Menu
▾
▴
astlinux-users — AstLinux Users Mailing List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(111) |
Mar
(226) |
Apr
(65) |
May
(197) |
Jun
(202) |
Jul
(92) |
Aug
(87) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(89) |
Dec
(155) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(251) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(174) |
Apr
(149) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(171) |
Sep
(245) |
Oct
(244) |
Nov
(218) |
Dec
(272) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(119) |
Mar
(192) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(109) |
Oct
(70) |
Nov
(145) |
Dec
(110) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(137) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(45) |
Apr
(157) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(99) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(136) |
Sep
(101) |
Oct
(100) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(84) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(69) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(151) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(84) |
Dec
(101) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(119) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(115) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(131) |
Jul
(70) |
Aug
(65) |
Sep
(66) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(197) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(68) |
May
(98) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(76) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(38) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(82) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(51) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(69) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(19) |
May
|
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(17) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-23 11:26:49
|
Gosh having lots of issues with the new release. Can anyone think of anything other than the following that would cause directmedia=yes to not work: 1. Compatible codecs 2. Dial Options e.g. T,t ,L etc 3. Video 4. DTMF Regards Michael Knill |
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2017-07-22 16:16:34
|
> Am 22.07.2017 um 16:25 schrieb Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...>: > > Greetings, > > Given the recent pre-release, I want to follow-up discussing the addition of ACME (Let's Encrypt) certificates. > > I must say, when Let's Encrypt was first announced in 2015 I was skeptical how useful this would be with AstLinux, and frankly it initially wasn't too practical since a HTTP query was the only challenge validation method. For AstLinux, public HTTP/HTTPS access is not the default and discouraged, and for some installations AstLinux may be behind another router. > > In 2016 Let's Encrypt added ACME DNS challenge support, which was a game-changer for AstLinux. Rather than proving you own a domain by creating a random HTTP public reachable file, you can use a DNS provider that supports DNS records to be created and removed, often via an API. Your AstLinux box does not even need to be publicly reachable inbound, as long as you can prove you control the DNS for a domain, you can issue and renew a globally valid certificate for an internal host, for a specific domain you own. > > While AstLinux may be the edge device with a public facing interface, typically few (if any) services are exposed to the public side. So what is the value of a globally valid certificate over a self-signed certificate ? > > HTTPS) > Web browsers are getting less and less tolerant of accessing sites with self-signed certificates. For HTTPS phone provisioning, some IP Phones (ex. Yealink) default to validating certificates. Also useful with the stunnel HTTPS proxy. > > SIP-TLS) > Mobile SIP clients are much easier to setup with certificate validation enabled with a globally valid certificate. > (BTW, iOS Bria still has an issue here with validation enabled for SIP-TLS, though XMPP validation works fine) > > XMPP) > XMPP clients are much easier to setup with a globally valid certificate, and in some case required along with SRV records for the domain. > > LDAP) > Many LDAP clients are configurable with the choice of no encryption sending LDAP queries and responses in the clear, or securely with LDAP over SSL which often requires a globally valid certificate. > > Keep in mind that even if client access is over a VPN, globally valid certificates can be very useful and convenient. > > All of you reading this, at some point in time, will want to create a Let's Encrypt certificate for select AstLinux installations. Here is is the basic documentation: > > ACME (Let's Encrypt) Certificates > https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:tt_acme_certificates > > As the documentation suggests, you need both a domain name and a DNS hosting service that is supported by acme.sh (Cloudflare is free for basic features). You must point your domains's name servers to the DNS hosting service's servers. > > The DNS API's 1-29 listed here: https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh/blob/master/dnsapi/README.md are in the recent AstLinux pre-release. > > Now is a good time to understand and test how ACME (Let's Encrypt) Certificates can be used in AstLinux. > > Lonnie > > BTW, a special thanks to David Kerr for testing and creating the "astlinux" deploy script used in acme.sh, wrapped by our acme-client command. David also was able add FreeDNS support upstream to acme.sh. Lonnie and David, thanks a lot for your work. Let's Encrypt (ACME) seems like a very useful addition to AstLinux. I tested it with Cloudflare (as described in the Wiki) and it works fine for me. Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-22 14:25:34
|
Greetings, Given the recent pre-release, I want to follow-up discussing the addition of ACME (Let's Encrypt) certificates. I must say, when Let's Encrypt was first announced in 2015 I was skeptical how useful this would be with AstLinux, and frankly it initially wasn't too practical since a HTTP query was the only challenge validation method. For AstLinux, public HTTP/HTTPS access is not the default and discouraged, and for some installations AstLinux may be behind another router. In 2016 Let's Encrypt added ACME DNS challenge support, which was a game-changer for AstLinux. Rather than proving you own a domain by creating a random HTTP public reachable file, you can use a DNS provider that supports DNS records to be created and removed, often via an API. Your AstLinux box does not even need to be publicly reachable inbound, as long as you can prove you control the DNS for a domain, you can issue and renew a globally valid certificate for an internal host, for a specific domain you own. While AstLinux may be the edge device with a public facing interface, typically few (if any) services are exposed to the public side. So what is the value of a globally valid certificate over a self-signed certificate ? HTTPS) Web browsers are getting less and less tolerant of accessing sites with self-signed certificates. For HTTPS phone provisioning, some IP Phones (ex. Yealink) default to validating certificates. Also useful with the stunnel HTTPS proxy. SIP-TLS) Mobile SIP clients are much easier to setup with certificate validation enabled with a globally valid certificate. (BTW, iOS Bria still has an issue here with validation enabled for SIP-TLS, though XMPP validation works fine) XMPP) XMPP clients are much easier to setup with a globally valid certificate, and in