Re: [WDB-Development] WCI Interface

[Jan I. P. <ja...@me...>]

Then I think you should go ahead and implement the changes as suggested.

-JI


ti., 14.10.2008 kl. 14.59 +0200, skrev Michael Omotayo Akinde:
> The change won't add any new vulnerabilities that do not already
> exist. Strings are already being used for most of the other dimensions
> in WCI.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Michael A.
> 
> Jan Ivar Pladsen wrote: 
> > ma., 13.10.2008 kl. 10.42 +0200, skrev Michael Akinde:
> > 
> >   
> > > The only risks that I can see are the usual: adding new bugs, being 
> > > unable to complete the changes on time, etc. In general, using a string 
> > > specification makes for a much more flexible solution to the 
> > > specification problem which reduces the likelihood of needing to do 
> > > future costly changes to the interface.
> > >     
> > 
> > Any reason to be worried about adding security related bugs via needed
> > string processing routines? buffer overflow, indexing, etc?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
> > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
> > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
> > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wdb-development mailing list
> > Wdb...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wdb-development
> >   
>