(60) |
Jul
(97) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(20) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(37) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(4) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(5) |
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Nathan H. <hj...@ma...> - 2009-03-06 19:59:38
|
Forgot the include my ffmpeg configuration options: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --enable-static --enable-libfaac -- enable-libfaad --enable-libmp3lame --enable-gpl -Nathan |
|
From: Nathan H. <hj...@ma...> - 2009-03-06 19:58:54
|
Attached is a modified version of ffmpeg's configure script. It uses libavcodec/allcodecs_dis.c to turn off unwanted codecs. Much simpler than using --disable-encoder :D. I was able to save about 3MB on the universal binary by disabling these codecs. The only video codec not disabled is the h264 encoder/decoder as it is needed by the h264 parser (might be useful for extracting audio out of video files). -Nathan On Mar 6, 2009, at 11:52 AM, Stephen Wood wrote: > Let me know what you turn off and how so that I can do the same to > the Linux binary to keep its size down too. > > Stephen > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Nathan Hjelm <hj...@ma...> wrote: > Done. The binary is a little big (10 MB) but thats the cost of a > universal binary. I will try to make a smaller one by turning off some > of ffmpeg's features (most video formats since we don't need them at > the moment) later today. > > -Nathan > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H_______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: Stephen W. <bi...@gm...> - 2009-03-06 18:53:15
|
Let me know what you turn off and how so that I can do the same to the Linux binary to keep its size down too. Stephen On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Nathan Hjelm <hj...@ma...> wrote: > Done. The binary is a little big (10 MB) but thats the cost of a > universal binary. I will try to make a smaller one by turning off some > of ffmpeg's features (most video formats since we don't need them at > the moment) later today. > > -Nathan |
|
From: Sean P. B. <sea...@gm...> - 2009-03-06 18:44:47
|
Not a problem Nathan. I'll try a build this afternoon to make sure everything is running smoothly. s -- Sean Patrick Burke Full time law student, part time developer http://www.bitpim.org On Mar 6, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > Done. The binary is a little big (10 MB) but thats the cost of a > universal binary. I will try to make a smaller one by turning off some > of ffmpeg's features (most video formats since we don't need them at > the moment) later today. > > -Nathan > > On Mar 6, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Sean Patrick Burke wrote: > >> Nathan, >> If you have a build ready, that's fine otherwise I can build a new >> one. Your call. >> >> Sean >> -- >> Sean Patrick Burke >> Full time law student, part time developer >> http://www.bitpim.org >> >> >> >> >> On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:04 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: >> >>> I uploaded some of the mpeg4 code to SVN but will hold off on the >>> rest >>> of the updates until the new builds off ffmpeg are ready. >>> >>> I will upload the updated ffmpeg.mbin (universal, svn ffmpeg, >>> mp3lame >>> 3.98, libfaac 1.28, libfaad 2.7) unless Sean wants to handle that. >>> As >>> for the Linux version, I can build one on Monday for x86_64. Is the >>> current build a x86_64 binary or just i386? >>> >>> -Nathan >>> >>> On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Joe Pham wrote: >>> >>>>> I propose we change it to use ffmpeg -vol. >>>> >>>> I'm all for it, though I'd need Stephen to build the Linux version. >>>> My laptop died so I lost access to all of my Linux partitions. >>>> btw, >>>> I'm still working with Sean to upload his Mac builds for the test >>>> release. >>>> >>>> -Joe Pham >>>> >>>> >>>> ____________________________________________________________ >>>> Fashion Design Education - Click Here! >>>> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxaFaAziHeDqUqEiOfudycny8Qnj5QFn4xF6GAfdoYWRMlh5r2uYaE/ >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San >>>> Francisco, CA >>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >>>> Enterprise >>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >>>> participation >>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source >>>> code: SFAD >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> BitPim-devel mailing list >>>> Bit...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San >>> Francisco, CA >>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >>> Enterprise >>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >>> participation >>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source >>> code: SFAD >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BitPim-devel mailing list >>> Bit...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San >> Francisco, CA >> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >> Enterprise >> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >> participation >> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source >> code: SFAD >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >> _______________________________________________ >> BitPim-devel mailing list >> Bit...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: Nathan H. <hj...@ma...> - 2009-03-06 18:37:26
