You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(93) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(62) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(61) |
Apr
(83) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(26) |
2003 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(10) |
2004 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(20) |
2005 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(7) |
2007 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(5) |
2008 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2010 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Adam M. <Ada...@in...> - 2007-09-19 12:28:51
|
Does anyone know if a 64bit version of the libgcc_s.a library will available in the near future? =20 |
From: Reza A. <ar...@au...> - 2007-08-23 15:21:53
|
On 23 Aug 2007, 09:58AM CDT, Frank Bartucca <bar...@us...> wrote: > Where is libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0 for AIX? At some point (probably in GNOME 2.0), it was moved to the gtk2 package. <ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/aix/freeSoftware/aixtoolbox/RPMS/ppc/gtk2/gtk2-2.8.3-9.aix5.1.ppc.rpm> -- Reza Arbab ar...@au... |
From: Rainer T. <ta...@ta...> - 2007-08-02 10:05:11
|
Hello, Brian Likosar wrote: > --- Rainer Tammer <ta...@ta...> wrote: > > >> Hello, >> >> hdkutz wrote: >> >>> The commands differ! Check the man page and info >>> >> of /opt/freeware/bin/hostname. >> >>> >>> >> I know. This is not the problem. >> > > Two things I do as a "best practice": > 1. Don't compile code as root, only run the "make > install" step as root. A non-root user should not be > able to run "hostname -s" to successfully rename the > host. > Yes, thats right. This is the cause why it took us over 10 years to find out that we had a bug in our .profile/.env (call to hostname -s without a full path to hostname).... > 2. On AIX, when performing compiles, change your path > so that "/usr/linux/bin" is at the beginning of your > path, so that all GNU utilities find what they expect. > > I can only agree partially with this. I always try to build the packages with the native OS tools. The thing which concerns me the most is that if the root user executes a script with a call to hostname -s with the wrong path it might be possible to "destroy" the hostname. The GNU hostname should reject all hostnames starting or ending with an "-" because this hostname would be illegal (according to the standard RFCs). > Brian > > > Bye Rainer > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. > http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ > > > |
From: Brian L. <bjl...@ya...> - 2007-08-02 03:34:09
|
--- Rainer Tammer <ta...@ta...> wrote: > Hello, > > hdkutz wrote: > > The commands differ! Check the man page and info > of /opt/freeware/bin/hostname. > > > I know. This is not the problem. Two things I do as a "best practice": 1. Don't compile code as root, only run the "make install" step as root. A non-root user should not be able to run "hostname -s" to successfully rename the host. 2. On AIX, when performing compiles, change your path so that "/usr/linux/bin" is at the beginning of your path, so that all GNU utilities find what they expect. Brian ____________________________________________________________________________________ Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles. Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center. http://autos.yahoo.com/green_center/ |
From: <St...@bc...> - 2007-07-31 19:02:17
|
I will be out of the office starting 07/20/2007 and will not return until 08/21/2007. I will not be able to check email but I will respond to your message when I return. If you need assistance with a production issue please contact the Helpdesk at 312-653-6675 or Production Supervisor Ken Lelito at 312-653-3467 ********** The information contained in this communication is confidential, private, proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately at (312)653-6000 in Illinois; (800)835-8699 in New Mexico; (918)560-3500 in Oklahoma; or (972)766-6900 in Texas. ********** |
