Re: [UFRaw-Devel] Capture One Processing

[Jeff H. <jh...@co...>]

Thanks for your sensible reply. This is a solid general point to raise; however, I am curious how true it is in this exact case?  Perhaps it is a tall hill, but one that could be climbed?  We are open to funding such an effort. 

-J



On Apr 20, 2011, at 11:50 PM, Pascal de Bruijn <pmj...@pc...> wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:30 AM, Jeff Harmon <jh...@co...> wrote:
>>  Hi folks,
>> 
>>  Thanks so much for all the effort!  We use ufraw as part of the open
>>  source DAM ResourceSpace, and it is exemplary.  Big kudos!
>> 
>>  I have a quick question and am hoping my naivete isn't an irritant:  I
>>  believe the Capture One 6.1 uses .cos (or sometimes .cos.newer) files to
>>  apply adjustments to the raw captures upon processing.  Can ufraw/dcraw
>>  use these settings at all to inform its process?
>> 
>>  If so, pointing me to where I might uncover such functionality would be
>>  greatly appreciated. If not, is this an effort that might be funded?
>>  The .cos/.cos.newer file is eminently readable/parseable XML.
> 
> Exchanging "settings" between advanced imaging processing packages is
> often extremely difficult or impossible, simply because they all work
> differently (internally).
> 
> Regards,
> Pascal de Bruijn
>