From: Greg T. <gd...@ir...> - 2008-12-20 02:05:19
|
> I would like to get feedback, mostly from none-gcc users (Solaris and > some BSD probably) about today's change. I'm starting to use variable > length arrays. It is part of the C99 specification, but for some > forgotten reason I avoided using it until now. On NetBSD/i386 part way to the impending 5.0 from 4.0, with gcc 4.1.3, I just updated to the latest CVS and rebuilt. I get a few warnings, but basically repeated: In file included from /usr/pkg/include/jpeglib.h:24, from dcraw.cc:41: /usr/pkg/include/jconfig.h:12:1: warning: "HAVE_STDLIB_H" redefined In file included from dcraw.cc:19: config.h:86:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition /usr/pkg/include/lcms.h: In function 'void* _cmsMalloc(size_t)': /usr/pkg/include/lcms.h:1410: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false I was able to run the resulting ufraw and convert an image with no apparent problems. FWIW, I think it's ok to require C99. |