some case required along with SRV records for the domain. LDAP) Many LDAP clients are configurable with the choice of no encryption sending LDAP queries and responses in the clear, or securely with LDAP over SSL which often requires a globally valid certificate. Keep in mind that even if client access is over a VPN, globally valid certificates can be very useful and convenient. All of you reading this, at some point in time, will want to create a Let's Encrypt certificate for select AstLinux installations. Here is is the basic documentation: ACME (Let's Encrypt) Certificates https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:tt_acme_certificates As the documentation suggests, you need both a domain name and a DNS hosting service that is supported by acme.sh (Cloudflare is free for basic features). You must point your domains's name servers to the DNS hosting service's servers. The DNS API's 1-29 listed here: https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh/blob/master/dnsapi/README.md are in the recent AstLinux pre-release. Now is a good time to understand and test how ACME (Let's Encrypt) Certificates can be used in AstLinux. Lonnie BTW, a special thanks to David Kerr for testing and creating the "astlinux" deploy script used in acme.sh, wrapped by our acme-client command. David also was able add FreeDNS support upstream to acme.sh. |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-22 01:47:51
|
Announcing Pre-Release Version: astlinux-1.0-8453 Significant update with Linux 3.16 kernel, will eventually become the new AstLinux 1.3 series. The AstLinux Team is regularly upgrading packages containing security and bug fixes as well as adding new features of our own. -- acme-client, new command to generate Let's Encrypt certificates using the ACME protocol. http://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:tt_acme_certificates -- genx86_64-vm board type http://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:guest_vm_vmware_vsphere 1) Add support for VMware Tools (open-vm-tools 10.1.5) 2) Add support for virtio-scsi as a bootable disk driver, also added to RUNNIX 3) Add support for vmw_pvscsi as a bootable disk driver, also added to RUNNIX Note: If you want to test with the "astlinux-1.0-8453-genx86_64-vm.iso" email me privately. -- DAHDI version bump to 2.10.2 -- DHCPv6 with Prefix Delegation http://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:tt-dhcpv6-prefix-delegation Note: If you previously enabled DHCPv6 in the Network tab -> Connection Type, see IPv6 Autoconfig: "Assign GUA Prefix" reference. -- IPv6 ULA / NPTv6 Configuration http://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:tt_ipv6_ula_nptv6_config -- Traffic Shaper how uses fq_codel (Fair Queueing CoDel) for both 'htb' and 'hfsc' types. Give 'hfsc' a try. -- The default serial baud rate is now 115200 instead of the previous 19200. Upgrading RUNNIX will default to 115200. These pre-release images are for those who would like to take advantage of the AstLinux development before the next official release, as well as providing testing for the project. The "AstLinux Pre-Release ChangeLog" and "Repository URL" entries can be found under the "Development" tab of the AstLinux Project web site ... AstLinux Project -> Development http://www.astlinux-project.org/dev.html While these images are considered 'stable', the lack of testing will not make these images suitable for critical production systems. If you should come across an issue, please report back here. AstLinux Team |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-21 03:43:24
|
Hmm so it obviously works in Astlinux! I use chan_sip Why are your counts so low. Stuffed if I know what is doing it! Yes I have pulled out all cel, pjsip, hep and ari modules and also the ones you have below. Still working on it ( Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 5:55 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > Am 20.07.2017 um 08:13 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: > > core show taskprocessors > > Processor Processed In Queue Max Depth Low water High water > subm:ast_channel_topic_all-00000039 5188 0 631 450 500 > subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000034 8091 0 1031 450 500 > subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000036 8090 0 1031 450 500 > > Why so many? > > Regards > Michael Knill Michael, are you using PJSIP or chan_sip on the Asterisk 13 box? I run Asterisk 13 for about a year successfully on my office PBX with chan_sip. Here is a list of a few modules that I don't load in Asterisk 13: ----- noload => res_mwi_external.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_mwi_external_ami.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_ari_mailboxes.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_pjsip*.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => func_pjsip*.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_pjsip_phoneprov_provider.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_pktccops.so noload => cel_custom.so ----- Maybe that changes something. Otherwise we could compare some configs … For comparison: ----- core show taskprocessors Processor Processed In Queue Max Depth Low water High water ... ... subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007d 6440 0 15 450 500 subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000076 9520 0 25 450 500 subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000078 9519 0 25 450 500 ... ... 135 taskprocessors ----- > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 3:52 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Nope removing all those modules didn't fix it. Sigh! > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 2:50 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > No I don't want to stay with 11 as its basically EoS and I want to move forward with the next LTS release. > We are going to have a big push in the near future to get new systems in and I don't want to be going through this headache with more systems ( > > Yes it could be something to do with my configuration. Hmm slow AMI handler. That's a thought! > From the URL you posted, I also decided I would remove ARI modules as well. I don't see me using it in the near future as I can do everything via AMI. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 1:12 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Michael, > > Is rolling back to Asterisk 11 a possibility for you, or are you using some of the new 13 features ? > > If you are the only person reporting this task processor warning in AstLinux, it may be a configuration issue, slow AMI handler, etc. unique to your setup. > > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2016-June/075616.html > > Lonnie > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:33 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> No nothing I could find that actually helped. I really cant see that it is a resource issue. >> I have posted a message on the forum but Im not hopeful ( >> >> In a bit of a pickle as I have a major customer waiting for this release. >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:36 am >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Michael, >> >> Is there any pattern to get the warnings, like low RAM or low-end CPU ? >> >> Try googling "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again" , there are a lot of results related to this. >> >> Lonnie >> >> >> On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: >> >>> Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. >>> Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? >>> I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael