From: Simon K. <si...@ne...> - 2010-01-24 10:20:37
|
Hello! I was hoping to use --size rather than calculating my own --shrink since it does everything for me :) , but I noticed that with 20D images of raw resolution 3522 x 2348, --size 880 actually emits 879 pixels and --size 881 actually emits 881 pixels. D'oh! If I hack ufraw_calculate_scale to return a lower scale factor, it works. The problem seems to be that 3522 can't evenly divide by four, so the rest of the calculations end up outputting 879 x 586 in this case, which would be fine except that it ends up actually shrinking to 880 and then resampling to 879, which makes the resulting image very soft. --shrink 4 works and looks just fine, emitting 880 x 587. I'm not entirely sure how this should be fixed... For reference, if this sensor size is "odd", some examples can be fetched from http://0x.ca/sim/tmp/cr2/ (img_2425.cr2 is a fun one with lots of nasty colour artifacts from shrink values > 1). :) Cheers, Simon- |