|
Done. The binary is a little big (10 MB) but thats the cost of a universal binary. I will try to make a smaller one by turning off some of ffmpeg's features (most video formats since we don't need them at the moment) later today. -Nathan On Mar 6, 2009, at 10:38 AM, Sean Patrick Burke wrote: > Nathan, > If you have a build ready, that's fine otherwise I can build a new > one. Your call. > > Sean > -- > Sean Patrick Burke > Full time law student, part time developer > http://www.bitpim.org > > > > > On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:04 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > >> I uploaded some of the mpeg4 code to SVN but will hold off on the >> rest >> of the updates until the new builds off ffmpeg are ready. >> >> I will upload the updated ffmpeg.mbin (universal, svn ffmpeg, mp3lame >> 3.98, libfaac 1.28, libfaad 2.7) unless Sean wants to handle that. As >> for the Linux version, I can build one on Monday for x86_64. Is the >> current build a x86_64 binary or just i386? >> >> -Nathan >> >> On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Joe Pham wrote: >> >>>> I propose we change it to use ffmpeg -vol. >>> >>> I'm all for it, though I'd need Stephen to build the Linux version. >>> My laptop died so I lost access to all of my Linux partitions. btw, >>> I'm still working with Sean to upload his Mac builds for the test >>> release. >>> >>> -Joe Pham >>> >>> >>> ____________________________________________________________ >>> Fashion Design Education - Click Here! >>> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxaFaAziHeDqUqEiOfudycny8Qnj5QFn4xF6GAfdoYWRMlh5r2uYaE/ >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San >>> Francisco, CA >>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >>> Enterprise >>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >>> participation >>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source >>> code: SFAD >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >>> _______________________________________________ >>> BitPim-devel mailing list >>> Bit...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San >> Francisco, CA >> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >> Enterprise >> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >> participation >> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source >> code: SFAD >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >> _______________________________________________ >> BitPim-devel mailing list >> Bit...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: Sean P. B. <sea...@gm...> - 2009-03-06 17:38:20
|
Nathan, If you have a build ready, that's fine otherwise I can build a new one. Your call. Sean -- Sean Patrick Burke Full time law student, part time developer http://www.bitpim.org On Mar 5, 2009, at 11:04 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > I uploaded some of the mpeg4 code to SVN but will hold off on the rest > of the updates until the new builds off ffmpeg are ready. > > I will upload the updated ffmpeg.mbin (universal, svn ffmpeg, mp3lame > 3.98, libfaac 1.28, libfaad 2.7) unless Sean wants to handle that. As > for the Linux version, I can build one on Monday for x86_64. Is the > current build a x86_64 binary or just i386? > > -Nathan > > On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Joe Pham wrote: > >>> I propose we change it to use ffmpeg -vol. >> >> I'm all for it, though I'd need Stephen to build the Linux version. >> My laptop died so I lost access to all of my Linux partitions. btw, >> I'm still working with Sean to upload his Mac builds for the test >> release. >> >> -Joe Pham >> >> >> ____________________________________________________________ >> Fashion Design Education - Click Here! >> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxaFaAziHeDqUqEiOfudycny8Qnj5QFn4xF6GAfdoYWRMlh5r2uYaE/ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San >> Francisco, CA >> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >> Enterprise >> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >> participation >> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source >> code: SFAD >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >> _______________________________________________ >> BitPim-devel mailing list >> Bit...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: Nathan H. <hj...@ma...> - 2009-03-06 04:07:33
