You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(85) |
Apr
(93) |
May
(55) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(62) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(37) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(51) |
Feb
(86) |
Mar
(61) |
Apr
(83) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(46) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(26) |
2003 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(43) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(95) |
May
(43) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(27) |
Oct
(31) |
Nov
(33) |
Dec
(10) |
2004 |
Jan
(40) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(31) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(27) |
Aug
(38) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(20) |
2005 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(7) |
2007 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(5) |
2008 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2010 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2011 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: David C. <cl...@au...> - 2004-11-29 21:13:21
|
You're right; I didn't realize that. It's actually in /usr/bin/X11/gvim, so you will want /usr/bin/X11 in your path. If you are running X applications like xterm (etc) that directory is usually in your path already, but if not you can add it. On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 09:55:56AM -0800, Kiran N. Mehta wrote: > --- David Clissold <cl...@au...> wrote: > > $ rpm -qa |grep vim > > vim-enhanced-6.0.147-5 > > vim-minimal-6.0.147-5 > > vim-X11-6.0.147-5 > > vim-common-6.0.147-5 > > Thanks David, I do see all four packages listed but I don't see > gvim under /opt/freeware/bin the way I do see vim et.al. > > Regards, > Kiran -- David Clissold cl...@au... |
From: Kiran N. M. <kir...@ya...> - 2004-11-29 20:56:02
|
--- David Clissold <cl...@au...> wrote: > $ rpm -qa |grep vim > vim-enhanced-6.0.147-5 > vim-minimal-6.0.147-5 > vim-X11-6.0.147-5 > vim-common-6.0.147-5 Thanks David, I do see all four packages listed but I don't see gvim under /opt/freeware/bin the way I do see vim et.al. Regards, Kiran __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! http://my.yahoo.com |
From: David C. <cl...@au...> - 2004-11-29 19:30:49
|
vim is split into different packages depending on whether you want the graphical version or not. You can get gvim in the "vim-X11" package. $ rpm -qa |grep vim vim-enhanced-6.0.147-5 vim-minimal-6.0.147-5 vim-X11-6.0.147-5 vim-common-6.0.147-5 vim-enhanced contains the "Huge version, without GUI" ("vim"). vim-minimal contains the "Tiny version without GUI." ("vi"). vim-X11 contains the "Huge version with GTK GUI." ("gvim"). vim-common has common files required for all of the above packages, and must be installed as a requirement for any of the other three. On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 02:39:16AM -0800, Kiran N. Mehta wrote: > --- Philip K Warren <pk...@us...> wrote: > > Please try downloading vim 6.0.147-5, which was just updated the > > other day to include a fix for this issue. > > Thanks Philip, this worked! However, I don't see gvim in this > bundle and vim --version says it's a "Huge Version, without GUI." > Is any release schedule about the GUI version known? Thanks. > > Regards, > Kiran > > _______________________________________________ > aixtoolbox-list mailing list > aix...@ww... > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list -- David Clissold cl...@au... |
From: Kiran N. M. <kir...@ya...> - 2004-11-26 13:39:22
|
--- Philip K Warren <pk...@us...> wrote: > Please try downloading vim 6.0.147-5, which was just updated the > other day to include a fix for this issue. Thanks Philip, this worked! However, I don't see gvim in this bundle and vim --version says it's a "Huge Version, without GUI." Is any release schedule about the GUI version known? Thanks. Regards, Kiran __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com |
From: Philip K W. <pk...@us...> - 2004-11-24 22:14:03
|
