Menu
▾
▴
astlinux-users — AstLinux Users Mailing List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(91) |
Feb
(111) |
Mar
(226) |
Apr
(65) |
May
(197) |
Jun
(202) |
Jul
(92) |
Aug
(87) |
Sep
(120) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(89) |
Dec
(155) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(251) |
Feb
(136) |
Mar
(174) |
Apr
(149) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(171) |
Sep
(245) |
Oct
(244) |
Nov
(218) |
Dec
(272) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(119) |
Mar
(192) |
Apr
(117) |
May
(93) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(54) |
Sep
(109) |
Oct
(70) |
Nov
(145) |
Dec
(110) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(137) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(45) |
Apr
(157) |
May
(58) |
Jun
(99) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(136) |
Sep
(101) |
Oct
(100) |
Nov
(61) |
Dec
(60) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(84) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(69) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(151) |
Oct
(120) |
Nov
(84) |
Dec
(101) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(119) |
Feb
(82) |
Mar
(70) |
Apr
(115) |
May
(66) |
Jun
(131) |
Jul
(70) |
Aug
(65) |
Sep
(66) |
Oct
(86) |
Nov
(197) |
Dec
(81) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(48) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(68) |
May
(98) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(42) |
Oct
(37) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(61) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(28) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(69) |
Nov
(55) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(31) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(15) |
Nov
(24) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(62) |
Feb
(76) |
Mar
(30) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(46) |
Jun
(62) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(67) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(38) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(69) |
Apr
(59) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(40) |
Jul
(76) |
Aug
(82) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(51) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(30) |
| 2018 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(35) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(69) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2019 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(19) |
May
|
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(25) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2020 |
Jan
(22) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(36) |
Apr
(40) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(32) |
Sep
(71) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2021 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(17) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(22) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2022 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(18) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2023 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(25) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2024 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2025 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(13) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2017-07-15 13:56:06
|
Hi Mehdi,
if you choose the right hardware (Jetway, APU2 or a VM - checkout our Wiki) the AstLinux server itself will rarely be the culprit of an outage.
IMHO in 90% of all cases is either the internet down, there are problems with DNS or other ISP issues or the SIP-trunk provider has issues.
Other cases from experiences would be broken power supplies, CompactFlash cards or mSATAs (very rarely). Some of my customers have a second backup box.
None of them ever really used them ("in production"), they only tried to use them only to figure out, that the internet/SIP trunk is really down :-).
Michael
http://www.mksolutions.info
> Am 15.07.2017 um 07:14 schrieb Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...>:
>
> Hi
> This is my modified version of two servers poor mans Load balancing & High Availability plan:
>
>
> 1- Servers are Active/Active. Sip phones are registered base on DNS-SRV or they support primary and
>
> secondary server.
>
> 2-Servers realize sip phone registration states by DUNDi and route the call to correct server.
> 3-Not saving any Persistence data in internal Asterisk database Astdb and implementing service like
>
> DND... in dialplan and saving any service and persistence data in BOTH servers another odbc database at SAME time in dialplan(number of writing for service configuration change is very low vs reading so no performance penalty for writing in both servers databases from one server dialplan )=> no need to database replication.
> 4-Configuration files, voice files... should be synchronized between two servers by Unison.
>
>
> any opinion and any experience with astlinux and DUNDi(Corosync).
>
> Regards
> M.Shirazi
>
> ________________________________
> From: Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...>
> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...>
> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA
>
> Hi
>
> Thanks for Answers.
> My compromised design about a VOIP system is this:
> 1-It is Active/Standby and saving Call states are NOT important and switch over up-til 5
> minutes is ok (if Active server fails ,sip phones should register again in Standby server)
>
>
> 2-Not saving any Persistence data in internal Asterisk database Astdb and put it in RAMDisk.
> According to Freeswitch wiki(similar project)it greatly improve performance and prolong SSD life:
> "On a normal configuration, core.db is written to disk almost every second, generating hundreds of
>
> block-writes per second. To avoid this problem, turn /usr/local/freeswitch/db into an in-memory
>
> filesystem. If you use SSDs, it is CRITICAL that you move core.db to a RAM disk to prolong the life of
>
> the SSD."
> https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_DB_In_RAMdrive
> https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Performance_testing_and_configurations#FreeSWITCH.27s_core.db_I.2FO_bottleneck
> https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/SSD+Tuning+for+Linux
>
> 3-Persistance data saved in another Sqlite3 or odbc database.
> Configuration files, voice files... should be synchronized between Active and standby server
> bidirectionally(GlusterFs,csync2,unison) also Sqlite3(rqlite?) or odbc database(postgresql bdr , mysql
>
> master master).
>
> Bidirectionally because I want when master server recovered from a failure it has all changes Slave
>
> server done (follow me changes , voice message deletes... ) another reason for bidirectional replication
>
> is may be we can put some load on standby server( some queue or some IVRs...with fallback to Active capability)
>
> 4-It is possible to use sip phones with capability of setting primary and secondary servers but IP float
> (Keepalived) is preferred.
>
> Regards
> M.Shirazi
> ________________________________
> From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>
> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...>
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 3:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA
>
>
>
> Hi Mehdi
>
> 1. Im interested in your requirements here. Are you having performance issues with the current setup? Are the DB lookups your bottleneck? Are you using an SSD?
