Re: [Audacity-devel] Cygwin and PortMixer

[Dominic M. <do...@mi...>]

Dave,

OK, that's now fixed.  Do a cvs update of AudioIO.cpp and AudioIO.h
and Audacity should now compile without PortMixer.

- Dominic

Dave Fancella wrote:
> All,
> 
> In the continuing work to build audacity on Cygwin...
> 
> First, the problems solved so far.
> 
> Building PortAudio:  While it doesn't appear that Audacity on linux uses 
> the ./configure cycle of portaudio, I found by using the portaudio v18 
> patches daily snapshot from the portaudio website, I could use the 
> ./configure cycle to build portaudio in cygwin.  Not sure this is the 
> best way to go, but it is working--so far.  To make this happen, I 
> replaced portaudio in the lib-src directory with the portaudio patches, 
> renamed the file Makefile.cygwin in the pa_win_wmme directory to 
> Makefile, and added some stuff to Audacity's configure.in file to use it.
> 
> AudacityApp's use of wxRegKey:  Got an ambiguous overload error on line 
> 336 of AudacityApp.cpp, this line:
> tmpRegAudPath = wxString(associateFileTypes).Lower();
> Not sure why this error is there, since wxWindows is supposed to support 
> cygwin completely, so I would think it would support the wxRegKey class 
> however it's supported.  To solve this problem I added to my part of 
> configure.in an AC_DEFINE for __CYGWIN__ and just added !defined 
> (__CYGWIN__) to the #ifdef surrounding this part of audacityapp.cpp
> 
> AudioIO.cpp: this is where it's stuck.  It's stuck on portmixer.  I 
> configured --without-portmixer.  Then, to get make to find configwin.h I 
> took the easy way out and just copied it into the src directory, right 
> next to configunix.h.  Then I changed configwin.h, where it says #define 
> PORTMIXER 1, to #define PORTMIXER 0.  I tried #undef'ing USE_PORTMIXER 
> and it didn't work either.  :(.  I recall portmixer is recently added, 
> in fact some googling turned up Dominic's post on the PortAudio list 
> explaining what portmixer is all about.  :)  Any suggestions?  Does 
> audacity compile without portmixer on other platforms still, or is it no 
> longer considered an option?
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Audacity-devel mailing list
> Aud...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/audacity-devel