Knill >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> >>> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am >>> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >>> >>> Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. >>> I will let you know how I go. >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael Knill >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> >>> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm >>> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >>> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) >>> >>> Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... >>> >>> Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings >>> http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ >>> >>> Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? >>> >>> Lonnie >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: >>>> >>>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>>> Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>>> >>>> Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Michael Knill Michael http://www.mksolutions.info ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2017-07-20 07:54:29
|
> Am 20.07.2017 um 08:13 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: > > core show taskprocessors > > Processor Processed In Queue Max Depth Low water High water > subm:ast_channel_topic_all-00000039 5188 0 631 450 500 > subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000034 8091 0 1031 450 500 > subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000036 8090 0 1031 450 500 > > Why so many? > > Regards > Michael Knill Michael, are you using PJSIP or chan_sip on the Asterisk 13 box? I run Asterisk 13 for about a year successfully on my office PBX with chan_sip. Here is a list of a few modules that I don't load in Asterisk 13: ----- noload => res_mwi_external.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_mwi_external_ami.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_ari_mailboxes.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_pjsip*.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => func_pjsip*.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_pjsip_phoneprov_provider.so ; Asterisk 13 noload => res_pktccops.so noload => cel_custom.so ----- Maybe that changes something. Otherwise we could compare some configs … For comparison: ----- core show taskprocessors Processor Processed In Queue Max Depth Low water High water ... ... subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007d 6440 0 15 450 500 subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000076 9520 0 25 450 500 subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000078 9519 0 25 450 500 ... ... 135 taskprocessors ----- > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 3:52 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Nope removing all those modules didn't fix it. Sigh! > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 2:50 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > No I don't want to stay with 11 as its basically EoS and I want to move forward with the next LTS release. > We are going to have a big push in the near future to get new systems in and I don't want to be going through this headache with more systems ( > > Yes it could be something to do with my configuration. Hmm slow AMI handler. That's a thought! > From the URL you posted, I also decided I would remove ARI modules as well. I don't see me using it in the near future as I can do everything via AMI. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 1:12 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Michael, > > Is rolling back to Asterisk 11 a possibility for you, or are you using some of the new 13 features ? > > If you are the only person reporting this task processor warning in AstLinux, it may be a configuration issue, slow AMI handler, etc. unique to your setup. > > http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2016-June/075616.html > > Lonnie > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:33 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> No nothing I could find that actually helped. I really cant see that it is a resource issue. >> I have posted a message on the forum but Im not hopeful ( >> >> In a bit of a pickle as I have a major customer waiting for this release. >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:36 am >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Michael, >> >> Is there any pattern to get the warnings, like low RAM or low-end CPU ? >> >> Try googling "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again" , there are a lot of results related to this. >> >> Lonnie >> >> >> On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: >> >>> Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. >>> Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? >>> I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael Knill >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> >>> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am >>> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >>> >>> Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. >>> I will let you know how I go. >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael Knill >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> >>> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm >>> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >>> >>> Hi Michael, >>> >>> Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) >>> >>> Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... >>> >>> Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings >>> http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ >>> >>> Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? >>> >>> Lonnie >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all >>>> >>>> Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: >>>> >>>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>>> Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>>> >>>> Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Michael Knill Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-20 06:13:15
|
core show taskprocessors Processor Processed In Queue Max Depth Low water High water subm:ast_channel_topic_all-00000039 5188 0 631 450 500 subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000034 8091 0 1031 450 500 subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000036 8090 0 1031 450 500 Why so many? Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 3:52 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 Nope removing all those modules didn't fix it. Sigh! Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 2:50 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 No I don't want to stay with 11 as its basically EoS and I want to move forward with the next LTS release. We are going to have a big push in the near future to get new systems in and I don't want to be going through this headache with more systems ( Yes it could be something to do with my configuration. Hmm slow AMI handler. That's a thought! From the URL you posted, I also decided I would remove ARI modules as well. I don't see me using it in the near future as I can do everything via AMI. Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 1:12 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 Michael, Is rolling back to Asterisk 11 a possibility for you, or are you using some of the new 13 features ? If you are the only person reporting this task processor warning in AstLinux, it may be a configuration issue, slow AMI handler, etc. unique to your setup. