Re: [Audacity-quality] Fwd: Re: [Audacity-devel] Fw: SoX resampling

[Gale A. <ga...@au...>]

| From Steve the Fiddle <ste...@gm...> 
| Mon, 5 Nov 2012 08:37:53 +0000
| Subject: [Audacity-quality] Fwd: Re: [Audacity-devel] Fw: SoX resampling
> On 5 November 2012 07:02, Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...> wrote:
> > Is there a bugzilla entry for this?
> 
> 
> I don't believe there is a bug report. I don't think anyone knew if it
> was a bug or just a "limitation" of the effect.
> The problem has been around since at least 2008.
> 
> Steve

No bug entry, though I made some notes about it. 

Rob sees it as a bug, I thought others felt it was a "limitation", so 
at best, an "enhancement" issue or a "review" to see if it can be 
improved.  

Can extreme time warping like that ever be done completely 
smoothly?



Gale     


> >> From: Vaughan Johnson <va...@au...>
> >>>  With this patch on top of r12032, I can confirm that on linux, const-rate
> >>> is working and the two var-rate resamplers can be selected and are working
> >>> (time-track bug notwithstanding).
> >> What time-track bug is that? The crash when using libsamplerate?
> >
> >
> > Ah, there are two bugs; I was referring to the other one: the disjointed
> > spectrogram (and sound), e.g. here, with libresample:
> > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8835547/snapshot6.png
> >
> > (which should be a smooth slide of pitch down, then back up).
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rob