> 2. Astlinux supports WAN failover only. There are a few articles available regarding solutions for Asterisk HA but it is not an inbuilt Asterisk feature. What are your requirements for HA?
> 3. It should be fairly simple to build some middleware for this
>
> Regards
> Michael Knill
>
> From: AstLinux List <ast...@li...>
> Reply-To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>, AstLinux List <ast...@li...>
> Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 3:33 pm
> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...>
> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>
> Subject: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA
>
> Hi
> Thanks for maintaining good project.
> 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database?
> 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived)
> 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ?
>
> Regards
> M.Shirazi
|
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-15 12:49:01
|
Hi Mehdi, > any opinion and any experience with astlinux and DUNDi(Corosync). Sorry, but the AstLinux image does not include the Corosync package. I checked and Corosync is not in the upstream Buildroot of which our build system is based. Lonnie On Jul 15, 2017, at 12:14 AM, Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...> wrote: > Hi > This is my modified version of two servers poor mans Load balancing & High Availability plan: > > > 1- Servers are Active/Active. Sip phones are registered base on DNS-SRV or they support primary and > > secondary server. > > 2-Servers realize sip phone registration states by DUNDi and route the call to correct server. > 3-Not saving any Persistence data in internal Asterisk database Astdb and implementing service like > > DND... in dialplan and saving any service and persistence data in BOTH servers another odbc database at SAME time in dialplan(number of writing for service configuration change is very low vs reading so no performance penalty for writing in both servers databases from one server dialplan )=> no need to database replication. > 4-Configuration files, voice files... should be synchronized between two servers by Unison. > > > any opinion and any experience with astlinux and DUNDi(Corosync). > > Regards > M.Shirazi > > ________________________________ > From: Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...> > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> > Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...> > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:22 PM > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA > > > > Hi > > Thanks for Answers. > My compromised design about a VOIP system is this: > 1-It is Active/Standby and saving Call states are NOT important and switch over up-til 5 > minutes is ok (if Active server fails ,sip phones should register again in Standby server) > > > 2-Not saving any Persistence data in internal Asterisk database Astdb and put it in RAMDisk. > According to Freeswitch wiki(similar project)it greatly improve performance and prolong SSD life: > "On a normal configuration, core.db is written to disk almost every second, generating hundreds of > > block-writes per second. To avoid this problem, turn /usr/local/freeswitch/db into an in-memory > > filesystem. If you use SSDs, it is CRITICAL that you move core.db to a RAM disk to prolong the life of > > the SSD." > https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_DB_In_RAMdrive > https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Performance_testing_and_configurations#FreeSWITCH.27s_core.db_I.2FO_bottleneck > https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/SSD+Tuning+for+Linux > > 3-Persistance data saved in another Sqlite3 or odbc database. > Configuration files, voice files... should be synchronized between Active and standby server > bidirectionally(GlusterFs,csync2,unison) also Sqlite3(rqlite?) or odbc database(postgresql bdr , mysql > > master master). > > Bidirectionally because I want when master server recovered from a failure it has all changes Slave > > server done (follow me changes , voice message deletes... ) another reason for bidirectional replication > > is may be we can put some load on standby server( some queue or some IVRs...with fallback to Active capability) > > 4-It is possible to use sip phones with capability of setting primary and secondary servers but IP float > (Keepalived) is preferred. > > Regards > M.Shirazi > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> > To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 3:11 AM > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA > > > > Hi Mehdi > > 1. Im interested in your requirements here. Are you having performance issues with the current setup? Are the DB lookups your bottleneck? Are you using an SSD? > 2. Astlinux supports WAN failover only. There are a few articles available regarding solutions for Asterisk HA but it is not an inbuilt Asterisk feature. What are your requirements for HA? > 3. It should be fairly simple to build some middleware for this > > Regards > Michael Knill > > From: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Reply-To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>, AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 3:33 pm > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...> > Subject: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA > > Hi > Thanks for maintaining good project. > 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database? > 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived) > 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? > > Regards > M.Shirazi > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > |
|
From: Mehdi S. <mah...@ya...> - 2017-07-15 05:14:50
|