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2016-June/075616.html Lonnie On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:33 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > No nothing I could find that actually helped. I really cant see that it is a resource issue. > I have posted a message on the forum but Im not hopeful ( > > In a bit of a pickle as I have a major customer waiting for this release. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:36 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Michael, > > Is there any pattern to get the warnings, like low RAM or low-end CPU ? > > Try googling "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again" , there are a lot of results related to this. > > Lonnie > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. >> Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? >> I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. >> I will let you know how I go. >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) >> >> Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... >> >> Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings >> http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ >> >> Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? >> >> Lonnie >> >> >> >> On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: >>> >>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> >>> Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael Knill >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-20 05:51:07
|
Nope removing all those modules didn't fix it. Sigh! Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 2:50 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 No I don't want to stay with 11 as its basically EoS and I want to move forward with the next LTS release. We are going to have a big push in the near future to get new systems in and I don't want to be going through this headache with more systems ( Yes it could be something to do with my configuration. Hmm slow AMI handler. That's a thought! From the URL you posted, I also decided I would remove ARI modules as well. I don't see me using it in the near future as I can do everything via AMI. Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 1:12 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 Michael, Is rolling back to Asterisk 11 a possibility for you, or are you using some of the new 13 features ? If you are the only person reporting this task processor warning in AstLinux, it may be a configuration issue, slow AMI handler, etc. unique to your setup. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2016-June/075616.html Lonnie On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:33 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > No nothing I could find that actually helped. I really cant see that it is a resource issue. > I have posted a message on the forum but Im not hopeful ( > > In a bit of a pickle as I have a major customer waiting for this release. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:36 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Michael, > > Is there any pattern to get the warnings, like low RAM or low-end CPU ? > > Try googling "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again" , there are a lot of results related to this. > > Lonnie > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. >> Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? >> I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. >> I will let you know how I go. >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) >> >> Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... >> >> Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings >> http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ >> >> Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? >> >> Lonnie >> >> >> >> On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: >>> >>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> >>> Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael Knill >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-20 04:49:09
|
No I don't want to stay with 11 as its basically EoS and I want to move forward with the next LTS release. We are going to have a big push in the near future to get new systems in and I don't want to be going through this headache with more systems ( Yes it could be something to do with my configuration. Hmm slow AMI handler. That's a thought! From the URL you posted, I also decided I would remove ARI modules as well. I don't see me using it in the near future as I can do everything via AMI. Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 1:12 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 Michael, Is rolling back to Asterisk 11 a possibility for you, or are you using some of the new 13 features ? If you are the only person reporting this task processor warning in AstLinux, it may be a configuration issue, slow AMI handler, etc. unique to your setup. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2016-June/075616.html Lonnie On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:33 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > No nothing I could find that actually helped. I really cant see that it is a resource issue. > I have posted a message on the forum but Im not hopeful ( > > In a bit of a pickle as I have a major customer waiting for this release. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:36 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Michael, > > Is there any pattern to get the warnings, like low RAM or low-end CPU ? > > Try googling "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again" , there are a lot of results related to this. > > Lonnie > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. >> Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? >> I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. >> I will let you know how I go. >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) >> >> Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... >> >> Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings >> http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ >> >> Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? >> >> Lonnie >> >> >> >> On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: >>> >>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> >>> Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael Knill >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-20 03:11:24
|
Michael, Is rolling back to Asterisk 11 a possibility for you, or are you using some of the new 13 features ? If you are the only person reporting this task processor warning in AstLinux, it may be a configuration issue, slow AMI handler, etc. unique to your setup. http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2016-June/075616.html Lonnie On Jul 19, 2017, at 9:33 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > No nothing I could find that actually helped. I really cant see that it is a resource issue. > I have posted a message on the forum but Im not hopeful ( > > In a bit of a pickle as I have a major customer waiting for this release. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:36 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Michael, > > Is there any pattern to get the warnings, like low RAM or low-end CPU ? > > Try googling "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again" , there are a lot of results related to this. > > Lonnie > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. >> Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? >> I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. >> I will let you know how I go. >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) >> >> Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... >> >> Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings >> http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ >> >> Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? >> >> Lonnie >> >> >> >> On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: >> >>> Hi all >>> >>> Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: >>> >>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >>> >>> Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael Knill >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-20 02:34:07