|
git ffmpeg: http://www.ffmpeg.org/download.html (not sure where the get a release-- they claim no such thing exists) lame 3.98: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=290&package_id=309 (3.98.2 is buggy) faac 1.28, faad 2.7: http://www.audiocoding.com/downloads.html -Nathan On Mar 5, 2009, at 8:59 PM, Stephen Wood wrote: > Point me to the sources and I'll build it on the oldest Linux I can > find. > > Stephen > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Joe Pham <dj...@ne...> wrote: > >I propose we change it to use ffmpeg -vol. > > I'm all for it, though I'd need Stephen to build the Linux version. > My laptop died so I lost access to all of my Linux partitions. btw, > I'm still working with Sean to upload his Mac builds for the test > release. > > -Joe Pham > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H_______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: Nathan H. <hj...@ma...> - 2009-03-06 04:04:32
|
I uploaded some of the mpeg4 code to SVN but will hold off on the rest of the updates until the new builds off ffmpeg are ready. I will upload the updated ffmpeg.mbin (universal, svn ffmpeg, mp3lame 3.98, libfaac 1.28, libfaad 2.7) unless Sean wants to handle that. As for the Linux version, I can build one on Monday for x86_64. Is the current build a x86_64 binary or just i386? -Nathan On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:57 PM, Joe Pham wrote: >> I propose we change it to use ffmpeg -vol. > > I'm all for it, though I'd need Stephen to build the Linux version. > My laptop died so I lost access to all of my Linux partitions. btw, > I'm still working with Sean to upload his Mac builds for the test > release. > > -Joe Pham > > > ____________________________________________________________ > Fashion Design Education - Click Here! > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxaFaAziHeDqUqEiOfudycny8Qnj5QFn4xF6GAfdoYWRMlh5r2uYaE/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: Stephen W. <bi...@gm...> - 2009-03-06 03:59:09
|
Point me to the sources and I'll build it on the oldest Linux I can find. Stephen On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Joe Pham <dj...@ne...> wrote: > >I propose we change it to use ffmpeg -vol. > > I'm all for it, though I'd need Stephen to build the Linux version. My > laptop died so I lost access to all of my Linux partitions. btw, I'm still > working with Sean to upload his Mac builds for the test release. > > -Joe Pham > > > |
|
From: Al <al...@te...> - 2009-03-06 03:16:24
|
Hi, I've extracted the information for the following Telus phones, sch-a870, sch-a650 and sph-a540. I need assistance to figure out the entries in the configuration files in the phones directory, I've built files based on the sph-a80 someone else made for a TELUS phone (his comments imply that these are "different") and can ID the phone (gets the banner with correct models, etc), reading address book gets a page of errors that I've not quite figured out how to deal with yet. I'm new to python and this isn't a small piece of entry level code, I'm willing to make modifications and test it, but would appreciate some input on the direction to head in and possibly what I should be looking for in the phone files from others before me. Thanks Ps. If I can make these work I'm looking at also adding an sch-u540, I'm leaving it for the moment as it doesn't seem to respond properly to the AT commands as the other 3 did. |
|
From: Joe P. <dj...@ne...> - 2009-03-05 23:59:36
|
>I propose we change it to use ffmpeg -vol. I'm all for it, though I'd need Stephen to build the Linux version. My laptop died so I lost access to all of my Linux partitions. btw, I'm still working with Sean to upload his Mac builds for the test release. -Joe Pham ____________________________________________________________ Fashion Design Education - Click Here! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxaFaAziHeDqUqEiOfudycny8Qnj5QFn4xF6GAfdoYWRMlh5r2uYaE/ |
|
From: Nathan H. <hj...@ma...> - 2009-03-05 21:00:19
|
I find that adjustwavfilevolume is horribly slow on my macbook pro so
I propose we change it to use ffmpeg -vol. This change will require a
new build off ffmpeg for each platform (I have a universal binary for
macos x ready). The speed increase is more than an order of magnitude
(it took around 60 seconds to start playing a 260 second song with the
old routine and it now takes about a second).
Here is the updated routine:
def adjustwavfilevolume(wavfilename, gain):
""" Ajdust the volume of a wav file.
