Re: [Audacity-devel] MixerBoard layout changes
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Vaughan J. <vau...@sb...> - 2009-08-04 18:18:06
|
Gale Andrews wrote: > | From Steve <ste...@gm...> > | Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:15:20 +0100 > | Subject: [Audacity-devel] MixerBoard layout changes > >> Now that there is a bit more room, how about numbers on the slider >> scale? I have attached a mock-up which also shows a pop-up to indicate >> the set level (is that possible?). >> >> I've shown the scale as non-linear which is more like what you will find >> on a hardware mixer. >> > > I think we're hoping Leland has slider tooltips in hand in due course > (Checklist P4 "Toolbar and track gain/pan sliders should display > current slider position on hover"). So I assume this would also fix > the Mixer Bar sliders? > Are you saying that because of that planned enhancement you think there should not be numbers on the slider? --- > I think Martyn's idea of having the slider underneath the meters is > quite interesting, I don't think I saw that. Can you point me to it? I think the slider really needs to be vertical to be at all reminiscent of a hardware mixer board, so I don't see how that would work, if they're vertical on top of vertical. --- > maybe we're overestimating the need for resolution > in the meters? Will that give us enough resolution on the gain slider > though, especially if we go from -36 to +36, or even lower negative > values? Would it be practical (or confusing) to have a shorter scale > for the +ve section, so it needs less space to get to + 36? > > I do tend to think the values on the Track Panel and Mixer Board > gain sliders should be the same. None of the workarounds for > different values seem attractive. I'm not sure about having a log > scale on the Track Panel. I think that could be less intuitive for less > experienced users, and maybe less useful if you only have a single > track? I guess the Track Panel scale could switch to log when the > MixerBoard is open (but again impractical or confusing?). > Very confusing. Like having your car speedometer change scale when you're in a different part of town. --- > Vaughan, I'm not finding myself very happy with my own idea of > having a separate window for Mixer Board, because it obviously > disappears as soon as you click in the main window. Or are users > of Mixer Board going to prefer that? > I don't think so, I put it in only because of your request. I'm sure finding it annoying. Again, it was a separate window and is still a separate window. The change was to remove "float on parent". --- > If we went back to the original window idea, is there a way we could > roll up the Mixer Board, which gives people another way to get it out > of the way when they want to look at the waveforms or use the menus? > If it's rolled up to the main window Title Bar, neither the width or height > of the Mixer Board would be an issue. > It's a separate window, so rolling it up to the title bar is very nonstandard. I think there are lots of better things to improve about it. There is already a minimize box, the standard way to do what you're addressing. Let's not spend a lot of time speculating about what users might want, and get some actual feedback on it. - Vaughan > > > >> On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 19:39 -0700, Vaughan Johnson wrote: >> >>> I made a first effort at rearranging the MixerBoard strips, such that >>> gain slider and meter are not visually related by being the same height. >>> Widened the strip and moved the mute/solo buttons below the meter. >>> Comments on the attached image, please. I can still add notations for >>> the tick marks on the slider, too. >>> >>> Thanks, Vaughan >>> > > > > > |