Re: [Audacity-devel] ANSI builds
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Gale A. <ga...@au...> - 2009-07-15 21:58:47
|
If it helps or not already known, this thread has some information: http://www.msfn.org/board/Visual-Studio-2008-and-Windows-9x-t112283.html and a possible solution (requires statically linked runtime libraries): http://www.legacyextender.com/ Gale | From Gale Andrews <ga...@au...> | Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:20:32 +0100 | Subject: [Audacity-devel] ANSI builds > | From James Crook <cr...@in...> > | Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:27:23 +0100 > | Subject: [Audacity-devel] ANSI builds > > NB: With the move to MSVC 2008 Express, Win 98 builds are no longer > > supported. I am fine with that, especially if no active developer is > > building/testing for Win98. I am wondering though if that makes > > building ANSI builds pointless now? I believe all supported platforms > > support Unicode. > > > > There might possibly be an alternative case for building all-in-one > > builds (wxWidgets linked in). These would be built without wxWidgets > > aware plug-ins and would not be able to use them - because wxWidgets > > needs to be a dll to access it from a plug in. > > > > Mostly your call Gale - do we drop ANSI builds now? > > Having invested quite a bit of time in keeping ANSI going, I would like > to see a 2.0 for 98/ME, but I've no great desire to support ANSI beyond > that. There has to be a cut-off point where we drop support for OS'es > that are no longer supported by their manufacturer, but my rationale is > that it's been so long since a new stable that it would be nice to finish > our support for 98/ME with a non-Beta more fully featured version. > > I'm partly driven by a number of individual users who are constantly > pulling my ear not to drop Win98 support, no doubt conscious that we > may do so. I've no time before release to install Windows 98 on my > second machine, but do you expect any practical problems if you ran > 1.3.8-rc2 on Windows 98, or does anyone already know that there are > problems? > > I would be fine with 98/ME not supporting wxWidgets plug-ins, but > how much work is the changes to accommodate that? > > >From memory, I think the proportion of Windows users still on 98/ME > is about 15%, so it is significant. > > > > Gale |