tuxpaint-stamps Mailing List for Tux Paint (Page 2)
An award-winning drawing program for children of all ages
Brought to you by:
wkendrick
You can subscribe to this list here.
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(18) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
(15) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
|
Dec
(13) |
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(7) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2024 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Karl O. H. <ka...@hu...> - 2014-06-29 11:15:13
|
Pere Pujal i Carabantes skreiv: >> OK. I’ve now done another run, where I don’t clean any fully transparent >> pixels. The savings are now 1.6 MiB (1.1 MiB for stamps and 0.5 MiB for >> Tux Paint itself). OK to commit? > > I can't see anything to opose, if my advice counts I would say go ahead > and commit :) OK. I’ve now commited the optimised PNG files. For the record, here’s the commands I used: find . -name '*.png' | while read fil do echo $fil wine /path-to-truepng/TruePNG.exe /zc9 /zm1-9 /zs0-3 /fe /na /i0 \ $fil >/dev/null 2>/dev/null wine /path-to-truepng/PNGZopfli.exe $fil 50 >/dev/null 2>/dev/null mv ${fil%.png}.zopfli.png $fil >/dev/null done I used TruePNG v0.4.2.1 and PNGZopfli v1.2. -- Karl Ove Hufthammer E-mail: ka...@hu... Jabber: hu...@ja... |
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2014-03-20 07:47:01
|
Pere mentioned that he couldn't commit changes into some directories within tuxpaint-stamps CVS repository, so I used the adminrepo tool at SourceForge.net to try and unlock it. Hopefully it helped! === -bash-3.2$ adminrepo --unlock cvs Unlock old locks in the cvs repository for tuxpaint? [ny] y Requesting that old locks be removed from the cvs repo for tuxpaint. The tuxpaint repo copy has been unlocked. === -- -bill! Sent from my computer |
From: Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...> - 2013-12-10 22:09:23
|
El dt 10 de 12 de 2013 a les 10:07 +0200, en/na Alexandros Bousoulegkas va escriure: > Hello everybody, > > > I have installed the 0.9.21c - 2010-12-24 version for Windows XP, but > stamps are missing, actually there are just very few available. How > could I download the rest of them? Maybe you missed the stamps package? http://sourceforge.net/projects/tuxpaint/files/tuxpaint-stamps/2009.06.28/tuxpaint-stamps-2009-06-28-win32-installer.exe/download > Thank you in advance, > Alex > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT > organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance > affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your > Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ Tuxpaint-stamps mailing list Tux...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-stamps |
From: Alexandros B. <ale...@gm...> - 2013-12-10 08:07:41
|
Hello everybody, I have installed the 0.9.21c - 2010-12-24 version for Windows XP, but stamps are missing, actually there are just very few available. How could I download the rest of them? Thank you in advance, Alex |
From: bb <hel...@be...> - 2013-08-18 20:38:35
|
I have so many homemade stamps that it is imposable to check. If there is a white background square it just means that the stamp was not masked properly. No big deal. bb On 8/18/2013 7:44 AM, Pere Pujal i Carabantes wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that some rockets shows a white background in my box. > Only happens to me or is a wide problem? > Could somebody check them? > Thanks > Pere > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite! > It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production. > Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. > Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > _______________________________________________ > Tuxpaint-stamps mailing list > Tux...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-stamps > |
From: Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...> - 2013-08-18 11:25:00
|
Hi, I've noticed that some rockets shows a white background in my box. Only happens to me or is a wide problem? Could somebody check them? Thanks Pere |
From: Albert C. <aca...@gm...> - 2013-03-18 15:13:40
|