Hi This is my modified version of two servers poor mans Load balancing & High Availability plan: 1- Servers are Active/Active. Sip phones are registered base on DNS-SRV or they support primary and secondary server. 2-Servers realize sip phone registration states by DUNDi and route the call to correct server. 3-Not saving any Persistence data in internal Asterisk database Astdb and implementing service like DND... in dialplan and saving any service and persistence data in BOTH servers another odbc database at SAME time in dialplan(number of writing for service configuration change is very low vs reading so no performance penalty for writing in both servers databases from one server dialplan )=> no need to database replication. 4-Configuration files, voice files... should be synchronized between two servers by Unison. any opinion and any experience with astlinux and DUNDi(Corosync). Regards M.Shirazi ________________________________ From: Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 12:22 PM Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Thanks for Answers. My compromised design about a VOIP system is this: 1-It is Active/Standby and saving Call states are NOT important and switch over up-til 5 minutes is ok (if Active server fails ,sip phones should register again in Standby server) 2-Not saving any Persistence data in internal Asterisk database Astdb and put it in RAMDisk. According to Freeswitch wiki(similar project)it greatly improve performance and prolong SSD life: "On a normal configuration, core.db is written to disk almost every second, generating hundreds of block-writes per second. To avoid this problem, turn /usr/local/freeswitch/db into an in-memory filesystem. If you use SSDs, it is CRITICAL that you move core.db to a RAM disk to prolong the life of the SSD." https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_DB_In_RAMdrive https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Performance_testing_and_configurations#FreeSWITCH.27s_core.db_I.2FO_bottleneck https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/SSD+Tuning+for+Linux 3-Persistance data saved in another Sqlite3 or odbc database. Configuration files, voice files... should be synchronized between Active and standby server bidirectionally(GlusterFs,csync2,unison) also Sqlite3(rqlite?) or odbc database(postgresql bdr , mysql master master). Bidirectionally because I want when master server recovered from a failure it has all changes Slave server done (follow me changes , voice message deletes... ) another reason for bidirectional replication is may be we can put some load on standby server( some queue or some IVRs...with fallback to Active capability) 4-It is possible to use sip phones with capability of setting primary and secondary servers but IP float (Keepalived) is preferred. Regards M.Shirazi ________________________________ From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 3:11 AM Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Mehdi 1. Im interested in your requirements here. Are you having performance issues with the current setup? Are the DB lookups your bottleneck? Are you using an SSD? 2. Astlinux supports WAN failover only. There are a few articles available regarding solutions for Asterisk HA but it is not an inbuilt Asterisk feature. What are your requirements for HA? 3. It should be fairly simple to build some middleware for this Regards Michael Knill From: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Reply-To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>, AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 3:33 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...> Subject: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Thanks for maintaining good project. 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database? 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived) 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? Regards M.Shirazi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: David K. <da...@ke...> - 2017-07-13 13:55:20
|
A few years ago I made a lot of enhancements to the CDR page to facilitate sorting and maybe filtering as well (was a long time ago, I don't remember everything I did). But it was way more feature/function than the AstLinux dev team felt comfortable including at the time... and it used client-side JavaScript as well as server-side php. So while anything is possible I think the current view is that AstLinux should just display the CDR log as Asterisk generated it. David On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Josh Alberts <jm...@ho...> wrote: > David, > > > Good to know, thanks for the info. I think it would be nice if Astlinux > could provide options for which entries you want to include (or exclude) > from the CDR Log screen. Excluding calls with a time of 0 would remove all > the duplicates in my case, I think. However, this isn't a huge issue and I > can learn to live with the multiple entries :) > > Josh > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* David Kerr <da...@ke...> > *Sent:* Monday, July 10, 2017 2:53 PM > *To:* AstLinux Users Mailing List > *Subject:* Re: [Astlinux-users] Multiple CDR Entries in Web Interface > > Welcome to Asterisk 13. They completely re-wrote the CDR engine and now > they log everything, and I mean everything. Lots of debate on this over on > the Asterisk lists at the time but the bottom line is that there is pretty > much nothing you can do about this. I have tried using NoCDR() calls in > the dial plan but nothing gets me to a simple one-entry per call CDR. > > David > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Josh Alberts <jm...@ho...> wrote: > >> I searched the list archives and I didn't see anything about this, but my >> apologies if this has been addressed before. >> >> >> Since upgrading from Asterisk 11 to Asterisk 13, it appears that inbound >> calls that are labeled FAILED and NO ANSWER are now appearing in the web >> CDR log. Previously, they did not. For example, when a call is unanswered >> and is sent to Voicemail, I now see one entry for the NO ANSWER leg of the >> call and another for the Voicemail portion of the call. I'd like to remove >> the NO ANSWER listings from the web but keep them coming into Master.csv. >> Can someone please tell me how I can do this? >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> Josh >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to >> pa...@kr.... >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > |
|
From: Josh A. <jm...@ho...> - 2017-07-13 13:47:23
|
David, Good to know, thanks for the info. I think it would be nice if Astlinux could provide options for which entries you want to include (or exclude) from the CDR Log screen. Excluding calls with a time of 0 would remove all the duplicates in my case, I think. However, this isn't a huge issue and I can learn to live with the multiple entries :) Josh ________________________________ From: David Kerr <da...@ke...> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 2:53 PM To: AstLinux Users Mailing List Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Multiple CDR Entries in Web Interface Welcome to Asterisk 13. They completely re-wrote the CDR engine and now they log everything, and I mean everything. Lots of debate on this over on the Asterisk lists at the time but the bottom line is that there is pretty much nothing you can do about this. I have tried using NoCDR() calls in the dial plan but nothing gets me to a simple one-entry per call CDR. David On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Josh Alberts <jm...@ho...<mailto:jm...@ho...>> wrote: I searched the list archives and I didn't see anything about this, but my apologies if this has been addressed before. Since upgrading from Asterisk 11 to Asterisk 13, it appears that inbound calls that are labeled FAILED and NO ANSWER are now appearing in the web CDR log. Previously, they did not. For example, when a call is unanswered and is sent to Voicemail, I now see one entry for the NO ANSWER leg of the call and another for the Voicemail portion of the call. I'd like to remove the NO ANSWER listings from the web but keep them coming into Master.csv. Can someone please tell me how I can do this? Thanks, Josh ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li...<mailto:Ast...@li...> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr...<mailto:pa...@kr...>. |