From: Reza A. <ar...@au...> - 2007-07-31 17:43:00
|
On 31 Jul 2007, 12:23PM CDT, Bryan Henderson <hb...@us...> wrote: > I've been compiling a list as I build systems of the order in which the > packages have to be installed, to save me the iterative effort of > resolving broken dependencies (I usually install about 30 packages from > the CD). Is there a better way? I think once you've done the legwork once and have a master list of everything that you need to install for a particular package, you could use that list as an argument to "rpm -i" on a different system to install everything in one shot. -- Reza Arbab ar...@au... |
From: Bryan H. <hb...@us...> - 2007-07-31 17:23:31
|
>$ cd /opt/freeware/lib >$ rpm -qf libcrypto.a libgdbm.a libssl.a >openssl-0.9.7l-1 >gdbm-1.8.3-2 >openssl-0.9.7l-1 I forgot that RPM doesn't resolve dependencies automatically, so maybe those RPMs are in fact on the CD and it just wasn't obvious which ones they are. I've been compiling a list as I build systems of the order in which the packages have to be installed, to save me the iterative effort of resolving broken dependencies (I usually install about 30 packages from the CD). Is there a better way? |
From: Bryan H. <hb...@us...> - 2007-07-31 17:11:56
|
> libcrypto.a(libcrypto.so.0.9.7) is needed by python-2.3.4-2 > libgdbm.a(libgdbm.so.3) is needed by python-2.3.4-2 > libssl.a(libssl.so.0.9.7) is needed by python-2.3.4-2 > python = 2.2 is needed by tkinter-2.2-4 >ces rpm ne sont pas sur le cd aix toolbox for linux , est ce qu'on peut >faire un install avec --nodeps ? I don't know how well Python works without those, but I can tell you where to get them. libcrypto and libssl are part of Openssl, which is not on the CD because of IBM fears about violating export laws. You can get it from the web site. Go to the special "cryptographic content" link on the right side of the page. I don't know why gdbm isn't on the CD, but it's on the web site in the normal place. http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/aix/products/aixos/linux/download.html |
From: Reza A. <ar...@au...> - 2007-07-31 14:48:02
|
Hello, On 31 Jul 2007, 07:21AM CDT, han...@bu... wrote: > libcrypto.a(libcrypto.so.0.9.7) is needed by python-2.3.4-2 > libgdbm.a(libgdbm.so.3) is needed by python-2.3.4-2 > libssl.a(libssl.so.0.9.7) is needed by python-2.3.4-2 $ cd /opt/freeware/lib $ rpm -qf libcrypto.a libgdbm.a libssl.a openssl-0.9.7l-1 gdbm-1.8.3-2 openssl-0.9.7l-1 -- Reza Arbab ar...@au... |
From: <han...@bu...> - 2007-07-31 12:20:45
|
Bonjour monsieur, rpm -Uvh de python-2.3.4-2.aix5.1.ppc.rpm sur aix 5200-02 produit le message d'erreur suivant: error: failed dependencies: libcrypto.a(libcrypto.so.0.9.7) is needed by python-2.3.4-2 libgdbm.a(libgdbm.so.3) is needed by python-2.3.4-2 libssl.a(libssl.so.0.9.7) is needed by python-2.3.4-2 python =3D 2.2 is needed by tkinter-2.2-4 ces rpm ne sont pas sur le cd aix toolbox for linux , est ce qu'on peut= faire un install avec --nodeps ? Merci pour votre aide . CDLT NOTICE: This message contains information which is confidential and = the copyright of our company or a third party. If you are not the inten= ded recipient of this message please delete it and destroy all copies. I= f you are the intended recipient of this message you should not disclose o= r distribute this message to third parties without the consent of our company. Our company does not represent, warrant and/or guarantee th= at the integrity of this message has been maintained nor that the communication is free of virus, interception or interference. The liability of our company is limited by our General Conditions of Services. Nota : Ce message contient des informations confidentielles propri=E9= t=E9 de notre soci=E9t=E9 et/ou d'un tiers. Si vous n'=EAtes pas parmi les destinataires d=E9sign=E9s de ce message, merci de l'effacer ainsi q= ue toutes ses copies. Si vous =EAtes parmi les destinataires d=E9sign=E9= s de ce message, pri=E8re de ne pas le divulguer ni de le transmettre =E0 de= s tiers sans l'accord de notre soci=E9t=E9. Notre soci=E9t=E9 ne peut garant= ir que l'int=E9grit=E9 de ce message a =E9t=E9 pr=E9serv=E9e ni que la pr=E9= sente communication est sans virus, interception ou interf=E9rence. La responsabilit=E9 de notre soci=E9t=E9 est limit=E9e par nos Conditio= ns G=E9n=E9rales de Services. = |
