Re: [Audacity-devel] Documentation updates
A free multi-track audio editor and recorder
Brought to you by:
aosiniao
From: Alexandre P. <ale...@gm...> - 2005-09-22 13:42:14
|
On 9/22/05, Rupert Swarbrick <rup...@li...> wrote: > Docbook can do pdf for you nicely, so a customised pdf output would be fi= ne. There is only one tool for producing nice PDFs in any language without any glitches whatsoever. It's proprietary XEP. All other tools (PassiveTeX, db2latex, FOP) require extra attention. > To clarify, what I mean by customised is that you've got to give docbook > some style info to stop it looking like the standard pages you get at > gnu.org - helpful, but not nice. I'm not entirely sure whether this is > done by CSS afterwards, in which case we would have a problem with the > base HTML version, or by something internally in docbook, which would be > good news. You can merge CSS directly into HTML code by output or keep it separately. Alexandre |