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 3:59 PM, Karl Ove Hufthammer <ka...@hu...> wrote: > la. den 16. 03. 2013 klokka 20.16 (+0100) skreiv Pere Pujal i > Carabantes: >> If the transparent part of the images is not afected(not blanqued out >> to white or black), then it is OK for me too. >> A couple of files with worked transparent stuff that should not be >> lost are the two fireman*png in the people directory, there are >> others. > > The transparency part is not affected, in that each pixel will still be > rendered identically. However, the procedure *does* clean the RGB part > of *fully* transparent pixels. I don’t think will be a problem. (For the > fireman images, these pixels only contain garbage.) Nope, that is not garbage. The stuff around the edge of the fireman was carefully painted to minimize edge effects that occur when a stamp is scaled. Scaling causes the content of fully transparent pixels to bleed into the image. By painting the transparent pixels to match the edge of the object, this problem goes away. Edges of objects need to be painted anyway, to eliminate the background halo at 1:1 size, so you might as well paint the background out while you're at it. Getting rid of the background will fix halo problems at scaled sizes. Imagine a JPEG picture of a socket wrench on a green table. There will be bits of greenness on the wrench. You need to zoom in and paint that away. If you don't do this, then there will be a green edge when a Tux Paint user places the socket wrench on a non-green canvas. If you fix that, but don't paint the background, scaling the image to small sizes will bring back the halo. |
From: Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...> - 2013-03-17 16:57:21
|
El dg 17 de 03 de 2013 a les 11:10 +0100, en/na Karl Ove Hufthammer va escriure: > la. den 16. 03. 2013 klokka 22.13 (+0100) skreiv Pere Pujal i > Carabantes: > > > The transparency part is not affected, in that each pixel will still > > be > > > rendered identically. However, the procedure *does* clean the RGB > > part > > > of *fully* transparent pixels. I don’t think will be a problem. (For > > the > > > fireman images, these pixels only contain garbage.) > > > > Seems that this garbage is useful when scaling in order to keep the > > right colors at the edge of the stamp. See how the transparent pixels > > near the brown shoes are painted in brown, same for the other parts of > > the edge of the stamp. > > Albert explained this in the advanced stamps howto, at the section > > "Replace the fringe and junk pixels:" > > OK. I’ve now done another run, where I don’t clean any fully transparent > pixels. The savings are now 1.6 MiB (1.1 MiB for stamps and 0.5 MiB for > Tux Paint itself). OK to commit? > I can't see anything to opose, if my advice counts I would say go ahead and commit :) Thanks Pere |
From: Karl O. H. <ka...@hu...> - 2013-03-17 10:10:28
|
la. den 16. 03. 2013 klokka 22.13 (+0100) skreiv Pere Pujal i Carabantes: > > The transparency part is not affected, in that each pixel will still > be > > rendered identically. However, the procedure *does* clean the RGB > part > > of *fully* transparent pixels. I don’t think will be a problem. (For > the > > fireman images, these pixels only contain garbage.) > > Seems that this garbage is useful when scaling in order to keep the > right colors at the edge of the stamp. See how the transparent pixels > near the brown shoes are painted in brown, same for the other parts of > the edge of the stamp. > Albert explained this in the advanced stamps howto, at the section > "Replace the fringe and junk pixels:" OK. I’ve now done another run, where I don’t clean any fully transparent pixels. The savings are now 1.6 MiB (1.1 MiB for stamps and 0.5 MiB for Tux Paint itself). OK to commit? -- Karl Ove Hufthammer http://huftis.org/ Jabber: ka...@hu... |
From: Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...> - 2013-03-16 21:00:55
|
El ds 16 de 03 de 2013 a les 20:59 +0100, en/na Karl Ove Hufthammer va escriure: > la. den 16. 03. 2013 klokka 20.16 (+0100) skreiv Pere Pujal i > Carabantes: > > > I think this is a worthwhile saving, and recommend using the > > > optimised PNG files. I have commit access to the CVS repository, so > > > if I get the go-ahead, I can commit the files. > > > > > > > If the transparent part of the images is not afected(not blanqued out > > to white or black), then it is OK for me too. > > A couple of files with worked transparent stuff that should not be > > lost are the two fireman*png in the people directory, there are > > others. > > The transparency part is not affected, in that each pixel will still be > rendered identically. However, the procedure *does* clean the RGB part > of *fully* transparent pixels. I don’t think will be a problem. (For the > fireman images, these pixels only contain garbage.) Seems that this garbage is useful when scaling in order to keep the right colors at the edge of the stamp. See how the transparent pixels near the brown shoes are painted in brown, same for the other parts of the edge of the stamp. Albert explained this in the advanced stamps howto, at the section "Replace the fringe and junk pixels:" Pere |