From: hdkutz <hd...@hd...> - 2007-07-31 09:30:11
|
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:49:23AM +0200, Rainer Tammer wrote: > Hello, > > hdkutz wrote: > > The commands differ! Check the man page and info of /opt/freeware/bin/hostname. > > > I know. This is not the problem. > > But is I execute existing configure (automake, mc, ...) scripts I have > no influence on the commands executed. Hello Rainer, oh, you have, why couldn't you change the configure script. It's a normal shellfile no executable. > I have observed several times that the configure scripts __destroy__ my > hostname !! > > Furthermore a hostname starting wih "-" is not valid !! > > Note: > Unlike domain names, hostname labels can only be made up of the ASCII > letters 'a' through 'z' (case-insensitive), > the digits '0' through '9', and the hyphen. Labels can not start nor end > with a hyphen. Special characters other than > the hyphen (and the dot between labels) are not allowed, although they > are sometimes used anyway. > > So the fact that GNU hostname sets the "-s" as a hostname violates > standard RFCs !! Difficult to say. Your auto(make|conf) are not the IBM-RPM Packages. Maybe thats your problem. Try not to use the hostname-Command from GNU-Toolbox. The hostname Command only does what you ask him to do. From the manpage you can see that AIXTOOLBOX GNU-Hostname doesn't support any Switch (only --help and --version). If you (or some Script) execute /opt/freeware/bin/hostname -s bla why are you wondering that your hostname is "-s"? Cheers, ku -- C-3PO: We seem to be made to suffer. It's our lot in life. |
From: Rainer T. <ta...@ta...> - 2007-07-31 08:49:29
|
Hello, hdkutz wrote: > The commands differ! Check the man page and info of /opt/freeware/bin/hostname. > I know. This is not the problem. But is I execute existing configure (automake, mc, ...) scripts I have no influence on the commands executed. I have observed several times that the configure scripts __destroy__ my hostname !! Furthermore a hostname starting wih "-" is not valid !! Note: Unlike domain names, hostname labels can only be made up of the ASCII letters 'a' through 'z' (case-insensitive), the digits '0' through '9', and the hyphen. Labels can not start nor end with a hyphen. Special characters other than the hyphen (and the dot between labels) are not allowed, although they are sometimes used anyway. So the fact that GNU hostname sets the "-s" as a hostname violates standard RFCs !! This is a list of my installed rpm's: cdrecord-1.9-4 mkisofs-1.13-4 bash-2.05b-1 glib-1.2.10-2 gtk+-1.2.10-4 libpng-1.2.18-0 (not from IBM) xpm-3.4k-7 bash-doc-2.05b-1 zip-2.3-3 unzip-5.42-2 bzip2-1.0.2-2 gzip-1.2.4a-7 zlib-1.1.4-4 zlib-devel-1.1.4-4 glib-devel-1.2.10-2 gtk+-devel-1.2.10-4 popt-1.5-30 rpm-3.0.5-30 rpm-build-3.0.5-30 rpm-devel-3.0.5-30 m4-1.4-14 libtool-1.5.8-1 autoconf-2.61-1 (not from IBM) lynx-2.8.4-1 info-4.6-1 texinfo-4.6-1 readline-4.3-1 readline-devel-4.3-1 patch-2.5.4-4 wget-1.9-2 expect-5.34-8 tcl-8.3.3-8 tk-8.3.3-8 tar-1.13-4 sudo-1.6.7p5-2 libungif-4.1.2-1 libungif-devel-4.1.2-1 libungif-progs-4.1.2-1 libtiff-3.6.1-2 libtiff-devel-3.6.1-2 libpng-devel-1.2.18-0 (not from IBM) gdbm-1.8.3-2 libjpeg-6b-6 libjpeg-devel-6b-6 libmng-1.0.3-2 libmng-devel-1.0.3-2 gettext-0.10.40-1 gawk-3.1.3-1 flex-2.5.4a-6 bison-1.875-2 gdbm-devel-1.8.3-2 freetype-1.3.1-9 freetype-demo-1.3.1-9 freetype-devel-1.3.1-9 freetype2-2.1.7-2 freetype2-devel-2.1.7-2 expat-1.95.7-1 expat-devel-1.95.7-1 binutils-2.14-3 gcc-3.3.2-4 