"""
temp_name=common.gettempfilename("wav")
ffmpeg=gethelperbinary ("ffmpeg")
run(ffmpeg, "-i", wavfilename, "-vol", `int(pow(10.0, gain/10.0)
* 256.0)`, temp_name)
os.remove(wavfilename)
os.rename(temp_name, wavfilename)
Additionally, since I want to add support for mpeg4 (AAC audio)
ringtones support since all new phone models support them (I have
already finished the code). AAC sounds better than mp3 at comparable
bitrates. AAC support requires that the new build of ffmpeg has
support for libfaac and libfaad.
Any comments?
-Nathan Hjelm
|
|
From: Nathan H. <hj...@ma...> - 2009-03-03 04:53:53
|
Interesting, the Versa doesn't rewrite the ringtone index on each boot. It appears the Versa only rebuilds the index if there is a problem with the current index (trying to add a .m4a file triggers a rebuild). This allows the old external ringer hack to work once more! As an added bonus the phone can use mpeg4 ringtones that have a .mp4 extension (the .m4a doesn't work-- the audio files have to be renamed). The Dare is also able to play mpeg4 tones so perhaps it is time to add mpeg4 support to bitpim? -Nathan On Mar 1, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > Added. As far as file formats go the Versa is identical to the Dare. > > -Nathan > > On Feb 28, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Joe Pham wrote: > >>> I want to know if anyone else (bitpim developer) already has one to >>> play with or is planning on purchasing one? >> >> Not that I'm aware. I may get a loaner but not by this weekend, so >> go for it. >> >> -Joe Pham >> >> >> ____________________________________________________________ >> Be there without being there. Click now for great video conferencing >> solutions! >> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxPnB5wX044Y6pQCRAm5J10yB7mVLBJmYj7xWrOQxZKlneUWwoZdaI/ >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San >> Francisco, CA >> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the >> Enterprise >> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source >> participation >> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source >> code: SFAD >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H >> _______________________________________________ >> BitPim-devel mailing list >> Bit...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: Nathan H. <hj...@ma...> - 2009-03-01 21:15:04
|
Added. As far as file formats go the Versa is identical to the Dare. -Nathan On Feb 28, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Joe Pham wrote: >> I want to know if anyone else (bitpim developer) already has one to >> play with or is planning on purchasing one? > > Not that I'm aware. I may get a loaner but not by this weekend, so > go for it. > > -Joe Pham > > > ____________________________________________________________ > Be there without being there. Click now for great video conferencing > solutions! > http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxPnB5wX044Y6pQCRAm5J10yB7mVLBJmYj7xWrOQxZKlneUWwoZdaI/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San > Francisco, CA > -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the > Enterprise > -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source > participation > -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source > code: SFAD > http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H > _______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: Joe P. <dj...@ne...> - 2009-02-28 21:24:58
|
>I want to know if anyone else (bitpim developer) already has one to >play with or is planning on purchasing one? Not that I'm aware. I may get a loaner but not by this weekend, so go for it. -Joe Pham ____________________________________________________________ Be there without being there. Click now for great video conferencing solutions! http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL2231/fc/BLSrjnxPnB5wX044Y6pQCRAm5J10yB7mVLBJmYj7xWrOQxZKlneUWwoZdaI/ |
|
From: Nathan H. <hj...@ma...> - 2009-02-27 20:30:28
|