|
No nothing I could find that actually helped. I really cant see that it is a resource issue. I have posted a message on the forum but Im not hopeful ( In a bit of a pickle as I have a major customer waiting for this release. Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:36 am To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 Michael, Is there any pattern to get the warnings, like low RAM or low-end CPU ? Try googling "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again" , there are a lot of results related to this. Lonnie BTW, Our Netflix viewing plans for this evening is the Australian TV masterpiece "Rake" :-) Netflix just added Season 4 in the US. On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. > Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? > I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. > I will let you know how I go. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Hi Michael, > > Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) > > Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... > > Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings > http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ > > Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? > > Lonnie > > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: >> >> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >> Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >> >> Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-20 01:36:03
|
Thanks Lonnie. I will let you know how I go. Never seen it actually! Australian TV Masterpiece’s are few are far between in my opinion. It has a few prominent Australian actors though! The Castle. Now there is a masterpiece! Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 10:36 am To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 Michael, Is there any pattern to get the warnings, like low RAM or low-end CPU ? Try googling "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again" , there are a lot of results related to this. Lonnie BTW, Our Netflix viewing plans for this evening is the Australian TV masterpiece "Rake" :-) Netflix just added Season 4 in the US. On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. > Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? > I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. > I will let you know how I go. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Hi Michael, > > Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) > > Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... > > Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings > http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ > > Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? > > Lonnie > > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: >> >> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >> Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >> >> Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-20 00:35:32
|
Michael, Is there any pattern to get the warnings, like low RAM or low-end CPU ? Try googling "task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again" , there are a lot of results related to this. Lonnie BTW, Our Netflix viewing plans for this evening is the Australian TV masterpiece "Rake" :-) Netflix just added Season 4 in the US. On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. > Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? > I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. > I will let you know how I go. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 > > Hi Michael, > > Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) > > Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... > > Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings > http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ > > Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? > > Lonnie > > > > On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: >> >> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >> Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >> Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. >> >> Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-20 00:06:55
|
Ah I am getting it on my non VM sites too. I will try with PJSIP, HEP and CEL modules not loaded. Its statsis that is complaining but I actually cant work out whether I need it or not? It's the new message bus architecture but is it in place of the old or just a new one you can use? I use CDR and AMI so I need some form of this messaging architecture! Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Thursday, 20 July 2017 at 8:02 am To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. I will let you know how I go. Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 Hi Michael, Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? Lonnie On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > Hi all > > Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: > > Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. > Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. > Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. > > Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? > > Regards > Michael Knill ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-19 22:01:27
|
Thanks Lonnie. Perfect info. I will let you know how I go. Regards Michael Knill -----Original Message----- From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Wednesday, 19 July 2017 at 10:29 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Getting errors after upgrade to 1.2.10 Asterisk 13 Hi Michael, Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? Lonnie On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > Hi all > > Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: > > Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. > Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. > Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. > > Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? > > Regards > Michael Knill ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-19 12:27:54
|
Hi Michael, Not an issue with Asterisk 11 :-) Here is what Digium says about taskprocessors warnings ... Asterisk Task Processor Queue Size Warnings http://blogs.asterisk.org/2016/07/13/asterisk-task-processor-queue-size-warnings/ Is the VM configured with only one CPU or core ? Lonnie On Jul 19, 2017, at 7:10 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > Hi all > > Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: > > Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. > Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. > Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. > > Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? > > Regards > Michael Knill |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-19 12:11:06