From: Karl O. H. <ka...@hu...> - 2013-03-16 19:59:35
|
la. den 16. 03. 2013 klokka 20.16 (+0100) skreiv Pere Pujal i Carabantes: > > I think this is a worthwhile saving, and recommend using the > > optimised PNG files. I have commit access to the CVS repository, so > > if I get the go-ahead, I can commit the files. > > > > If the transparent part of the images is not afected(not blanqued out > to white or black), then it is OK for me too. > A couple of files with worked transparent stuff that should not be > lost are the two fireman*png in the people directory, there are > others. The transparency part is not affected, in that each pixel will still be rendered identically. However, the procedure *does* clean the RGB part of *fully* transparent pixels. I don’t think will be a problem. (For the fireman images, these pixels only contain garbage.) One can actually obtain even better compression ratios by optimising the RGB content of fully transparent pixels, but I chose not to do this. -- Karl Ove Hufthammer http://huftis.org/ Jabber: ka...@hu... |
From: Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...> - 2013-03-16 19:04:07
|
El ds 16 de 03 de 2013 a les 13:47 +0100, en/na Karl Ove Hufthammer va escriure: > Google has recently released their new Deflate-compatible compressor, > Zopfli: > http://googledevelopers.blogspot.no/2013/02/compress-data-more-densely-with-zopfli.html > > This can also be used to reduce the size of PNG files (losslessly). > I have done some tests on all the PNG files in Tux Paint, and running > TruePNG followed by PNGZopfli, the size of the files stamp and other > files was reduced by ~2.6 MiB (some of this came from TruePNG and some > from Zopfli compression). > > I think this is a worthwhile saving, and recommend using the > optimised PNG files. I have commit access to the CVS repository, so > if I get the go-ahead, I can commit the files. > If the transparent part of the images is not afected(not blanqued out to white or black), then it is OK for me too. A couple of files with worked transparent stuff that should not be lost are the two fireman*png in the people directory, there are others. HTH Pere |
From: Karl O. H. <ka...@hu...> - 2013-03-16 12:47:10
|
Google has recently released their new Deflate-compatible compressor, Zopfli: http://googledevelopers.blogspot.no/2013/02/compress-data-more-densely-with-zopfli.html This can also be used to reduce the size of PNG files (losslessly). I have done some tests on all the PNG files in Tux Paint, and running TruePNG followed by PNGZopfli, the size of the files stamp and other files was reduced by ~2.6 MiB (some of this came from TruePNG and some from Zopfli compression). I think this is a worthwhile saving, and recommend using the optimised PNG files. I have commit access to the CVS repository, so if I get the go-ahead, I can commit the files. -- Karl Ove Hufthammer http://huftis.org/ Jabber: ka...@hu... |
From: bb <hel...@be...> - 2012-08-07 00:32:06
|
Teresa, Your computer in infected and is in need of repair. On 8/6/2012 6:37 AM, Teresa wrote: > HI! http://roy99.kx.cz/asvvvxxx.php?tyCID=o1ilx > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > _______________________________________________ > Tuxpaint-stamps mailing list > Tux...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-stamps > |
From: Teresa <pho...@ya...> - 2012-08-06 10:37:50
|
HI! http://roy99.kx.cz/asvvvxxx.php?tyCID=o1ilx |
From: Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...> - 2012-01-13 08:55:34
|
El dv 13 de 01 de 2012 a les 06:10 +0000, en/na Caroline Ford va escriure: > Hmm. > > Of the first two I've listened to - one has one word mispronounced and I would remove the mispronounced ones if I knew how they should be pronounced ;) so I have to relay on somebody being native speaker. > they both sound like they were recorded by a non-native speaker of > English. Yep, we knew this in advance, he provided a sample record and it was approved... > > My instincts are that they aren't good enough but I wouldn't like to > make the final call. > :( too many work to end in nothing Thanks Pere |