I am thinking about picking up an LG Versa on Sunday to start working on support. To avoid duplicate efforts I want to know if anyone else (bitpim developer) already has one to play with or is planning on purchasing one? If not I should have support ready by the end of the weekend. -Nathan |
|
From: MBR <mb...@ar...> - 2009-02-08 20:50:10
|
About a week ago I submitted stack traces of a crash in BitPim. Since then, there's been no indication that anyone's received what I sent. I do understand that everyone here is a volunteer. And I most certainly don't want to replicate the behavior of the sort of people described at http://www.bitpim.org/help "No support on bitpim-user", where it describes the offensive behavior of the people who became the reason nobody's willing to even try to help with serial port issues any more. Nevertheless, having submitted stack traces and received no acknowledgement that anyone got them has the feeling of sending them into a black hole. I'd be satisfied, even if the response was something like, "We got your bug report, but we don't have anyone available to look at it, and we have no idea whether or when we ever will." Of course, I'd be even happier if someone familiar with the code were actually available to look at the crash. Mark Rosenthal MBR wrote: > I just encountered an exception when trying to fetch the phonebook > from an LG VX-5400 using BitPim 1.0.6. I installed BitPim > 1.0.7.20081215 over the previous version and again encountered the > same exception. I've compared the stack traces and they seem to be > identical except for the hex addresses of the objects. > > I suspect the following information is unlikely to be relevant, but > I'm including it just in case: > > OS: Windows XP Pro, Service Pack 2 > Connection via Bluetooth > > I'm not set up to debug BitPim at the moment, and I haven't yet > learned Python. But if there are specific tests you want me to run > with this phone, just send me instructions and I'll be happy to do > what I can. > > Mark Rosenthal > mb...@ar... <mailto:mb...@ar...> > |
|
From: MBR <mb...@ar...> - 2009-01-31 19:10:17
|
Thanks a lot for your quick response. I just found the page at http://www.bitpim.org/help/versionhistory.htm, which shows the following: LG VX-5400 Ver. 1.0.3 New phone support Ver. 1.0.4 Bug fix: display wrong caller ID number. LG VX-8610 Ver. 1.0.6 New Phone support Your email was explicit that I should use "the most recent test build of Bitpim," which would be Release 1.0.7.20081215, but the change list for that release at http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=75211&release_id=648738 <http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=75211&release_id=648738>, doesn't mention any changes that would affect either the LG VX-5400 or the LG VX-8610. Are there changes relevant to the 8610 or the 5400 that aren't listed at http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=75211&release_id=648738 <http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id=75211&release_id=648738>? If not, wouldn't I be better off using the stable version (1.0.6) rather than the test version (1.0.7.20081215)? Mark <http://www.bitpim.org/#download> Sean Patrick Burke wrote: > The 8610 and 5400 are both supported by the most recent test build of > Bitpim. If the phones support a bluetooth connection, then you > should probably be able to connect to them. > > Hope this helps, > > Sean > -- > Sean Patrick Burke > Full time law student, part time developer > http://www.bitpim.org > > > > > On Jan 30, 2009, at 2:49 PM, MBR wrote: > >> I just looked for the LG VX-5400 in the navigation tree at >> http://www.bitpim.org/help, and couldn't find it listed. But a >> series of emails in this group from 11/18/2007 (Subject: Newly >> released VX5400 appears to be similar to Bitpim's LG-VX8550) through >> 1/7/2008 (Subject: VX5400 /pim/pbnumber.dat caller-id lookup problem) >> seem to indicate that work was being done on this model, and that it >> was similar to the VX-8550. http://www.bitpim.org/help warns: >> >> *My phone is not in the list* >> >> You should select your exact phone in the list, ... >> >> Picking "similar" phones means you are experimenting and >> could end up with problems such as your phone locking up with >> a worst case of it becoming