|
Hi all Im not getting these errors on any other sites I have upgraded including a VM site like this one but here they are: Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8574][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-00000079' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. Jul 19 14:22:40 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8576][C-000001aa]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-0000007e' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. Jul 19 14:49:51 3017-Biz_Doctor-CM1 local0.warn asterisk[1107]: WARNING[8787][C-000001b0]: taskprocessor.c:888 in taskprocessor_push: The 'subm:ast_channel_topic_all-cached-0000007b' task processor queue reached 500 scheduled tasks again. Im struggling to find what they mean. Any ideas anyone? Regards Michael Knill |
|
From: Mehdi S. <mah...@ya...> - 2017-07-19 08:57:51
|
Hi >From mailing list and documentation I saw interest about adding sip proxy to astlinux. There is Mid-registrar module in Opensips that without any change in Astlinux can help increase its capacity: " The mid-registrar is a mid-component of a SIP platform, designed to work between end users and the platform’s main registration component. It opens up new possibilities for leveraging existing infrastructure in order to continue to grow (as subscribers and as registration traffic) while keeping an existing low-resources registrar server. Convert incoming high-rate registration traffic into a low-rate variant, towards the main registrar layer. With proper configuration, it can absorb over 90% of existing registration traffic while preserving the back-end’s user location state, effectively reducing resource usage at the respective layer." https://www.opensips.org/Documentation/Tutorials-MidRegistrar Regards M.Shirazi |
|
From: Nate <nat...@gm...> - 2017-07-18 20:38:47
|
Hi Lonnie, many thanks for that. We are definitely on the same page. Feeling similarly after writing you yesterday, I began to setup a vanilla instance of Asterisk for the very purpose of going through the excersise of getting acquainted with the configuration files just as you suggested. :-) So now I have the phones calling eachother and I am working through configuring the outbound/inbound calls. Best regards! Nate On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 12:47 AM, Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo... > wrote: > Hi Nate, > > I found the UniFi VoIP provisioning info ... > > UniFi VoIP - DHCP Option 66 Auto Provisioning Guide(Post 4.7) > https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/213546207-UniFi- > VoIP-DHCP-Option-66-Auto-Provisioning-Guide-Post-4-7- > > Taking a step back, it occurs to me you may want to just play with these > phones and AstLinux and not necessarily auto-provisioning at this point. > > AstLinux requires you to understand how to configure Asterisk via text > .conf files. While this has a learning curve, you have full control of the > resulting PBX, down to the finest detail. > > So many times reported here, "I tried the XYZ GUI, it was nice at first, > but eventually I had to configure raw Asterisk conf files to get it the way > I wanted". > > So, learn Asterisk if you have not already. Start with configuring your > UniFi VoIP phones via their GUI and manually add the matching SIP > credentials in AstLinux's Asterisk. Create a simple dialplan > (extensions.conf) to send and receive calls. This is a good skill to have. > > After you are comfortable with Asterisk, only then you may consider > auto-provisioning the UniFi VoIP phones per the docs above. > > Lonnie > > > On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Nate <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > > Hi Lonnie, thanks for the response. > > > > The phones seem alright. I've only just begun to test them so I don't > have very much experience with them yet. I have been through configuring > them to work with FusionPBX and a couple different SIP providers and the > call quality seemed decent enough; But again I'm not sure how much the > quality reflected the phone or the SIP provider. They are Android based > with a touch screen which makes the interface for configuring them fairly > pleasant. They look/feel nice enough to use FWIW... > > > > Regarding the templates, your comments are most welcome as I had run > diff against some of the files to see if I could get an idea of where they > were similar and different. I'll revisit the yealink.conf to for another > look. > > > > Ubiquiti has a Quick Start Provisioning Guide (PDF) online here with > references to Asterisk and a handful of other PBX's. > > > > Many thanks again. I'm enjoying the introduction to this technology. > > > > Nate > > > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck < > li...@lo...> wrote: > > Hi Nate, > > > > First, how do you like those phones ? > > > > As for the phone provisioning template file, keep in mind that only the > [phoneprov] section is unique to the phone and possibly a few lines in the > [general] section, take a look at templates/yealink.conf . > > > > Do you have any reference how the UniFi UVP phones are provisioned ? > XML via HTTP/HTTPS ? Naming convention for the downloaded XML files ? > > > > Lonnie > > > > > > > > On Jul 17, 2017, at 7:29 PM, Nate <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > > > > Good day everyone, > > > > > > I'm a system admin just getting started with SIP/PBX/VoIP technology. > > > > > > I have the SIP trunk setup and am now just trying to get a couple of > UniFi UVP phones configured to test with. > > > > > > I've read the docs on IP Phone Provisioning Getting Started, and IP > Phone Mass Deployment but neither is clear on what to do if there the > phones you have are not included with the default templates and looking at > the templates it appeared they all had specific settings for their > respective phones. I also didn't see a generic template to use as a > boilerplate either. > > > > > > Can anyone please help clarify what I should do to create a template > for these phones? > > > > > > Many many thanks in advance, > > > > > > Nate. > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > > _______________________________________________ > > Astlinux-users mailing list > > Ast...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot______ > _________________________________________ > > Astlinux-users mailing list > > Ast...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-18 12:47:24
|
