Re: [Audacity-quality] Removal of CleanSpeech from our code
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Martyn S. <mar...@gm...> - 2012-04-17 23:14:40
|
On 16/04/2012 18:50, Gale Andrews wrote: > > | From Steve the Fiddle<ste...@gm...> > | Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:21:43 +0100 > | Subject: [Audacity-quality] Removal of CleanSpeech from our code >> On 15 April 2012 23:43, Martyn Shaw<mar...@gm...> wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >>> I'm working on a patch to eliminate CleanSpeech from our code and need >>> some advice. >>> >>> Are people attached to the 'MP3 Conversion' default item in the >>> 'Chains' list? Shall I leave it in or out? >>> >>> If not, shall I leave in the mechanism to have 'default' items >>> restored in the future? >>> >>> For coders, that's BatchCommands::RestoreChain >>> >>> TTFN >>> Martyn >> >> Am I right in thinking that the "CleanSpeech Chain" command has little >> to do with "CleanSpeech Mode"? Indeed. >> I think that it's definitely worth keeping a couple of example Chain >> presets as they serve to illustrate usage by example. I don't >> necessarily think that we need to keep that one (CleanSpeech) in >> particular, but until someone suggests a better alternative then I >> think we should keep it. Well, let's just keep MP3Conversion for now, it would be 'quite' easy to add a few others in with the current (flawed, see below) system, but I think we all agree that the CS one is not great. > +1 to keeping a couple of restorable chain examples. Personally > I would appreciate being able to delete them, but have a > "Defaults" button to restore them (as per Save / Manage Curves > in EQ). Now that is a good idea for Batch, and could sort out the mess of code involving IsFixed, MP3Conversion, SetWavToMp3Chain and so on. But more work than I was anticipating at this time. I'm glad that the EQ system is working for you. It was originally intended to allow people to share EQ curves, but I don't think that idea took off. Still, the system (I think, but I would) has a good basis of ideas and code behind it. TTFN Martyn > +1 to renaming the "CleanSpeech" chain to something else > and reviewing the commands in it. Perhaps it could be called > "Mastering" (and 128 kbps MP3 is hardly a "high quality master", > so maybe that should be WAV). > > > > Gale > > >> Perhaps if Nyquist plug-in support in Chains is ever introduced then >> that could be a good time to introduce some new Chain examples to >> replace the CleanSpeech example. >> >> Steve > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. > Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. > Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2 > _______________________________________________ > Audacity-quality mailing list > Aud...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-quality |