gdb-2.9.aix51.020209-4 gcc-c++-3.3.2-4 indent-2.2.7-2 xpm-devel-3.4k-7 openssl-0.9.6m-1 coreutils-5.0-2 openssl-devel-0.9.6m-1 openssl-doc-0.9.6m-1 make-3.80-1 ncurses-5.2-3 ncurses-devel-5.2-3 slang-1.4.4-2 slang-devel-1.4.4-2 ddd-3.3.1-2 diffutils-2.8.1-1 AIX-rpm-5.2.0.95-3 fontconfig-2.2.2-3 fontconfig-devel-2.2.2-3 automake-1.10-1 (not from IBM) > <snip> > File: coreutils.info, Node: hostname invocation, Next: hostid invocation, Pr\ > ev: uname invocation, Up: System context > > `hostname': Print or set system name > ==================================== > > With no arguments, `hostname' prints the name of the current host > system. With one argument, it sets the current host name to the > specified string. You must have appropriate privileges to set the host > name. Synopsis: > > hostname [NAME] > > The only options are `--help' and `--version'. *Note Common > options::. > > An exit status of zero indicates success, and a nonzero value > indicates failure. > <snip> > > Cheers, > ku > Bye Rainer |
From: hdkutz <hd...@hd...> - 2007-07-31 06:47:53
|
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:07:07AM +0200, Rainer Tammer wrote: > Hello, > I have fond a (severe) bug in coreutils-5.0-2 hostname command which > drove me crazy. > > If you enter: hostname -s (AIX version) you will get the short hostname > If you enter: hostname -s (Toolbox version) the hostname ist set to "-s" !! > > AIX version > > # /usr/bin/hostname > service > > Toolbox version > # /opt/freeware/bin/hostname > service > > AIX version > > # /usr/bin/hostname -s > service > > Toolbox version > > # /opt/freeware/bin/hostname -s > (no output) > > Now the hostname is -s > > AIX version > # /usr/bin/hostname > -s > > I discovered the problem during "configure" runs. > > Is this a known problem ?? > > Bye > Rainer The commands differ! Check the man page and info of /opt/freeware/bin/hostname. <snip> File: coreutils.info, Node: hostname invocation, Next: hostid invocation, Pr\ ev: uname invocation, Up: System context `hostname': Print or set system name ==================================== With no arguments, `hostname' prints the name of the current host system. With one argument, it sets the current host name to the specified string. You must have appropriate privileges to set the host name. Synopsis: hostname [NAME] The only options are `--help' and `--version'. *Note Common options::. An exit status of zero indicates success, and a nonzero value indicates failure. <snip> Cheers, ku -- Ben (Obi-Wan) Kenobi: You must learn the ways of the Force if you are to come with me to Alderaan. |
From: Rainer T. <ta...@ta...> - 2007-07-31 06:07:14
|
Hello, I have fond a (severe) bug in coreutils-5.0-2 hostname command which drove me crazy. If you enter: hostname -s (AIX version) you will get the short hostname If you enter: hostname -s (Toolbox version) the hostname ist set to "-s" !! AIX version # /usr/bin/hostname service Toolbox version # /opt/freeware/bin/hostname service AIX version # /usr/bin/hostname -s service Toolbox version # /opt/freeware/bin/hostname -s (no output) Now the hostname is -s AIX version # /usr/bin/hostname -s I discovered the problem during "configure" runs. Is this a known problem ?? Bye Rainer |
From: Aaron W M. <aar...@gm...> - 2007-07-24 23:02:07
|
Hello all, This was also posted earlier this year. There is a bug with wu-ftpd on AIX when you run 'ls' with any parameters. ('ls' with no parameters works fine) eg.... $ ftp localhost Connected to loopback. 220- Name (localhost:foo): 331 Password required for foo. Password: 230 User foo logged in. Access restrictions apply. ftp> ls -l 200 PORT command successful. 