Hi Nate, I found the UniFi VoIP provisioning info ... UniFi VoIP - DHCP Option 66 Auto Provisioning Guide(Post 4.7) https://help.ubnt.com/hc/en-us/articles/213546207-UniFi-VoIP-DHCP-Option-66-Auto-Provisioning-Guide-Post-4-7- Taking a step back, it occurs to me you may want to just play with these phones and AstLinux and not necessarily auto-provisioning at this point. AstLinux requires you to understand how to configure Asterisk via text .conf files. While this has a learning curve, you have full control of the resulting PBX, down to the finest detail. So many times reported here, "I tried the XYZ GUI, it was nice at first, but eventually I had to configure raw Asterisk conf files to get it the way I wanted". So, learn Asterisk if you have not already. Start with configuring your UniFi VoIP phones via their GUI and manually add the matching SIP credentials in AstLinux's Asterisk. Create a simple dialplan (extensions.conf) to send and receive calls. This is a good skill to have. After you are comfortable with Asterisk, only then you may consider auto-provisioning the UniFi VoIP phones per the docs above. Lonnie On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:14 PM, Nate <nat...@gm...> wrote: > Hi Lonnie, thanks for the response. > > The phones seem alright. I've only just begun to test them so I don't have very much experience with them yet. I have been through configuring them to work with FusionPBX and a couple different SIP providers and the call quality seemed decent enough; But again I'm not sure how much the quality reflected the phone or the SIP provider. They are Android based with a touch screen which makes the interface for configuring them fairly pleasant. They look/feel nice enough to use FWIW... > > Regarding the templates, your comments are most welcome as I had run diff against some of the files to see if I could get an idea of where they were similar and different. I'll revisit the yealink.conf to for another look. > > Ubiquiti has a Quick Start Provisioning Guide (PDF) online here with references to Asterisk and a handful of other PBX's. > > Many thanks again. I'm enjoying the introduction to this technology. > > Nate > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> wrote: > Hi Nate, > > First, how do you like those phones ? > > As for the phone provisioning template file, keep in mind that only the [phoneprov] section is unique to the phone and possibly a few lines in the [general] section, take a look at templates/yealink.conf . > > Do you have any reference how the UniFi UVP phones are provisioned ? XML via HTTP/HTTPS ? Naming convention for the downloaded XML files ? > > Lonnie > > > > On Jul 17, 2017, at 7:29 PM, Nate <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > > Good day everyone, > > > > I'm a system admin just getting started with SIP/PBX/VoIP technology. > > > > I have the SIP trunk setup and am now just trying to get a couple of UniFi UVP phones configured to test with. > > > > I've read the docs on IP Phone Provisioning Getting Started, and IP Phone Mass Deployment but neither is clear on what to do if there the phones you have are not included with the default templates and looking at the templates it appeared they all had specific settings for their respective phones. I also didn't see a generic template to use as a boilerplate either. > > > > Can anyone please help clarify what I should do to create a template for these phones? > > > > Many many thanks in advance, > > > > Nate. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Nate <nat...@gm...> - 2017-07-18 03:14:51
|
Hi Lonnie, thanks for the response. The phones seem alright. I've only just begun to test them so I don't have very much experience with them yet. I have been through configuring them to work with FusionPBX and a couple different SIP providers and the call quality seemed decent enough; But again I'm not sure how much the quality reflected the phone or the SIP provider. They are Android based with a touch screen which makes the interface for configuring them fairly pleasant. They look/feel nice enough to use FWIW... Regarding the templates, your comments are most welcome as I had run diff against some of the files to see if I could get an idea of where they were similar and different. I'll revisit the yealink.conf to for another look. Ubiquiti has a Quick Start Provisioning Guide (PDF) online here <https://dl.ubnt.com/guides/unifi_voip/UVP_Quick_Provisioning_UG.pdf> with references to Asterisk and a handful of other PBX's. Many thanks again. I'm enjoying the introduction to this technology. Nate On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> wrote: > Hi Nate, > > First, how do you like those phones ? > > As for the phone provisioning template file, keep in mind that only the > [phoneprov] section is unique to the phone and possibly a few lines in the > [general] section, take a look at templates/yealink.conf . > > Do you have any reference how the UniFi UVP phones are provisioned ? XML > via HTTP/HTTPS ? Naming convention for the downloaded XML files ? > > Lonnie > > > > On Jul 17, 2017, at 7:29 PM, Nate <nat...@gm...> wrote: > > > Good day everyone, > > > > I'm a system admin just getting started with SIP/PBX/VoIP technology. > > > > I have the SIP trunk setup and am now just trying to get a couple of > UniFi UVP phones configured to test with. > > > > I've read the docs on IP Phone Provisioning Getting Started, and IP > Phone Mass Deployment but neither is clear on what to do if there the > phones you have are not included with the default templates and looking at > the templates it appeared they all had specific settings for their > respective phones. I also didn't see a generic template to use as a > boilerplate either. > > > > Can anyone please help clarify what I should do to create a template for > these phones? > > > > Many many thanks in advance, > > > > Nate. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-18 02:33:59
|
Hi Nate, First, how do you like those phones ? As for the phone provisioning template file, keep in mind that only the [phoneprov] section is unique to the phone and possibly a few lines in the [general] section, take a look at templates/yealink.conf . Do you have any reference how the UniFi UVP phones are provisioned ? XML via HTTP/HTTPS ? Naming convention for the downloaded XML files ? Lonnie On Jul 17, 2017, at 7:29 PM, Nate <nat...@gm...> wrote: > Good day everyone, > > I'm a system admin just getting started with SIP/PBX/VoIP technology. > > I have the SIP trunk setup and am now just trying to get a couple of UniFi UVP phones configured to test with. > > I've read the docs on IP Phone Provisioning Getting Started, and IP Phone Mass Deployment but neither is clear on what to do if there the phones you have are not included with the default templates and looking at the templates it appeared they all had specific settings for their respective phones. I also didn't see a generic template to use as a boilerplate either. > > Can anyone please help clarify what I should do to create a template for these phones? > > Many many thanks in advance, > > Nate. |
|
From: Nate <nat...@gm...> - 2017-07-18 00:29:16
|
Good day everyone, I'm a system admin just getting started with SIP/PBX/VoIP technology. I have the SIP trunk setup and am now just trying to get a couple of UniFi UVP phones configured to test with. I've read the docs on IP Phone Provisioning Getting Started, and IP Phone Mass Deployment but neither is clear on what to do if there the phones you have are not included with the default templates and looking at the templates it appeared they all had specific settings for their respective phones. I also didn't see a generic template to use as a boilerplate either. Can anyone please help clarify what I should do to create a template for these phones? Many many thanks in advance, Nate. |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-16 20:19:49
|
Hi, Digium has updated their core sounds to version 1.6. Adding the New Zealand en_NZ language core sounds. The web interface System tab has been updated with language [english-nz] in the SVN, but if you want to hear a New Zealand accent now, from the command line: (Show the current installed sounds) CLI> upgrade-asterisk-sounds show (Add the en_NZ core sounds using the ulaw CODEC) CLI> upgrade-asterisk-sounds upgrade core en_NZ ulaw (Show the current installed sounds) CLI> upgrade-asterisk-sounds show Lonnie |
|
From: John N. <jn...@co...> - 2017-07-15 14:28:38
|
One of many nodes I have set up for our private Telephone Collectors Network was just removed from service for an update. An old HP 55XX thin client with AstLinux .5 !!