|
From: David K. <da...@ke...> - 2017-07-10 18:53:33
|
Welcome to Asterisk 13. They completely re-wrote the CDR engine and now they log everything, and I mean everything. Lots of debate on this over on the Asterisk lists at the time but the bottom line is that there is pretty much nothing you can do about this. I have tried using NoCDR() calls in the dial plan but nothing gets me to a simple one-entry per call CDR. David On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Josh Alberts <jm...@ho...> wrote: > I searched the list archives and I didn't see anything about this, but my > apologies if this has been addressed before. > > > Since upgrading from Asterisk 11 to Asterisk 13, it appears that inbound > calls that are labeled FAILED and NO ANSWER are now appearing in the web > CDR log. Previously, they did not. For example, when a call is unanswered > and is sent to Voicemail, I now see one entry for the NO ANSWER leg of the > call and another for the Voicemail portion of the call. I'd like to remove > the NO ANSWER listings from the web but keep them coming into Master.csv. > Can someone please tell me how I can do this? > > > Thanks, > > > Josh > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > |
|
From: Josh A. <jm...@ho...> - 2017-07-10 18:08:20
|
I searched the list archives and I didn't see anything about this, but my apologies if this has been addressed before. Since upgrading from Asterisk 11 to Asterisk 13, it appears that inbound calls that are labeled FAILED and NO ANSWER are now appearing in the web CDR log. Previously, they did not. For example, when a call is unanswered and is sent to Voicemail, I now see one entry for the NO ANSWER leg of the call and another for the Voicemail portion of the call. I'd like to remove the NO ANSWER listings from the web but keep them coming into Master.csv. Can someone please tell me how I can do this? Thanks, Josh |
|
From: Mehdi S. <mah...@ya...> - 2017-07-10 07:43:33
|
Hi Thanks for Answers. My compromised design about a VOIP system is this: 1-It is Active/Standby and saving Call states are NOT important and switch over up-til 5 minutes is ok (if Active server fails ,sip phones should register again in Standby server) 2-Not saving any Persistence data in internal Asterisk database Astdb and put it in RAMDisk. According to Freeswitch wiki(similar project)it greatly improve performance and prolong SSD life: "On a normal configuration, core.db is written to disk almost every second, generating hundreds of block-writes per second. To avoid this problem, turn /usr/local/freeswitch/db into an in-memory filesystem. If you use SSDs, it is CRITICAL that you move core.db to a RAM disk to prolong the life of the SSD." https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/FreeSWITCH_DB_In_RAMdrive https://wiki.freeswitch.org/wiki/Performance_testing_and_configurations#FreeSWITCH.27s_core.db_I.2FO_bottleneck https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/SSD+Tuning+for+Linux 3-Persistance data saved in another Sqlite3 or odbc database. Configuration files, voice files... should be synchronized between Active and standby server bidirectionally(GlusterFs,csync2,unison) also Sqlite3(rqlite?) or odbc database(postgresql bdr , mysql master master). Bidirectionally because I want when master server recovered from a failure it has all changes Slave server done (follow me changes , voice message deletes... ) another reason for bidirectional replication is may be we can put some load on standby server( some queue or some IVRs...with fallback to Active capability) 4-It is possible to use sip phones with capability of setting primary and secondary servers but IP float (Keepalived) is preferred. Regards M.Shirazi ________________________________ From: Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 3:11 AM Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Mehdi 1. Im interested in your requirements here. Are you having performance issues with the current setup? Are the DB lookups your bottleneck? Are you using an SSD? 2. Astlinux supports WAN failover only. There are a few articles available regarding solutions for Asterisk HA but it is not an inbuilt Asterisk feature. What are your requirements for HA? 3. It should be fairly simple to build some middleware for this Regards Michael Knill From: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Reply-To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>, AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 3:33 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...> Subject: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Thanks for maintaining good project. 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database? 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived) 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? Regards M.Shirazi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Astlinux-users mailing list Ast...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-10 03:06:02
|
