[Audacity-devel] libsoxr VS libsamplerate bug
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Benjamin D. <bd...@de...> - 2013-01-19 00:08:09
|
Hi, I created a test package from the rc1 tarball and called configure with --without-libresample --with-libsamplerate=system --with-libsoxr=yes. configure told me: configure: Using SYSTEM libraries for LIBSOXR configure: disabling LIBRESAMPLE at your request configure: Using the SYSTEM libraries for LIBSAMPLERATE because you specifically requested this [...] configure: Both libsoxr and libsamplerate were requested: favouring libsoxr [...] Finished configure: [...] LIBSOXR: disabled LIBRESAMPLE: disabled LIBSAMPLERATE: using SYSTEM libraries So configure lied about favouring libsoxr, because the resulting binary was only linked against libsamplerate. There was a discussion about const-rare and var-rate sampling. Can libsoxr do both and can fully replace libsamplerate? Another question: Which resample library do you recommend distro-packager to use and why? -- Benjamin Drung Debian & Ubuntu Developer |