550 /bin/ls -l: Not enough space. A quick search on Google shows that others have been having this issue for quite a while with no success: Reference: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=3bn&q=wu-ftpd+aix+%22550+%2Fbin%2Fls%22+%22Not+enough+space%22&btnG=Search A post on a bugtrac mailing list seems to indicate that it might have something to do with a couple of the most recent vulnerability patches for wu-ftpd. Reference: http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2003/Aug/0210.html Also, here is a truss trace of the above transacation where I run 'ls -l': <snip> 1114188: 2125943: kread(0, " N L S T - l\r\n 0 , 0".., 4096) = 9 1114188: 2125943: incinterval(0, 0x2FF21888, 0x2FF21898) = 0 1114188: 2125943: _getpid() = 1114188 1114188: 2125943: open("/dev/null", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC) Err#2 ENOENT 1114188: 2125943: send(3, 0x2FF21094, 78, 0) = 78 1114188: 2125943: statx("-l", 0x2FF21848, 128, 010) Err#2 ENOENT 1114188: 2125943: statx("-l", 0x2FF21848, 128, 011) Err#2 ENOENT 1114188: 2125943: sigprocmask(0, 0x00000000, 0x20011428) = 0 1114188: 2125943: statx("-l", 0x2FF21848, 128, 010) Err#2 ENOENT 1114188: 2125943: statx("-l", 0x2FF21848, 128, 011) Err#2 ENOENT 1114188: 2125943: open(".", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 8 1114188: 2125943: statx("-l", 0x2FF1FA50, 128, 011) Err#2 ENOENT 1114188: 2125943: statx(".", 0x2FF1E990, 76, 0) = 0 1114188: 2125943: open(".", O_RDONLY) = 9 1114188: 2125943: getdirent64(9, 0x20059CA8, 4096) = 1016 1114188: 2125943: klseek(9, 0, 0, 0x00000000) = 0 1114188: 2125943: kfcntl(9, F_GETFD, 0x20013D24) = 0 1114188: 2125943: kfcntl(9, F_SETFD, 0x00000001) = 0 1114188: 2125943: close(9) = 0 1114188: 2125943: statx("/", 0x2FF1EAF8, 176, 020) = 0 1114188: 2125943: statx("./", 0x2FF1EAF8, 176, 020) = 0 1114188: 2125943: fchdir(8) = 0 1114188: 2125943: close(8) = 0 1114188: 2125943: appgetrlimit(7, 0x2FF1F1F0) = 0 1114188: 2125943: kwrite(1, " 5 5 0 / b i n / l s ".., 35) = 35 <snip> Finally, my pertinent system info: AIX 5300-05 wu-ftpd-2.6.2-6 Any help would be most appreciated. -- Aaron W Morris (decep) |
From: Kim C. <kch...@ce...> - 2007-07-13 20:30:32
|
I will be out of the office starting 06/30/2007 and will not return until 07/30/2007. Please contact Jean-Pierre Dehenne, 416-448-6307, for any issues that cannot wait until I return. |
From: Paul S. <pa...@ll...> - 2007-07-13 18:58:01
|
Hi Reza, Thank you very much for this quick solution. Thanks again Paul -----Original Message----- From: aix...@li... [mailto:aix...@li...] On Behalf Of Reza Arbab Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 09:21 To: aix...@li... Subject: Re: [tbox-l] popt Hi Paul, On 12 Jul 2007, 03:03PM CDT, Paul Szepietowski <pa...@ll...> wrote: > Does IBM plan to release a 64-bit version for the popt-1.7-1 package? I rebuilt this to include a 64-bit member in the shared library: <ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/aix/freeSoftware/aixtoolbox/RPMS/ppc/rpm/popt-1.7-2.aix5.1.ppc.rpm> Please note the popt package is a little strange. It supplies /opt/freeware/lib/libpopt.so, but that is deprecated. It's kept for backward compatibility. Please use these: /opt/freeware/lib/libpopt.a(libpopt.so.0) /opt/freeware/lib/libpopt.a(libpopt64.so.0) (what I just added) They should really be *.so.1 since this is popt-1.7, but changing that now would undoubtedly break somebody and I want to make the most minimal change. -- Reza Arbab ar...@au... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ aixtoolbox-list mailing list aix...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list |
From: Mike S. <Mik...@ha...> - 2007-07-13 16:22:50
|
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of the London Borough of Havering, are confidential, may be subject to legal privilege and are intended only for the person(s) or organisation(s) named above. Any unauthorised use, retention, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your system. WARNING: It is your responsibility to take all necessary steps to ensure this e-mail and any attachments to it are free from viruses. |
From: Reza A. <ar...@au...> - 2007-07-13 16:21:25
|