Yes agreed! Regards Michael Knill From: Darrick Hartman <dha...@dj...> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Monday, 10 July 2017 at 12:53 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Michael, I think the best HA middleware would be the enterprise license of VMware. With the next major release, AstLinux supports openvmtools which should allow guest fail over to a different VM host if there is a hardware issue with the original host. We had some scripts to do some “duct tape and strings” with manual triggers to do fail over of sorts for a client who wanted that in the past. It was tested, but never used in production. (so it is possible, but may not be practical) Darrick From: Michael Knill [mailto:mic...@ip...] Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 5:40 PM To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Mehdi 1. Im interested in your requirements here. Are you having performance issues with the current setup? Are the DB lookups your bottleneck? Are you using an SSD? 2. Astlinux supports WAN failover only. There are a few articles available regarding solutions for Asterisk HA but it is not an inbuilt Asterisk feature. What are your requirements for HA? 3. It should be fairly simple to build some middleware for this Regards Michael Knill From: AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Reply-To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...<mailto:mah...@ya...>>, AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 3:33 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...<mailto:mah...@ya...>> Subject: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Thanks for maintaining good project. 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database? 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived) 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? Regards M.Shirazi |
|
From: Darrick H. <dha...@dj...> - 2017-07-10 02:53:45
|
Michael, I think the best HA middleware would be the enterprise license of VMware. With the next major release, AstLinux supports openvmtools which should allow guest fail over to a different VM host if there is a hardware issue with the original host. We had some scripts to do some “duct tape and strings” with manual triggers to do fail over of sorts for a client who wanted that in the past. It was tested, but never used in production. (so it is possible, but may not be practical) Darrick From: Michael Knill [mailto:mic...@ip...] Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2017 5:40 PM To: AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Mehdi 1. Im interested in your requirements here. Are you having performance issues with the current setup? Are the DB lookups your bottleneck? Are you using an SSD? 2. Astlinux supports WAN failover only. There are a few articles available regarding solutions for Asterisk HA but it is not an inbuilt Asterisk feature. What are your requirements for HA? 3. It should be fairly simple to build some middleware for this Regards Michael Knill From: AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Reply-To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...<mailto:mah...@ya...>>, AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 3:33 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...<mailto:ast...@li...>> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...<mailto:mah...@ya...>> Subject: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Thanks for maintaining good project. 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database? 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived) 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? Regards M.Shirazi |
|
From: Michael K. <mic...@ip...> - 2017-07-09 22:39:58
|
Hi Mehdi 1. Im interested in your requirements here. Are you having performance issues with the current setup? Are the DB lookups your bottleneck? Are you using an SSD? 2. Astlinux supports WAN failover only. There are a few articles available regarding solutions for Asterisk HA but it is not an inbuilt Asterisk feature. What are your requirements for HA? 3. It should be fairly simple to build some middleware for this Regards Michael Knill From: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Reply-To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>, AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Date: Saturday, 8 July 2017 at 3:33 pm To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> Cc: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...> Subject: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA Hi Thanks for maintaining good project. 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database? 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived) 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? Regards M.Shirazi |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-07-09 18:44:05
|
I don't know the low-level details how Asterisk and SQLite (astdb) writes occur ... are they synchronous or asynchronous ? is the data flushed to disk after a write ? Also, it is possible using ODBC with a SQLite3 backend would have better performance than using Asterisk astdb ... Asterisk ODBC using SQLite3 https://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:tt_asterisk-odbc I seem to recall there were recent changes to Asterisk 13 regarding ODBC performance. I forget the details. Lonnie On Jul 9, 2017, at 10:38 AM, David Kerr <Da...@Ke...> wrote: > I'm still curious as to why astdb needs to be on ramdisk. I also read from astdb several times for every incoming call, but I don't write to it. And Linux does a lot of filesystem cacheing... essentially the linux kernel uses every available byte of ram to cache data and programs so that you are not reading from physical disk (or ssd) every time you read from a file. So until you perform a db write I am assuming that the vast majority of my astdb reads are optimized by the linux filesystem and come from ram not ssd. > > Right? Wrong? > > David > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 12:13 PM, The Cadillac Kid via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...> wrote: > I run my asterisk DB in RAM on my regular asterisk servers.. I have an agent that automatically backs that up every so often to set a of files.. if my asterisk system crashes then it reloads my asterisk DB on boot.. persistence is maintained via storing my asterisk DB as a datadump style file on regular storage and not just copying the astdb file (you'll corrupt it if you do that).. > > its fast.. I use a LOT of astdb lookups in my normal call processing.. > -Christopher > > > From: David Kerr <da...@ke...> > To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>; AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...> > Sent: Saturday, July 8, 2017 12:06 PM > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA > > Astlinux already uses a tmpfs for most files. For those specific files that need to be persistent astlinux uses a soft link to /mnt/kd which is persistent store. You can see this e.g. in /var/spool/asterisk. Is there a specific file you want to have on tmpfs that is not? > > Astlinux has HA for the external network interface. If the primary internet link goes down it can failover to a second interface. If you are asking about application layer asterisk HA then I am not aware of anything specific in Astlinux for that -- you would need to research how to do that yourself > > Use rsync for file synchronization? That is what I use for daily backup to a remote system. > > I can understand the interest in HA, but I'm curious what performance issues you are running into with the filesystem, Astlinux is already very efficient here. > > Regards, > David > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...> wrote: > Hi > Thanks for maintaining good project. > 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database? > 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived) > 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? > > Regards > M.Shirazi > > ------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ______________________________ _________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Astlinux-users@lists. sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