completely inoperable. >> >> So I don't want to try a similar but not identical model number. And >> I don't know what to infer from the fact that neither the LG VX-5400 >> nor the LG VX-8550 is listed at http://www.bitpim.org/help. >> >> It could mean that the development discussed in the aforementioned >> series of emails was abandoned because someone decided the phone >> simply couldn't be properly supported. Or it could mean that those >> models are supported but nobody ever got around to writing the >> documentation. >> >> Does anyone know whether I can safely use BitPim with an LG VX-5400? >> If so, does it know the phone by that name, by the name VX-8550, or what? >> >> Mark Rosenthal >> mb...@ar... <mailto:mb...@ar...> >> >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: [BitPim-devel] VX5400 /pim/pbnumber.dat caller-id >> lookup problem >> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:04:52 GMT >> From: Joe Pham <dj...@ne...> >> Reply-To: bit...@li... >> To: bit...@li... >> >> >> >> >caller-id lookup on the VX5400 with Bitpim version 1.04 official is >> >now working correctly. >> >> Thanks for the testing and the feedback. >> >> -Joe Pham >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: >> SourcForge Community >> SourceForge wants to tell your story. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword_______________________________________________ >> BitPim-devel mailing list >> Bit...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel > |
|
From: Sean P. B. <sea...@gm...> - 2009-01-31 03:50:42
|
The 8610 and 5400 are both supported by the most recent test build of Bitpim. If the phones support a bluetooth connection, then you should probably be able to connect to them. Hope this helps, Sean -- Sean Patrick Burke Full time law student, part time developer http://www.bitpim.org On Jan 30, 2009, at 2:49 PM, MBR wrote: > I just looked for the LG VX-5400 in the navigation tree at http://www.bitpim.org/help > , and couldn't find it listed. But a series of emails in this group > from 11/18/2007 (Subject: Newly released VX5400 appears to be > similar to Bitpim's LG-VX8550) through 1/7/2008 (Subject: VX5400 / > pim/pbnumber.dat caller-id lookup problem) seem to indicate that > work was being done on this model, and that it was similar to the > VX-8550. http://www.bitpim.org/help warns: > My phone is not in the list > > You should select your exact phone in the list, ... > > Picking "similar" phones means you are experimenting and could end > up with problems such as your phone locking up with a worst case of > it becoming completely inoperable. > So I don't want to try a similar but not identical model number. > And I don't know what to infer from the fact that neither the LG > VX-5400 nor the LG VX-8550 is listed at http://www.bitpim.org/help. > > It could mean that the development discussed in the aforementioned > series of emails was abandoned because someone decided the phone > simply couldn't be properly supported. Or it could mean that those > models are supported but nobody ever got around to writing the > documentation. > > Does anyone know whether I can safely use BitPim with an LG > VX-5400? If so, does it know the phone by that name, by the name > VX-8550, or what? > Mark Rosenthal > mb...@ar... > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [BitPim-devel] VX5400 /pim/pbnumber.dat caller-id > lookup problem > Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:04:52 GMT > From: Joe Pham <dj...@ne...> > Reply-To: bit...@li... > To: bit...@li... > > >caller-id lookup on the VX5400 with Bitpim version 1.04 official is > >now working correctly. > > Thanks for the testing and the feedback. > > -Joe Pham > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword_______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: MBR <mb...@ar...> - 2009-01-30 21:14:29
|
I have two LG phones: the LG Dare (VX-8610) and the LG VX-5400. Both
claim to have some level of support for Bluetooth. Can BitPim
communicate with either or both of these phones using Bluetooth? Or
must I get a USB data cable and the appropriate Windows device driver in
order to use BitPim?