Please try downloading vim 6.0.147-5, which was just updated the other day to include a fix for this issue. You can get it from the following location: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/aix/freeSoftware/aixtoolbox/RPMS/ppc/vim/ -- Philip K. Warren pk...@us... Phone: 512.838.8924 T/L 678.8924 aix...@ww... wrote on 11/24/2004 12:32:23 PM: > I'm seeing the same issue on a few of my 5200-03 boxes, but not all. > Even though I get the error, my editing operations succeed. > _______________________________________________ > aixtoolbox-list mailing list > aix...@ww... > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list |
From: Aaron M. <aar...@gm...> - 2004-11-24 21:33:59
|
I'm seeing the same issue on a few of my 5200-03 boxes, but not all. Even though I get the error, my editing operations succeed. On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 04:55:04 -0800 (PST), Kiran N. Mehta <kir...@ya...> wrote: > Hello: > > On my AIX 5100-04 machine, I see two copies of vim: > I /usr/local/bin/vim > (apparently open source compiled by someone in-house on 2002Dec5) > II /opt/freeware/bin/vim > (most likely from IBM Provided CD, compiled on 2002 Apr 23) > Both executables have a problem wherein apart from moving the > cursor around no significant editing operation is possible (yields > the error "E363: pattern caused out-of-stack error"). > > $ rpm -qa | grep vim yields: > vim-common-6.0.147-1 > vim-minimal-6.0.147-1 > vim-enhanced-6.0.147-1 > vim-X11-6.0.147-1 > > $ ulimit -a | grep stack shows: > stack(kbytes) 4194304 > > Any help/clues? > > Thanks, > Kiran > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo > _______________________________________________ > aixtoolbox-list mailing list > aix...@ww... > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list > |
From: Kiran N. M. <kir...@ya...> - 2004-11-24 15:55:16
|
Hello: On my AIX 5100-04 machine, I see two copies of vim: I /usr/local/bin/vim (apparently open source compiled by someone in-house on 2002Dec5) II /opt/freeware/bin/vim (most likely from IBM Provided CD, compiled on 2002 Apr 23) Both executables have a problem wherein apart from moving the cursor around no significant editing operation is possible (yields the error "E363: pattern caused out-of-stack error"). $ rpm -qa | grep vim yields: vim-common-6.0.147-1 vim-minimal-6.0.147-1 vim-enhanced-6.0.147-1 vim-X11-6.0.147-1 $ ulimit -a | grep stack shows: stack(kbytes) 4194304 Any help/clues? Thanks, Kiran __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Get it on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/maildemo |
From: David C. <dn...@ya...> - 2004-11-24 02:29:16
|
The OpenSSL images in the Toolbox is already built with 64-bit library members included. To link to the 64-bit versions of libcrypto.a or libssl.a, you just specify -X64 on the link line or OBJECT_MODE=64 in the environment when you build/link 64-bit executables. See also in the mail archives: http://www-124.ibm.com/pipermail/aixtoolbox-list/2004-March/001731.html (Excuse the possible duplicate reply; I cc'ed the list from my normal account and it seems not to have gotten posted -- the same thing happened yesterday on my reply to the fileutils question). --- Michael Valley <va...@ll...> wrote: > Hi, > > My customer is requesting a 64bit version of openssl. Anything in > the > works for this? > > -- > Michael Valley, IBM (mrv...@us...) > 925-424-4184 > Bldg. 116; Rm. 2621 > va...@ll... ===== -David __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com |
From: Michael V. <va...@ll...> - 2004-11-24 01:12:06
|
Hi, My customer is requesting a 64bit version of openssl. Anything in the works for this? -- Michael Valley, IBM (mrv...@us...) 925-424-4184 Bldg. 116; Rm. 2621 va...@ll... |
From: Philip K W. <pk...@us...> - 2004-11-22 23:57:01
|