|
From: David K. <da...@ke...> - 2017-07-09 16:04:47
|
I'm still curious as to why astdb needs to be on ramdisk. I also read from astdb several times for every incoming call, but I don't write to it. And Linux does a lot of filesystem cacheing... essentially the linux kernel uses every available byte of ram to cache data and programs so that you are not reading from physical disk (or ssd) every time you read from a file. So until you perform a db write I am assuming that the vast majority of my astdb reads are optimized by the linux filesystem and come from ram not ssd. Right? Wrong? David On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 12:13 PM, The Cadillac Kid via Astlinux-users < ast...@li...> wrote: > I run my asterisk DB in RAM on my regular asterisk servers.. I have an > agent that automatically backs that up every so often to set a of files.. > if my asterisk system crashes then it reloads my asterisk DB on boot.. > persistence is maintained via storing my asterisk DB as a datadump style > file on regular storage and not just copying the astdb file (you'll corrupt > it if you do that).. > > its fast.. I use a LOT of astdb lookups in my normal call processing.. > -Christopher > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* David Kerr <da...@ke...> > *To:* Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>; AstLinux Users Mailing > List <ast...@li...> > *Sent:* Saturday, July 8, 2017 12:06 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA > > Astlinux already uses a tmpfs for most files. For those specific files > that need to be persistent astlinux uses a soft link to /mnt/kd which is > persistent store. You can see this e.g. in /var/spool/asterisk. Is there > a specific file you want to have on tmpfs that is not? > > Astlinux has HA for the external network interface. If the primary > internet link goes down it can failover to a second interface. If you are > asking about application layer asterisk HA then I am not aware of anything > specific in Astlinux for that -- you would need to research how to do that > yourself > > Use rsync for file synchronization? That is what I use for daily backup > to a remote system. > > I can understand the interest in HA, but I'm curious what performance > issues you are running into with the filesystem, Astlinux is already very > efficient here. > > Regards, > David > > On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users < > ast...@li...> wrote: > > Hi > Thanks for maintaining good project. > 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for > performance and save other persistence database in another database? > 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived) > 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? > > Regards > M.Shirazi > > ------------------------------ ------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ______________________________ _________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Astlinux-users@lists. sourceforge.net > <Ast...@li...> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users> > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > |
|
From: The C. K. <eld...@ya...> - 2017-07-08 16:13:49
|
I run my asterisk DB in RAM on my regular asterisk servers.. I have an agent that automatically backs that up every so often to set a of files.. if my asterisk system crashes then it reloads my asterisk DB on boot.. persistence is maintained via storing my asterisk DB as a datadump style file on regular storage and not just copying the astdb file (you'll corrupt it if you do that)..
its fast.. I use a LOT of astdb lookups in my normal call processing..
-Christopher
From: David Kerr <da...@ke...>
To: Mehdi Shirazi <mah...@ya...>; AstLinux Users Mailing List <ast...@li...>
Sent: Saturday, July 8, 2017 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] RAMdisk and HA
Astlinux already uses a tmpfs for most files. For those specific files that need to be persistent astlinux uses a soft link to /mnt/kd which is persistent store. You can see this e.g. in /var/spool/asterisk. Is there a specific file you want to have on tmpfs that is not?
Astlinux has HA for the external network interface. If the primary internet link goes down it can failover to a second interface. If you are asking about application layer asterisk HA then I am not aware of anything specific in Astlinux for that -- you would need to research how to do that yourself
Use rsync for file synchronization? That is what I use for daily backup to a remote system.
I can understand the interest in HA, but I'm curious what performance issues you are running into with the filesystem, Astlinux is already very efficient here.
Regards,David
On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users <ast...@li...> wrote:
HiThanks for maintaining good project.1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database?2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived)3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ?
RegardsM.Shirazi
------------------------------ ------------------------------ ------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
______________________________ _________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Astlinux-users@lists. sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/ lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot_______________________________________________
Astlinux-users mailing list
Ast...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users
Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr....
|
|
From: David K. <da...@ke...> - 2017-07-08 16:03:43
|