Hi Paul, On 12 Jul 2007, 03:03PM CDT, Paul Szepietowski <pa...@ll...> wrote: > Does IBM plan to release a 64-bit version for the popt-1.7-1 package? I rebuilt this to include a 64-bit member in the shared library: <ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/aix/freeSoftware/aixtoolbox/RPMS/ppc/rpm/popt-1.7-2.aix5.1.ppc.rpm> Please note the popt package is a little strange. It supplies /opt/freeware/lib/libpopt.so, but that is deprecated. It's kept for backward compatibility. Please use these: /opt/freeware/lib/libpopt.a(libpopt.so.0) /opt/freeware/lib/libpopt.a(libpopt64.so.0) (what I just added) They should really be *.so.1 since this is popt-1.7, but changing that now would undoubtedly break somebody and I want to make the most minimal change. -- Reza Arbab ar...@au... |
From: Paul S. <pa...@ll...> - 2007-07-12 20:03:32
|
Does IBM plan to release a 64-bit version for the popt-1.7-1 package? Paul |
From: Bryan H. <hb...@us...> - 2007-05-11 20:31:39
|
>libgcc_s is part of the libgcc RPM. Thanks a lot. Works great. Seems like RPM ought to recognize the libgcc package as a prerequisite of gcc-c++. |
From: Pythagoras W. <py...@ll...> - 2007-05-11 18:14:48
|
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:46:05AM -0700, Bryan Henderson wrote: :I recently upgraded to gcc-4.0.0-1 and gcc-c++-4.0.0-1 and now a C++ :program compiled under the previous gcc3 will not run and C++ compiles :fail. : :The problem is there is no libgcc_s.a on my system, and presumably there :used to be. g++ does a "-lgcc_s", so it's required. I looked at an old :gcc-3.3.2-3.aix5.1.ppm.rpm and it does not appear to contain libgcc_s.a :either. : :Where am I supposed to get libgcc_s? libgcc_s is part of the libgcc RPM. Pick the appropriate one of: libgcc-4.0.0-1.aix5.1.ppc.rpm libgcc-4.0.0-1.aix5.2.ppc.rpm libgcc-4.0.0-1.aix5.3.ppc.rpm However, if you are doing dynamic 64-bit builds, it still won't work: $ echo "int main() { }" > foo.c $ /opt/freeware/bin/g++ -maix64 -o foo foo.c ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .__register_frame_info_table ld: 0711-317 ERROR: Undefined symbol: .__deregister_frame_info ld: 0711-345 Use the -bloadmap or -bnoquiet option to obtain more information. collect2: ld returned 8 exit status That is due to there being no 64-bit shared object. In the 3.3.2 series, there was a separate library file called libgcc_s_ppc64.a that 64-builds would use. No such thing exists in the 4.0.0 series. Also, note that the pthread-specific versions of libgcc_s are also missing. -- Pythagoras Watson, LLNL ASC Systems Administrator |
From: Bryan H. <hb...@us...> - 2007-05-11 16:46:14
|
I recently upgraded to gcc-4.0.0-1 and gcc-c++-4.0.0-1 and now a C++ program compiled under the previous gcc3 will not run and C++ compiles fail. The problem is there is no libgcc_s.a on my system, and presumably there used to be. g++ does a "-lgcc_s", so it's required. I looked at an old gcc-3.3.2-3.aix5.1.ppm.rpm and it does not appear to contain libgcc_s.a either. Where am I supposed to get libgcc_s? I found I could work around this with a -static-gcc option. That causes g++ to use -lgcc_eh instead, and libgcc_eh.a is in the gcc-4.0.0 RPM. |
From: Ronda M. <ro...@us...> - 2007-04-24 21:09:29
|
The xrender rpm package contains /opt/freeware/include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h which has a #include for render.h. This file cannot be located on my AIX 5.3 TL5 system. #include <X11/extensions/render.h> > rpm -qa | grep ren xrender-0.8.4-7 Any suggestions on how to get this file? Ronda Marshall Staff SW Engineer BT/IT STG, Dept F1XA AIX, Engineering tools, Performance and Analysis T/L 553-1646 |
From: johnf <jfo...@ya...> - 2007-04-18 05:26:02
|
Hi, I'm using AIX 5.3, TL 5, SP 1 and I downloaded and installed the wu-ftpd from the aixtoolbox site. I setup a user (chroot and non-chroot) and they work fine except for the "dir" command. The dir command shows "/bin/ls -lgA : Not enough space". Is this a bug? Just using 'ls' won't be enough. We need the sizes of the files. Thanks. JohnF __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com |