No spinning platters or fans to wear out
The user never had an issue with the hardware or AstLinux.
Although never high traffic, and not used as a router, it was available 24/7, never an issue with the flash or power supply, and recovery after a power outage was never an issue
It was replaced with an HP 5720, and a late version of AstLinux with Asterisk 11 ( No funny CDR issues ).
John Novack
Michael Keuter wrote:
> Hi Mehdi,
>
> if you choose the right hardware (Jetway, APU2 or a VM - checkout our Wiki) the AstLinux server itself will rarely be the culprit of an outage.
> IMHO in 90% of all cases is either the internet down, there are problems with DNS or other ISP issues or the SIP-trunk provider has issues.
>
> Other cases from experiences would be broken power supplies, CompactFlash cards or mSATAs (very rarely). Some of my customers have a second backup box.
> None of them ever really used them ("in production"), they only tried to use them only to figure out, that the internet/SIP trunk is really down :-).
>
> Michael
>
> http://www.mksolutions.info
>
>> Am 15.07.2017 um 07:14 schrieb Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...>:
>>
>> Hi
>> This is my modified version of two servers poor mans Load balancing & High Availability plan:
>>
>>
>> 1- Servers are Active/Active. Sip phones are registered base on DNS-SRV or they support primary and
>>
>> secondary server.
>>
>> 2-Servers realize sip phone registration states by DUNDi and route the call to correct server.
>> 3-Not saving any Persistence data in internal Asterisk database Astdb and implementing service like
>>
>> DND... in dialplan and saving any service and persistence data in BOTH servers another odbc database at SAME time in dialplan(number of writing for service configuration change is very low vs reading so no performance penalty for writing in both servers databases from one server dialplan )=> no need to database replication.
>> 4-Configuration files, voice files... should be synchronized between two servers by Unison.
>>
>>
>> any opinion and any experience with astlinux and DUNDi(Corosync).
>>
>> Regards
>> M.Shirazi
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...>
>> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...>
>> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>
>> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Thanks for Answers.
>> My compromised design about a VOIP system is this:
>> 1-It is Active/Standby and saving Call states are NOT important and switch over up-til 5
>> minutes is ok (if Active server fails ,sip phones should register again in Standby server)
>>
>>
>> 2-Not saving any Persistence data in internal Asterisk database Astdb and put it in RAMDisk.
>> According to Freeswitch wiki(similar project)it greatly improve performance and prolong SSD life:
>> "On a normal configuration, core.db is written to disk almost every second, generating hundreds of
>>
>> block-writes per second. To avoid this problem, turn /usr/local/freeswitch/db into an in-memory
>>
>> filesystem. If you use SSDs, it is CRITICAL that you move core.db to a RAM disk to prolong the life of
>>
>> the SSD."
>> https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_DB_In_RAMdrive
>> https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Performance_testing_and_configurations#FreeSWITCH.27s_core.db_I.2FO_bottleneck
>> https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/SSD+Tuning+for+Linux
>>
>> 3-Persistance data saved in another Sqlite3 or odbc database.
>> Configuration files, voice files... should be synchronized between Active and standby server
>> bidirectionally(GlusterFs,csync2,unison) also Sqlite3(rqlite?) or odbc database(postgresql bdr , mysql
>>
>> master master).
>>
>> Bidirectionally because I want when master server recovered from a failure it has all changes Slave
>>
>> server done (follow me changes , voice message deletes... ) another reason for bidirectional replication
>>
>> is may be we can put some load on standby server( some queue or some IVRs...with fallback to Active capability)
>>
>> 4-It is possible to use sip phones with capability of setting primary and secondary servers but IP float
>> (Keepalived) is preferred.
>>
>> Regards
>> M.Shirazi
>> ________________________________
>> From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>
>> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...>
>> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 3:11 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Mehdi
>>
>> 1. Im interested in your requirements here. Are you having performance issues with the current setup? Are the DB lookups your bottleneck? Are you using an SSD?
>> 2. Astlinux supports WAN failover only. There are a few articles available regarding solutions for Asterisk HA but it is not an inbuilt Asterisk feature. What are your requirements for HA?
>> 3. It should be fairly simple to build some middleware for this
>>
>> Regards
>> Michael Knill
>>
>> From: AstLinux List <ast...@li...>
>> Reply-To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>, AstLinux List <ast...@li...>
>> Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 3:33 pm
>> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...>
>> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>
>> Subject: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA
>>
>> Hi
>> Thanks for maintaining good project.
>> 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database?
>> 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived)
>> 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ?
>>
>> Regards
>> M.Shirazi
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Astlinux-users mailing list
> Ast...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
>
> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....
>
>
--
Dog is my Co-pilot
|
63 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