Astlinux already uses a tmpfs for most files. For those specific files that need to be persistent astlinux uses a soft link to /mnt/kd which is persistent store. You can see this e.g. in /var/spool/asterisk. Is there a specific file you want to have on tmpfs that is not? Astlinux has HA for the external network interface. If the primary internet link goes down it can failover to a second interface. If you are asking about application layer asterisk HA then I am not aware of anything specific in Astlinux for that -- you would need to research how to do that yourself Use rsync for file synchronization? That is what I use for daily backup to a remote system. I can understand the interest in HA, but I'm curious what performance issues you are running into with the filesystem, Astlinux is already very efficient here. Regards, David On Sat, Jul 8, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Mehdi Shirazi via Astlinux-users < ast...@li...> wrote: > Hi > Thanks for maintaining good project. > 1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for > performance and save other persistence database in another database? > 2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived) > 3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? > > Regards > M.Shirazi > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to > pa...@kr.... > |
|
From: Mehdi S. <mah...@ya...> - 2017-07-08 05:33:21
|
HiThanks for maintaining good project.1-Is it possible to put internal Asterisk database in RAMdisk (tmpfs) for performance and save other persistence database in another database?2-Is there any HA solution ? (Active /Standby, keepalived)3-Is there any automatic two way file(database) synchronization utility ? RegardsM.Shirazi |
|
From: Tom C. <nnp...@go...> - 2017-07-04 20:08:49
|
I really can't get this to work. If anyone has such a working setup with Snoms, do let me know. Thanks Tom On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 7:26 PM, Tom Chadwin <nnp...@go...> wrote: > It looks as though firmware_status might be the explanation: > > http://wiki.snom.com/Features/Mass_Deployment/Setting_Files/XML/Firmware > > Tom > > On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 18:25 Tom Chadwin, <nnp...@go...> > wrote: > >> Hello all >> >> With substantial help from Michael K, we have a new AstLinux install, >> provisioning Snom D305s. It's all working apart from transparent firmware >> upgrades. Can anyone give me a sample from their phoneprov setup which >> enables this? I've confirmed the file is where I think it is on the >> AstLinux box, as a manual download gets the file. >> >> Thanks >> >> Tom >> >> PS Thanks so much, Michael! >> > |
|
From: Tom C. <nnp...@go...> - 2017-07-04 18:26:28
|
It looks as though firmware_status might be the explanation: http://wiki.snom.com/Features/Mass_Deployment/Setting_Files/XML/Firmware Tom On Tue, 4 Jul 2017 18:25 Tom Chadwin, <nnp...@go...> wrote: > Hello all > > With substantial help from Michael K, we have a new AstLinux install, > provisioning Snom D305s. It's all working apart from transparent firmware > upgrades. Can anyone give me a sample from their phoneprov setup which > enables this? I've confirmed the file is where I think it is on the > AstLinux box, as a manual download gets the file. > > Thanks > > Tom > > PS Thanks so much, Michael! > |
|
From: Tom C. <nnp...@go...> - 2017-07-04 18:10:22
|
Hello all [Apologies if this is a near duplicate - earlier message appears not to have sent] Does anyone have their phoneprov settings to get Snoms - D305s in our case - to upgrade to a firmware image in /mnt/kd/phoneprov/snom/firmware? I just can't get it to work. Thanks Tom |
|
From: Tom C. <nnp...@go...> - 2017-07-04 17:25:43
|
Hello all With substantial help from Michael K, we have a new AstLinux install, provisioning Snom D305s. It's all working apart from transparent firmware upgrades. Can anyone give me a sample from their phoneprov setup which enables this? I've confirmed the file is where I think it is on the AstLinux box, as a manual download gets the file. Thanks Tom PS Thanks so much, Michael! |
|
From: John N. <jn...@co...> - 2017-06-28 12:32:37
|
Thanks. One cannot be too careful these days Just because one is paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get you!! John Novack Michael Keuter wrote: >> Am 28.06.2017 um 14:07 schrieb John Novack <jn...@co...>: >> >> >> Received an email allegedly from sourceforge asking for confirmation of my subscription to this list. >> >> Can anyone confirm if this is an attempted attack or real >> >> When I go to the link in the footer there is no mention of any conformation >> >> Thanks >> >> >> John Novack > Hi John, > > yes, I got the same. On the SF website I got the confirmation. > > Michael > > http://www.mksolutions.info > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > -- Dog is my Co-pilot |
|
From: Michael K. <li...@mk...> - 2017-06-28 12:14:44
|
> Am 28.06.2017 um 14:07 schrieb John Novack <jn...@co...>: > > > Received an email allegedly from sourceforge asking for confirmation of my subscription to this list. > > Can anyone confirm if this is an attempted attack or real > > When I go to the link in the footer there is no mention of any conformation > > Thanks > > > John Novack Hi John, yes, I got the same. On the SF website I got the confirmation. Michael http://www.mksolutions.info |
|
From: John N. <jn...@co...> - 2017-06-28 12:07:42
|
Received an email allegedly from sourceforge asking for confirmation of my subscription to this list. Can anyone confirm if this is an attempted attack or real When I go to the link in the footer there is no mention of any conformation Thanks John Novack -- Dog is my Co-pilot |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-06-22 22:38:21
|
Announcing Pre-Release Version: astlinux-1.0-8413 Significant update with Linux 3.16 kernel, will eventually become the new AstLinux 1.3 series. The AstLinux Team is regularly upgrading packages containing security and bug fixes as well as adding new features of our own. -- genx86_64-vm board type 1) Add support for VMware Tools (open-vm-tools 10.1.5) 2) Add support for virtio-scsi as a bootable disk driver, also added to RUNNIX 3) Add support for vmw_pvscsi as a bootable disk driver, also added to RUNNIX Note: If you want to test with the "astlinux-1.0-8413-genx86_64-vm.iso" email me privately. -- DAHDI version bump to 2.10.2 -- Asterisk 13.16.0 missing ari.conf crash has been patched and fixed. (Noted by David Kerr with previous pre-release) -- DHCPv6 with Prefix Delegation http://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:tt-dhcpv6-prefix-delegation Note: If you previously enabled DHCPv6 in the Network tab -> Connection Type, see IPv6 Autoconfig: "Assign GUA Prefix" reference. -- IPv6 ULA / NPTv6 Configuration http://doc.astlinux-project.org/userdoc:tt_ipv6_ula_nptv6_config -- Traffic Shaper how uses fq_codel (Fair Queueing CoDel) for both 'htb' and 'hfsc' types. Give 'hfsc' a try. -- The default serial baud rate is now 115200 instead of the previous 19200. Upgrading RUNNIX will default to 115200. These pre-release images are for those who would like to take advantage of the AstLinux development before the next official release, as well as providing testing for the project. The "AstLinux Pre-Release ChangeLog" and "Repository URL" entries can be found under the "Development" tab of the AstLinux Project web site ... AstLinux Project -> Development http://www.astlinux-project.org/dev.html While these images are considered 'stable', the lack of testing will not make these images suitable for critical production systems. If you should come across an issue, please report back here. AstLinux Team |