Charles: The fileutils, sh-utils, and textutils packages were all rolled into one package called coreutils. It can be downloaded from here: ftp://ftp.software.ibm.com/aix/freeSoftware/aixtoolbox/RPMS/ppc/coreutils/coreutils-5.0-2.aix5.1.ppc.rpm Installing this package should satisfy the requirement for fileutils, but tcsh should probably be rebuilt at some point to include updated requirements. Here is a link to the original announcement of the coreutils package: http://www-124.ibm.com/pipermail/aixtoolbox-list/2004-March/001727.html -- Philip K. Warren pk...@us... Phone: 512.838.8924 T/L 678.8924 aix...@ww... wrote on 11/22/2004 09:14:56 AM: > Hello, > > I am with AIX Supportline and I was assisting one of my customer installing > from the 5/2004 Linux toolbox cd. We were trying to install tcsh v6.11-2 > and it failed with a missing requirement of: > fileutils > > This was not available on the linux toolbox cd, or on the linux > toolbox download site. > I had to go back to the 10/2002 linux toolbox cd to find this. > > Is there are reason that the fileutils rpm is no longer provided? > And why would we still > provide tcsh and not provide the rpms needed to install it? Could > the fileutils rpm be put > back on the download site and in future versions of the linux toolbox cd? > > Regards, > Charles Simonson > AIX Support Delivery > cs...@us... > For more information regarding support: > http://techsupport.services.ibm.com/guides/handbook.html |
From: Charles S S. <cs...@us...> - 2004-11-22 18:15:05
|
Hello, I am with AIX Supportline and I was assisting one of my customer installing from the 5/2004 Linux toolbox cd. We were trying to install tcsh v6.11-2 and it failed with a missing requirement of: fileutils This was not available on the linux toolbox cd, or on the linux toolbox download site. I had to go back to the 10/2002 linux toolbox cd to find this. Is there are reason that the fileutils rpm is no longer provided? And why would we still provide tcsh and not provide the rpms needed to install it? Could the fileutils rpm be put back on the download site and in future versions of the linux toolbox cd? Regards, Charles Simonson AIX Support Delivery cs...@us... For more information regarding support: http://techsupport.services.ibm.com/guides/handbook.html |
From: Jurjen O. <ju...@st...> - 2004-11-18 22:24:20
|
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:08:44PM -0500, Aaron Morris wrote: > Toolbox on my boxes running 5.2 (ml3) boxes. screen consumes 100% of > CPU (~15% user/~85% sys). The same thing happens on 32 and 64bit Yup, that's a bug in the level of AIX you're using. See APAR IY55910 for a fix. (The fix is also in ML4). -- Jurjen Oskam "I often reflect that if "privileges" had been called "responsibilities" or "duties", I would have saved thousands of hours explaining to people why they were only gonna get them over my dead body." - Lee K. Gleason, VMS sysadmin |
From: Aaron M. <aar...@gm...> - 2004-11-18 03:08:51
|
Hello all, I have a problem running every version of screen available in the Toolbox on my boxes running 5.2 (ml3) boxes. screen consumes 100% of CPU (~15% user/~85% sys). The same thing happens on 32 and 64bit machines. The same package on my 5.1 boxes does not exhibit the same problem. Any ideas? |
From: David C. <cl...@au...> - 2004-11-10 23:48:24
|
Anders, I got hold of a recent 5.2 system with most of the bos filesets at 5.2.0.40 (bos.rte, bos.up, bos.rte.bind_cmds....) and on this I installed gcc and gcc-c++ at 3.3.2-4 plus binutils 2.14-3. I tried your exact testcase with a "g++ hello.cpp -o hello" and it worked. I then updated bos.rte.bind_cmds (which contains the ld and bind commands; bind is of course just a backend for ld). Again, it worked fine. One thing that I did discover is that you can't run g++ without libm.a on your system; I had to install "bos.adt.libm" for it to work. You could check that (though you probably have it; I don't think it would get as far as the link if you didn't). You could isolate the link command and try: $ g++ -c hello.cpp $ ld /lib/crt0.o /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libgcc.a hello.o -lc -o hello and see whether the latter still hangs. You could double-check the installation of your gcc-c++, at least to the extent that the libraries that are used by the linker are not somehow corrupted: $ sum /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libgcc.a 37072 2259 /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a 28690 144 /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libgcc.a Your bos.rte.bind_cmds is in "APPLIED" state, so you could "reject" it back to the previous level and see if the problem goes away: # installp -r bos.rte.bind_cmds (If it has no effect, you could install it up to 5.2.0.41 