Mark Rosenthal
mb...@ar... <mailto:mb...@ar...>
|
|
From: MBR <mb...@ar...> - 2009-01-30 20:41:50
|
I just looked for the LG VX-5400 in the navigation tree at http://www.bitpim.org/help, and couldn't find it listed. But a series of emails in this group from 11/18/2007 (Subject: Newly released VX5400 appears to be similar to Bitpim's LG-VX8550) through 1/7/2008 (Subject: VX5400 /pim/pbnumber.dat caller-id lookup problem) seem to indicate that work was being done on this model, and that it was similar to the VX-8550. http://www.bitpim.org/help warns: *My phone is not in the list* You should select your exact phone in the list, ... Picking "similar" phones means you are experimenting and could end up with problems such as your phone locking up with a worst case of it becoming completely inoperable. So I don't want to try a similar but not identical model number. And I don't know what to infer from the fact that neither the LG VX-5400 nor the LG VX-8550 is listed at http://www.bitpim.org/help. It could mean that the development discussed in the aforementioned series of emails was abandoned because someone decided the phone simply couldn't be properly supported. Or it could mean that those models are supported but nobody ever got around to writing the documentation. Does anyone know whether I can safely use BitPim with an LG VX-5400? If so, does it know the phone by that name, by the name VX-8550, or what? Mark Rosenthal mb...@ar... <mailto:mb...@ar...> -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [BitPim-devel] VX5400 /pim/pbnumber.dat caller-id lookup problem Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 00:04:52 GMT From: Joe Pham <dj...@ne...> Reply-To: bit...@li... To: bit...@li... >caller-id lookup on the VX5400 with Bitpim version 1.04 official is >now working correctly. Thanks for the testing and the feedback. -Joe Pham |
|
From: Sean P. B. <sea...@gm...> - 2009-01-28 02:29:34
|
Ryan, Check in the Bluetooth section of System Preferences. It is different for each version, so you'll need to use the help browser in OS X for specific details. Best, Sean -- Sean Patrick Burke Full time law student, part time developer http://www.bitpim.org On Jan 27, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Ryanocerous wrote: > > Hi, > I am relatively ignorant about connecting my phone and mac. I was > able to > get an LG8550 to work with bitpim via bluetooth, but cannot figure > out my > samsung sch u740. can you explain how you made the port on your mac? > > much thanks!!! > Ryan > > > Developers, > > after using BitPim for pc for previous cdma phones, and after making > the switch to mac, i decided to use BitPim for my newest phone, the > samsung sch u740 or the Alias as verizon now calls it. i didn't have > the usb cable for it so i looked into bluetooth. turns out that the > u740 works fine. it syncs everything properly with no errors. but for > it to work, the mac needs to make a port for it, but that can be done > using the bluetooth setup assistant in system preferences. i dont know > about any other phones, but i will look into it. > > hope this was a helpful addition. > > Chris Sackes > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/samsung-sch-u740-discovery-%28for-mac%29-tp18973839p21693452.html > Sent from the Bitpim - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ > BitPim-devel mailing list > Bit...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitpim-devel |
|
From: Ryanocerous <rya...@ma...> - 2009-01-27 20:12:38
|
Hi, I am relatively ignorant about connecting my phone and mac. I was able to get an LG8550 to work with bitpim via bluetooth, but cannot figure out my samsung sch u740. can you explain how you made the port on your mac? much thanks!!! Ryan Developers, after using BitPim for pc for previous cdma phones, and after making the switch to mac, i decided to use BitPim for my newest phone, the samsung sch u740 or the Alias as verizon now calls it. i didn't have the usb cable for it so i looked into bluetooth. turns out that the u740 works fine. it syncs everything properly with no errors. but for it to work, the mac needs to make a port for it, but that can be done using the bluetooth setup assistant in system preferences. i dont know about any other phones, but i will look into it. hope this was a helpful addition. Chris Sackes -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/samsung-sch-u740-discovery-%28for-mac%29-tp18973839p21693452.html Sent from the Bitpim - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: <si...@mu...> - 2009-01-23 21:14:36
|
As stock I have not been able to get BitPim to connect to this phone, but poking around on the BT DUN connection I have had some luck. Perhaps this is enough info to get something work, or if there is some more testing to be done let me know. The BT DUN port will drop out if the serial connection is dropped, so this is why I think BitPim is having a problem. Using Blue Soliel on WinXP I can 'connect to DUN' but instead of entering number details I use hyperterm to connect to appropriate COM port (COM19 in my case) The following is a hyperterm log -- ati Manufacturer: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. Model: SCH-U510/29 Revision: U510. 1 [May 26 2005 18:00:00] ESN: 0x168----- +GCAP: +CIS707-A, CIS-856, +MS, +ES, +DS, +FCLASS OK AT#PMODE=1 OK AT#PBOKR=1 #PBOKR: 1,40,"SIMON WOOD ",0,1,,0,0,14---------,0,14---------,0,,0,14---------,0 ,"SWood@---------.ca",0,"http://www.--------",0,"",0,20071217T151602 OK -- So that it looks like something is possible with this phone. Cheers, Mungewell. |
|
From: Don L. <dl...@la...> - 2008-12-23 16:58:42
|
I wanted to copy out the SMS data from the view filesystem on a Kyocera K132 and I get this. I tried to save it several times, using differedt methods available, from the SMS folder, the text folder using backup options, and from the file level using save and hex dump. Each attempted resulted in an error.