|
From: Lonnie A. <li...@lo...> - 2017-06-14 23:24:18
|
Hi Michael, Rolling your own dnsmasq.conf is a non-trivial matter and possibly would make the Network tab confusing if many things no longer worked. Over all the years, I don't recall having particular DHCP options set on a "data" LAN subnet has ever proven to be an issue. As Christopher reported, even if a device (Intel NUC) had PXE booting ahead of Disk booting it should still work, of course having Disk ahead of PXE would be best. Regardless what the DHCP response contains, it is up to the client configuration what it does with them. Lonnie On Jun 14, 2017, at 5:47 PM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > Hi Lonnie > > Im not sure that Option 66 is actually the issue here now I have done further testing however I would certainly rather not be sending out this Option at all. > Unfortunately you can only add or change items with dnsmasq.static, you cannot remove them. > > Looks like the best option is to roll my own. > > Thanks everyone for your help. > > Regards > Michael Knill > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lonnie Abelbeck <li...@lo...> > Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Date: Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 12:07 am > To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> > Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Dnsmasq, TFTP Option 66 and PXE Boot > > Michael, > > First, I have never heard of an issue like this. > > The DHCP option 66 is sent regardless if the TFTP server is enabled or not, as it can be used for HTTP and HTTPS services as well. > > Can't you disable PXE booting in the BIOS of your Intel NUC’s ? It would seem to me that is where the problem is. > > Lonnie > > > > On Jun 14, 2017, at 12:27 AM, Michael Knill <mic...@ip...> wrote: > >> So is my only option here to maintain my own copy of dnsmasq.conf or is there a better way e.g. edit the init process to remove the TFTP options? >> Maybe a TFTP checkbox on the Network Tab against the interface or something similar? >> >> Regards >> Michael Knill >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> >> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Date: Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 8:55 pm >> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Dnsmasq, TFTP Option 66 and PXE Boot >> >>> Am 08.06.2017 um 10:33 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: >>> >>> Yes I thought about tags but really I would rather is not be sent at all. >>> Any other options for doing this? >>> >>> Regards >>> Michael Knill >> >> I have not tested how setting to null behaves: >> >> dhcp-option=lan,option:tftp-server,"" >> >> Needs to be tested. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> >>> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Date: Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 6:20 pm >>> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Dnsmasq, TFTP Option 66 and PXE Boot >>> >>>> Am 08.06.2017 um 09:48 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: >>>> >>>> Hi Michael >>>> So I already have enable-tftp=eth1.100,tun0 and the data interface is eth1. I think this command is for turning ON TFTP when DHCP is turned OFF. >>>> /etc/dnsmasq.conf has the tftp-server option included so I assume that it will still be there. >>>> >>>> Is there any way I can look at the actual config? >>>> I think I might plug a machine in and really see what I am getting. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Michael Knill >>> >>> OK, there might be another way around this with tags. >>> E.g.: >>> >>> ---- >>> dhcp-mac=set:yealink,00:15:65:*:*:* >>> dhcp-mac=set:phones,00:15:65:*:*:* >>> dhcp-option=tag:yealink,option:tftp-server,"http://192.168.102.1/phoneprov/yealink/" >>> >>> dhcp-mac=set:snom,00:04:13:*:*:* >>> dhcp-mac=set:phones,00:04:13:*:*:* >>> dhcp-option=tag:snom,option:tftp-server,"http://192.168.102.1/phoneprov/snom/" >>> >>> #dhcp-boot=tag:!phones,thinstation/pxelinux.0,pbx3,192.168.100.3 >>> ---- >>> >>> This way only "non-phones" would get the last "dhcp-boot" option >>> You could of course make other (more useful) tags. >>> >>> Just keep in mind "/etc/dnsmasq.conf" is automatically created and then "/mnt/kd/dnsmasq.static" is included into it. >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Michael Keuter <li...@mk...> >>>> Reply-To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>>> Date: Thursday, 8 June 2017 at 5:39 pm >>>> To: AstLinux List <ast...@li...> >>>> Subject: Re: [Astlinux-users] Dnsmasq, TFTP Option 66 and PXE Boot >>>> >>>>> Am 08.06.2017 um 09:29 schrieb Michael Knill <mic...@ip...>: >>>>> >>>>> Hi group >>>>> >>>>> What is the best way to provide DHCP on an interface but turn off TFTP? >>>>> I have some Intel NUC’s on my data VLAN and I am providing DHCP and I suspect they are having bootup issues because they are trying to do a PXE boot from Option 66 which is being passed to them on the data VLAN! >>>>> >>>>> Can I set it to NULL e.g. dhcp-option=lan,option:tftp-server,"" >>>>> >>>>> Has anyone had this issue before? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> Michael Knill >>>> >>>> Hi Michael, >>>> >>>> from our AstLinux changelog :-) >>>> >>>> -- dnsmasq, version bump to 2.68, new feature allows "enable-tftp=" to define allowed interfaces for TFTP. >>>> More Info: View file "/stat/etc/dnsmasq.static" for syntax and make changes to "/mnt/kd/dnsmasq.static". >>>> >>>> Michael >>> >>> Michael >> >> >> Michael >> >> http://www.mksolutions.info >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >> _______________________________________________ >> Astlinux-users mailing list >> Ast...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users >> >> Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Astlinux-users mailing list > Ast...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/astlinux-users > > Donations to support AstLinux are graciously accepted via PayPal to pa...@kr.... |
63 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