again; PTF U477473). I don't really have any other ideas. Since the link is hanging an AIX command ('bind'), and if nothing else works, you may want to contact AIX Support. (Of course G++ isn't supported, but ld/bind are.) Especially if it works after rejecting 5.2.0.41, since that would raise the implication that a change in that fileset unexpectedly introduced a bug. On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 12:55:11PM +0100, Hkansson Anders wrote: > This message didn´t reach the thread, sp I´m sending it again. I would be really grateul if someone had the time to help me with this! > > Hi, > > Thanks for Your reply. > > > What is your level of the bos.rte.bind_cmds fileset? > > I get the following output: > > : lslpp -l bos.rte.bind_cmds > Fileset Level State Description > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Path: /usr/lib/objrepos > bos.rte.bind_cmds 5.2.0.41 APPLIED Binder and Loader Commands > > > > You might try compiling your testcase like this: > > $ g++ hello.cpp -o hello -Wl,-bnoquiet > > I´m afraid it prints all the results when it´s done, even with the -noquiet option the binder hangs without error messages. > > Is thete anything else I can try? I´m at a loss here... > > /Anders > > > > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:50:51PM +0100, Håkansson Anders wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > > > > > I´m trying to get a working gcc on an AIX 5.2.0.0 ML4 running in 32bit > > mode. I´ve installed the following RPM:s : > > > > > > > > > > > > gcc-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm > > > > > > gcc-cplusplus-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm > > > > > > binutils-2.14-3.aix5.1.ppc.rpm > > > > > > > > > > > > To see if it works, I´m trying to compile a very simple program, > > hello.cpp: > > > > > > #include <iostream> > > > > > > using namespace std; > > > > > > int main(void) > > > > > > { > > > > > > cout << "Bwaah" << endl; > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > However when I try to compile it gcc, or rather ld hangs forever... : > > > > > > > > > Ps gives me: > > > > > > 42460 pts/1 0:00 /usr/bin/ld -bpT -bpD -btextro -bnodelcsect > > /lib/crt0.o /t > > > > > > 45670 pts/1 27:37 /usr/ccs/bin/bind64 quiet > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > /Anders > > > > > > > > -- > > David Clissold > > cl...@au... -- David Clissold cl...@au... |
From: <And...@ed...> - 2004-11-10 14:55:18
|
This message didn´t reach the thread, sp I´m sending it again. I would be really grateul if someone had the time to help me with this! Hi, Thanks for Your reply. > What is your level of the bos.rte.bind_cmds fileset? I get the following output: : lslpp -l bos.rte.bind_cmds Fileset Level State Description ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Path: /usr/lib/objrepos bos.rte.bind_cmds 5.2.0.41 APPLIED Binder and Loader Commands > You might try compiling your testcase like this: > $ g++ hello.cpp -o hello -Wl,-bnoquiet I´m afraid it prints all the results when it´s done, even with the -noquiet option the binder hangs without error messages. Is thete anything else I can try? I´m at a loss here... /Anders > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:50:51PM +0100, Håkansson Anders wrote: > > Hello! > > > > > > > > I´m trying to get a working gcc on an AIX 5.2.0.0 ML4 running in 32bit > mode. I´ve installed the following RPM:s : > > > > > > > > gcc-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm > > > > gcc-cplusplus-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm > > > > binutils-2.14-3.aix5.1.ppc.rpm > > > > > > > > To see if it works, I´m trying to compile a very simple program, > hello.cpp: > > > > > > > > #include <iostream> > > > > using namespace std; > > > > int main(void) > > > > { > > > > cout << "Bwaah" << endl; > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > However when I try to compile it gcc, or rather ld hangs forever... : > > > > > > > > Ps gives me: > > > > 42460 pts/1 0:00 /usr/bin/ld -bpT -bpD -btextro -bnodelcsect > /lib/crt0.o /t > > > > 45670 pts/1 27:37 /usr/ccs/bin/bind64 quiet > > > > > > > > So I tried to use gld instead: > > > > > > > > g++ hello.cpp > > > > /usr/bin/ld: /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm- > aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a(complex_io.o): reloc .data:0 not in csect > > > > /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a: > could not read symbols: Bad value > > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > > > > > Is there something I have missed? > > > > > > > > I would be really grateful if someone could help me with this!! > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > /Anders > > > > > > > > ======================================== > > > > Anders Håkansson > > Systemtekniker Unix > > Tel: + 46 8 58 88 7095 Mobil: +46 73 558 70 95 > > and...@ed... <BLOCKED::mailto:and...@ed...> > > > > EDB Drift AB > > Gustav III:s Boulevard 42 > > Box 720 > > 169 27 Solna > > www.edb.com <BLOCKED::http://www.edb.com/> > > > > EDB - När IT är affärskritiskt > > > > ======================================== > > > > > > > > -- > David Clissold > cl...@au... > _______________________________________________ > aixtoolbox-list mailing list > aix...@ww... > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list _______________________________________________ aixtoolbox-list mailing list aix...@ww... http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list |
From: David C. <cl...@au...> - 2004-11-10 02:38:41
|
The apache that you are running was built on a system with a libexpat.a that contains some different symbols than the libexpat.a found in the AIX Toolbox. Your apache is found in /usr/local/apache/bin, so it is not the apache from the Toolbox. You should try to see if you can get expat from the same place where you got your apache, since when they built it they must have had an expat with those symbols present. If you install their libexpat, you might need to deinstall the Toolbox one if that apache looks in /lib first, because it will find the Toolbox libexpat.a before their own, presumably in /usr/local/lib. Another option would be to install the Toolbox copy of apache, since that one works with the Toolbox libexpat.a. Or you might want to use the IBM HTTP Server (which is also apache), downloadable from: http://www-306.ibm.com/software/webservers/httpservers/ On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 06:06:57PM -0500, Swope Brian wrote: > > getting the following errors when trying to start apache for the first time > on an AIX 5.1 system with maintenance release 7 installed. > > exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd because of > the > > following errors: > > > 0509-130 Symbol resolution failed for httpd because: > > > 0509-136 Symbol _GLOBAL__FI_libexpat_so (number 158) is not > exported f > > rom > > > dependent module /usr/lib/libexpat.a(libexpat.so.0). > > > 0509-136 Symbol _GLOBAL__FD_libexpat_so (number 159) is not > exported f > > rom > > > dependent module /usr/lib/libexpat.a(libexpat.so.0). > > > 0509-192 Examine .loader section symbols with the > > > 'dump -Tv' command. > > > /etc/apachectl start: httpd could not be started > > > > I downloaded and installed the expat and expat-devel programs prior to > loading/starting apache. Seems to be something missing from the libexpat.a > file or I'm missing some other library file. > > > > Any ideas how I can resolve this? > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This message and any included attachments are from Siemens Medical Solutions > USA, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee(s). > The information contained herein may include trade secrets or privileged or > otherwise confidential information. Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, > copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may > be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe > you are not authorized to receive it, please promptly delete this message and > notify the sender by e-mail with a copy to Cen...@sh... > > Thank you -- David Clissold cl...@au... |
From: Swope B. <bri...@si...> - 2004-11-10 02:09:56
|
