From: Robert K. <rl...@al...> - 2008-05-29 23:48:44
|
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 02:35:15 +0400 From: Andrew Zabolotny <za...@ho...> I just subscribed to this list, since I did not know of its existence :) I'll try to answer to most questions which were asked here regarding my lensfun patch. Hubert Figuiere: >So you relicensed UFRaw under GPLv3? I already told this to Udi, but I'll repeat. a) I never heard that GPLv2 apps cannot be linked against LGPLv3 libs. b) If this turns to be true, I'll add a special clause to lensfun license explicitly allowing to link lensfun with GPLv2 applications. It's not just a UFRaw question, other apps willing to integrate lensfun may hit this problem too (if it exists). I asked the FSF precisely this, and they confirmed that this combination isn't compatible (surprised me, too). Apparently something in LGPL3 adds something that would be considered an extra restriction to GPL2. However, I'm still waiting for an answer about exactly what it is that's incompatible. There's no problem for GPL2+ apps using LGPL3 libraries -- it's only GPL2 (only) apps that have this problem. You may want to ask the FSF (lic...@fs...) whether your proposed solution would work. -- Robert Krawitz <rl...@al...> Tall Clubs International -- http://www.tall.org/ or 1-888-IM-TALL-2 Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lp...@uu... Project lead for Gutenprint -- http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net "Linux doesn't dictate how I work, I dictate how Linux works." --Eric Crampton |