I inserted a image and the trouble report.
Thanks,
Don L.
_____
BitPim version: 1.0.6-official
An unexpected exception has occurred.
Please see the help for details on what to do.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "gui.pyo", line 284, in run
File "gui.pyo", line 159, in __call__
File "gui.pyo", line 2061, in getfile
File "phones\com_brew.pyo", line 654, in getfilecontents
File "phones\com_brew.pyo", line 852, in sendbrewcommand
File "phones\p_brew.pyo", line 397, in readfrombuffer
File "phones\p_brew.pyo", line 174, in readfrombuffer
File "prototypes.pyo", line 236, in readfrombuffer
ValueError: The value read should be a constant of 89, but was 66 instead
Variables by last 8 frames, innermost last
Frame run in gui.pyo at line 290
resultcb = <gui.Callback instance at 0x07F2BC38>
res = None
self = <WorkerThread(BitPim helper, started daemon)>
item = (<gui.Request instance at 0x07F2B558>, <gui.Callback instance at 0x07F2BC38>)
call = <gui.Request instance at 0x07F2B558>
ex = ValueError('The value read should be a constant of 89, but was 66 instead',)
e = ValueError('The value read should be a constant of 89, but was 66 instead',)
first = 0
Frame __call__ in gui.pyo at line 159
self = <gui.Request instance at 0x07F2B558>
args = ()
d = Keys []
{}
kwargs = Keys []
{}
Frame getfile in gui.pyo at line 2061
path = u'user/sms/automsg/en.dat'
self = <WorkerThread(BitPim helper, started daemon)>
Frame getfilecontents in phones\com_brew.pyo at line 654
use_cache = False
self = <phones.com_othercdma.Phone object at 0x07F25730>
req = <phones.p_brew.readfilerequest object at 0x07F25B30>
start = 1230051279.0309999
file = u'user/sms/automsg/en.dat'
data = <cStringIO.StringO object at 0x07F25240>
desc = u'Reading user/sms/automsg/en.dat'
Frame sendbrewcommand in phones\com_brew.pyo at line 857
origdata = 'BY\x04\x00\x18user/sms/aut\x1f\xfd~'
d = -1
responseclass = <class 'phones.p_brew.readfileresponse'>
buffer = <prototypes.buffer object at 0x07F25A90>
res = <phones.p_brew.readfileresponse object at 0x07F25AF0>
callsetmode = True
request = <phones.p_brew.readfilerequest object at 0x07F25B30>
firsttwo = 'Y\x04'
data = 'BY\x04\x00\x18user/sms/aut'
crc = '\x1f\xfd'
calccrc = '\x1f\xfd'
self = <phones.com_othercdma.Phone object at 0x07F25730>
Frame readfrombuffer in phones\p_brew.pyo at line 397
buf = <prototypes.buffer object at 0x07F25A90>
autolog = False
logtitle = '<read data>'
self = <phones.p_brew.readfileresponse object at 0x07F25AF0>
Frame readfrombuffer in phones\p_brew.pyo at line 174
buf = <prototypes.buffer object at 0x07F25A90>
autolog = True
logtitle = '<read data>'
self = <phones.p_brew.responseheader object at 0x07F258F0>
Frame readfrombuffer in prototypes.pyo at line 236
buf = <prototypes.buffer object at 0x07F25A90>
dummy = 0
self = <prototypes.UINTlsb object at 0x07F25B50>
res = 66
shift = 8
_____
|
107 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