getting the following errors when trying to start apache for the first time on an AIX 5.1 system with maintenance release 7 installed. exec(): 0509-036 Cannot load program /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd because of the following errors: 0509-130 Symbol resolution failed for httpd because: 0509-136 Symbol _GLOBAL__FI_libexpat_so (number 158) is not exported f rom dependent module /usr/lib/libexpat.a(libexpat.so.0). 0509-136 Symbol _GLOBAL__FD_libexpat_so (number 159) is not exported f rom dependent module /usr/lib/libexpat.a(libexpat.so.0). 0509-192 Examine .loader section symbols with the 'dump -Tv' command. /etc/apachectl start: httpd could not be started I downloaded and installed the expat and expat-devel programs prior to loading/starting apache. Seems to be something missing from the libexpat.a file or I'm missing some other library file. Any ideas how I can resolve this? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message and any included attachments are from Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc. and are intended only for the addressee(s). The information contained herein may include trade secrets or privileged or otherwise confidential information. Unauthorized review, forwarding, printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you received this message in error, or have reason to believe you are not authorized to receive it, please promptly delete this message and notify the sender by e-mail with a copy to Cen...@sh... Thank you |
From: David C. <cl...@au...> - 2004-11-10 00:52:36
|
I asked about this and was told that you can't override it; it checks via an install script and if the script fails, then it will not install.... and if openssl is not actually "installed", the script will fail. At any rate, even if you could install it, it might not recognize your openssl. They compiled it using the AIX Toolbox copy of openssl, so it is going to look explicitly for libcrypto.a(libcrypto.so.0.9.7) in /usr/lib, /lib, and /opt/freeware/lib. Your archive might look different. You could just install the AIX Toolbox version of OpenSSL (in addition to your own), or you could build your own openssh as well and set it up to link directly to your own openssl. To get the Toolbox OpenSSL, go to: http:/www6.software.ibm.com/dl/aixtbx/aixtbx-p Or, if you want to do your own OpenSSH build, source is at openssh.org. On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:26:47AM -0600, Shortt, Kevin wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > I have AIX 5.2 with openssl manually installed and compiled. > I want to install openssh in installp format. When I do, the openssh.base > file complains about openssl not being installed at all. > > Is there a way to override the prereq check? > > > -k > _______________________________________________ > aixtoolbox-list mailing list > aix...@ww... > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list -- David Clissold cl...@au... |
From: Shortt, K. <KS...@az...> - 2004-11-09 20:27:02
|
Hi Everyone, I have AIX 5.2 with openssl manually installed and compiled. I want to install openssh in installp format. When I do, the openssh.base file complains about openssl not being installed at all. Is there a way to override the prereq check? -k |
From: Marc S. <ma...@au...> - 2004-11-09 20:13:54
|
db-3.3.11-3 > > Hi, > > I'm trying to install Python 2.2-4 on AIX 5.1 using the rpm obtained > from you "AIX Toolbox for Linux Applications" and I get a message: > > error: failed dependencies: > libdb.a(libdb-3.3.so.0) is needed by python-2.2-4 > > Can you please tell me which rpm package I need to install to meet > this library prereq? > > Thanks, > > K. Konrad Rillos > CAx Integration > > _______________________________________________ > aixtoolbox-list mailing list > aix...@ww... > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list > -- Marc Stephenson IBM Austin ma...@au... Notes: ma...@us... T/L 678-3189 |
From: Rillos, K. K <kon...@bo...> - 2004-11-09 18:55:28
|
Hi, I'm trying to install Python 2.2-4 on AIX 5.1 using the rpm obtained from you "AIX Toolbox for Linux Applications" and I get a message: error: failed dependencies: libdb.a(libdb-3.3.so.0) is needed by python-2.2-4 Can you please tell me which rpm package I need to install to meet this library prereq? Thanks, K. Konrad Rillos CAx Integration |
From: <And...@ed...> - 2004-11-05 16:37:53
|
