Re: [Audacity-quality] other command/title isses for effects
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2013-06-26 11:57:56
|
| From Steve the Fiddle <ste...@gm...> | Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:29:00 +0100 | Subject: [Audacity-quality] other command/title isses for effects > On 26 June 2013 10:22, Gale Andrews <ga...@au...> wrote: > > > > | From Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> > > | Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:27:09 -0700 > > | Subject: [Audacity-quality] other command/title isses for effects > >> On 6/25/2013 5:20 PM, Gale Andrews wrote: > >> > > >> > | From Steve the Fiddle <ste...@gm...> > >> > | Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:22:55 +0100 > >> > | Subject: [Audacity-quality] other command/title isses for effects > >> >> On 25 June 2013 14:50, Gale Andrews <ga...@au...> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> | From Steve the Fiddle <ste...@gm...> > >> >>> | Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:46:08 +0100 > >> >>> | Subject: [Audacity-quality] other command/title isses for effects > >> >>>> On 24 June 2013 23:53, Gale Andrews <ga...@au...> wrote: > > [...] > > [snip] > > > Yes I realised that - I think I have seen "Bypass" checkboxes > > for Dry Preview in some effects but perhaps some were > > real-time. > > > > I was just trying to think of the best way to offer the three > > Preview choices in Reverb that we seem to want: > > > > * Standard (mix) > > * Dry only > > * Wet only > > > > without the "confusion" I pointed out. But I see now that > > "Wet Only" affects processing the effect too, so I'm quite > > happy now apart from the "confusion". > I think that by considering alternative control elements you have > confused two different things. [...] > > "Dry Preview" should not be a check box, it is a button. Thanks for the explications. Yes, I'm happy with "Dry Preview" as a button, once I realised the "Wet Only" was not solely preview. I've barely played with Reverb yet, but want to get on with it so I can "resolve-fix" it. I think others may trip over the apparent conflict between "Wet Only" and "Dry Preview", but if the Manual makes it a bit clearer what Wet Only does and adds a description of Dry Preview (I've added a P1 for that) I think it's OK. I'll drop my "suggestion" of greying out "Dry Preview" when "Wet Only" is checked. Gale |