Re: [Audacity-quality] Lobbying for inclusion in 2.3.0

[Cliff <fly...@gm...>]

Just started a talk page regarding bugs and improvements to metadata handling in Audacity. Please excuse me if the format isn’t normal. Feel free to fix what ever needs fixing. I’m hoping we can make some real improvements in this area.

https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/User_talk:Cliff_Scott#Discussion_about_Metadata_fixes_and_improvements.

Cliff

> On Mar 23, 2018, at 19:13, Cliff <fly...@gm...> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mar 23, 2018, at 03:56, James Crook <cr...@in... <mailto:cr...@in...>> wrote:
>> 
>> On 3/23/2018 3:17 AM, Cliff wrote:
>>> James,
>>> 
>>> BTW, how does one get that “table report” you mention? I can see a list of bugs related to metadata easliy, but other than just putting them in a list by link and bug number how would I get that report?
>>> 
>>> Cliff
>> 
>> Use a template like this one, and replace the bug numbers with the ones that matter to you:
>> 
>> {{#bugzilla:
>> |id=1854,1807,1793,1745,1742,1709,1238,1237,901,878,876,628,549,548,526,294
>> |disablecache=1
>> |columns=id,priority,status,summary,id
>> }}
> 
> Thanks. Just what I needed.
> 
> Cliff
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Mar 21, 2018, at 23:26, Cliff <fly...@gm... <mailto:fly...@gm...>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Ok. Will try to do it tomorrow.
>>>> 
>>>> Cliff
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 21, 2018, at 09:26, James Crook <cr...@in... <mailto:cr...@in...>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Metadata dialog off by default, which is mentioned on that page, is a quick easy fix, and I am very inclined to do that fix.
>>>>> Doing more for meta data I think needs review of metadata bugs. Developers work most effectively when they work on several aspects of one feature, so to lobby better, perhaps on the talk page collect a bugzilla report table on metadata bugs/issues.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --James.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 3/21/2018 1:31 PM, Cliff wrote:
>>>>>> May I lobby for inclusion of this in 2.3.0? I know work is going on at a furious pace on more important things right now, but when someone needs a break from the intense stuff could this be looked at?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Proposal_Metadata_Options <https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Proposal_Metadata_Options> <https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Proposal_Metadata_Options <https://wiki.audacityteam.org/wiki/Proposal_Metadata_Options>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cliff
>>>>> 
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! http://sdm.link/slashdot <http://sdm.link/slashdot>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Audacity-quality mailing list
>>>>> Aud...@li... <mailto:Aud...@li...>
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-quality
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! http://sdm.link/slashdot <http://sdm.link/slashdot>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Audacity-quality mailing list
>>> Aud...@li... <mailto:Aud...@li...>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-quality <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-quality>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org <http://slashdot.org/>! http://sdm.link/slashdot <http://sdm.link/slashdot>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Audacity-quality mailing list
>> Aud...@li... <mailto:Aud...@li...>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-quality <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-quality>