Hi, Thanks for Your reply. > > Hi, > I tried your exact test on a 5.2.0 system, and it worked for me -- but I > am > not on ML4, so you probably have updated ld and bind binaries. > What is your level of the bos.rte.bind_cmds fileset? > That is, the output of "lslpp -l bos.rte.bind_cmds". > I get the following output: : lslpp -l bos.rte.bind_cmds Fileset Level State Description ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Path: /usr/lib/objrepos bos.rte.bind_cmds 5.2.0.41 APPLIED Binder and Loader Commands > You might try compiling your testcase like this: > $ g++ hello.cpp -o hello -Wl,-bnoquiet > and see how much output you get (assuming it prints results as it goes; if > it just prints it all when it's done than that might not help). > Since the process that appears to be hung is 'bind', this might give a > clue > about what it is doing just before it hangs. > I´m afraid it prints all the results when it´s done, even with the -noquiet option the binder hangs without error messages. Is thete anything else I can try? I´m at a loss here... /Anders > > On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:50:51PM +0100, Håkansson Anders wrote: > > Hello! > > > > > > > > I´m trying to get a working gcc on an AIX 5.2.0.0 ML4 running in 32bit > mode. I´ve installed the following RPM:s : > > > > > > > > gcc-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm > > > > gcc-cplusplus-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm > > > > binutils-2.14-3.aix5.1.ppc.rpm > > > > > > > > To see if it works, I´m trying to compile a very simple program, > hello.cpp: > > > > > > > > #include <iostream> > > > > using namespace std; > > > > int main(void) > > > > { > > > > cout << "Bwaah" << endl; > > > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > > > > > However when I try to compile it gcc, or rather ld hangs forever... : > > > > > > > > Ps gives me: > > > > 42460 pts/1 0:00 /usr/bin/ld -bpT -bpD -btextro -bnodelcsect > /lib/crt0.o /t > > > > 45670 pts/1 27:37 /usr/ccs/bin/bind64 quiet > > > > > > > > So I tried to use gld instead: > > > > > > > > g++ hello.cpp > > > > /usr/bin/ld: /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm- > aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a(complex_io.o): reloc .data:0 not in csect > > > > /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a: > could not read symbols: Bad value > > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > > > > > Is there something I have missed? > > > > > > > > I would be really grateful if someone could help me with this!! > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > /Anders > > > > > > > > ======================================== > > > > Anders Håkansson > > Systemtekniker Unix > > Tel: + 46 8 58 88 7095 Mobil: +46 73 558 70 95 > > and...@ed... <BLOCKED::mailto:and...@ed...> > > > > EDB Drift AB > > Gustav III:s Boulevard 42 > > Box 720 > > 169 27 Solna > > www.edb.com <BLOCKED::http://www.edb.com/> > > > > EDB - När IT är affärskritiskt > > > > ======================================== > > > > > > > > -- > David Clissold > cl...@au... > _______________________________________________ > aixtoolbox-list mailing list > aix...@ww... > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list |
From: David C. <cl...@au...> - 2004-11-04 21:06:50
|
Python 2.3.4 is pending approval of our legal group for distribution in the Toolbox, so my hope is that we will be permitted to update it at some point, but there is no target date. I haven't actually built 2.3.4 myself, but I have built 2.3.2 and don't expect that 2.3.4 should be much different. It might take a while, so you may prefer to download the source from python.org and compile your own copy if you need to use it reasonably soon. On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:44:28PM +0100, I.Gutheil wrote: > Is there a chance to find the new python version 2.3 or even 2.4 in the > AIX toolbox soon? > For the installation of the new PETSc release I need python > version 2.3 or later. > > Inge Gutheil > > ******************************************************************************** > Inge Gutheil, Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH, ZAM > 52425 Juelich > Phone: +49 2461 61-3135, FAX: +49 2461 61-6656, E-mail: > i.g...@fz... > ******************************************************************************** > > _______________________________________________ > aixtoolbox-list mailing list > aix...@ww... > http://www-124.ibm.com/developerworks/oss/mailman/listinfo/aixtoolbox-list -- David Clissold cl...@au... |
From: David C. <cl...@au...> - 2004-11-04 19:55:31
|
Hi, I tried your exact test on a 5.2.0 system, and it worked for me -- but I am not on ML4, so you probably have updated ld and bind binaries. What is your level of the bos.rte.bind_cmds fileset? That is, the output of "lslpp -l bos.rte.bind_cmds". You might try compiling your testcase like this: $ g++ hello.cpp -o hello -Wl,-bnoquiet and see how much output you get (assuming it prints results as it goes; if it just prints it all when it's done than that might not help). Since the process that appears to be hung is 'bind', this might give a clue about what it is doing just before it hangs. On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:50:51PM +0100, Håkansson Anders wrote: > Hello! > > > > I´m trying to get a working gcc on an AIX 5.2.0.0 ML4 running in 32bit mode. I´ve installed the following RPM:s : > > > > gcc-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm > > gcc-cplusplus-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm > > binutils-2.14-3.aix5.1.ppc.rpm > > > > To see if it works, I´m trying to compile a very simple program, hello.cpp: > > > > #include <iostream> > > using namespace std; > > int main(void) > > { > > cout << "Bwaah" << endl; > > return 0; > > } > > > > However when I try to compile it gcc, or rather ld hangs forever... : > > > > Ps gives me: > > 42460 pts/1 0:00 /usr/bin/ld -bpT -bpD -btextro -bnodelcsect /lib/crt0.o /t > > 45670 pts/1 27:37 /usr/ccs/bin/bind64 quiet > > > > So I tried to use gld instead: > > > > g++ hello.cpp > > /usr/bin/ld: /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a(complex_io.o): reloc .data:0 not in csect > > /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a: could not read symbols: Bad value > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > Is there something I have missed? > > > > I would be really grateful if someone could help me with this!! > > > > Regards > > /Anders > > > > ======================================== > > Anders Håkansson > Systemtekniker Unix > Tel: + 46 8 58 88 7095 Mobil: +46 73 558 70 95 > and...@ed... <BLOCKED::mailto:and...@ed...> > > EDB Drift AB > Gustav III:s Boulevard 42 > Box 720 > 169 27 Solna > www.edb.com <BLOCKED::http://www.edb.com/> > > EDB - När IT är affärskritiskt > > ======================================== > > > -- David Clissold cl...@au... |
From: <And...@ed...> - 2004-11-03 18:50:58
|
Hello! =20 I=B4m trying to get a working gcc on an AIX 5.2.0.0 ML4 running in 32bit = mode. I=B4ve installed the following RPM:s :=20 =20 gcc-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm gcc-cplusplus-3.3.2-4.aix5.2.ppc.rpm binutils-2.14-3.aix5.1.ppc.rpm =20 To see if it works, I=B4m trying to compile a very simple program, = hello.cpp: =20 #include <iostream> using namespace std; int main(void) { cout << "Bwaah" << endl; return 0; } =20 However when I try to compile it gcc, or rather ld hangs forever... : =20 Ps gives me: 42460 pts/1 0:00 /usr/bin/ld -bpT -bpD -btextro -bnodelcsect = /lib/crt0.o /t 45670 pts/1 27:37 /usr/ccs/bin/bind64 quiet =20 So I tried to use gld instead: =20 g++ hello.cpp /usr/bin/ld: = /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a(comple= x_io.o): reloc .data:0 not in csect /opt/freeware/lib/gcc-lib/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/3.3.2/libstdc++.a: = could not read symbols: Bad value collect2: ld returned 1 exit status =20 Is there something I have missed?=20 =20 I would be really grateful if someone could help me with this!! =20 Regards /Anders =20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Anders H=E5kansson=20 Systemtekniker Unix=20 Tel: + 46 8 58 88 7095 Mobil: +46 73 558 70 95 and...@ed... <BLOCKED::mailto:and...@ed...>=20 EDB Drift AB Gustav III:s Boulevard 42 Box 720 169 27 Solna www.edb.com <BLOCKED::http://www.edb.com/>=20 EDB - N=E4r IT =E4r aff=E4rskritiskt=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =20 |