From: Caroline F. <car...@gm...> - 2012-01-13 06:10:20
|
Hmm. Of the first two I've listened to - one has one word mispronounced and they both sound like they were recorded by a non-native speaker of English. My instincts are that they aren't good enough but I wouldn't like to make the final call. Caroline On 11 January 2012 21:21, Pere Pujal i Carabantes <per...@gm...>wrote: > Hi all! > > As a task in GCI, a Indian student has recorded the English descriptive > sounds for stamps. > Can somebody speaking English review those and say what of the records > can be keeped and what of them should be discarded? I am not english > speaker, so I can not trust them. > > You can get all the records (18 MB) at > > http://hornol.no-ip.org/linux/tuxpaint/stamps/tuxpaint-stamps-english-descs.tar.bz2 > or browse inline starting at > http://hornol.no-ip.org/linux/tuxpaint/stamps/stamps > > We have too the Spanish (by a student native of Puerto Rico) recordings, > which I am going to review and upload as main Spanish if nobody asks > against it :) > > BTW, If any of you wants to create the descriptions for your language, > you are welcome to do it :) I can provide guidance if needed. > > Thanks > Pere > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a complex > infrastructure or vast IT resources to deliver seamless, secure access to > virtual desktops. With this all-in-one solution, easily deploy virtual > desktops for less than the cost of PCs and save 60% on VDI infrastructure > costs. Try it free! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Citrix-VDIinabox > _______________________________________________ > Tuxpaint-stamps mailing list > Tux...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-stamps > |
From: Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...> - 2012-01-11 21:21:56
|
Hi all! As a task in GCI, a Indian student has recorded the English descriptive sounds for stamps. Can somebody speaking English review those and say what of the records can be keeped and what of them should be discarded? I am not english speaker, so I can not trust them. You can get all the records (18 MB) at http://hornol.no-ip.org/linux/tuxpaint/stamps/tuxpaint-stamps-english-descs.tar.bz2 or browse inline starting at http://hornol.no-ip.org/linux/tuxpaint/stamps/stamps We have too the Spanish (by a student native of Puerto Rico) recordings, which I am going to review and upload as main Spanish if nobody asks against it :) BTW, If any of you wants to create the descriptions for your language, you are welcome to do it :) I can provide guidance if needed. Thanks Pere |
From: Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...> - 2011-11-30 06:50:49
|
Hi all! As a task of GCI, a student (nick finaiized) has reviewed the file TODO.txt and noted what images we have yet added, Would be nice if somebody reviews the file and cleanups it, keeping the themes we want still more images and deleting those for that we have enough images. Thanks Pere |
From: Dawn G. <Daw...@ws...> - 2011-10-29 19:10:08
|
I have about 60 kindergarten, first and second grade students who would be beta testers for you. DEG Sent from FirstClass with my iPhone Tux Paint Rubber Stamps artwork discussion <tux...@li...> writes: >Some of the new features aren't quite complete enough, IMO. Plus, it >needs lots & lots of testing. :D -bill! - > >I for one am willing to beta test it. > >bb > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >Get your Android app more play: Bring it to the BlackBerry PlayBook >in minutes. BlackBerry App World™ now supports Android™ Apps >for the BlackBerry® PlayBook™. Discover just how easy and simple >it is! http://p.sf.net/sfu/android-dev2dev >_______________________________________________ >Tuxpaint-stamps mailing list >Tux...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tuxpaint-stamps > |
From: bb <hel...@be...> - 2011-10-29 17:42:54
|
Some of the new features aren't quite complete enough, IMO. Plus, it needs lots & lots of testing. :D -bill! - I for one am willing to beta test it. bb |
From: Bill K. <nb...@so...> - 2011-10-29 17:24:01
|
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 09:31:16PM +0200, Pere Pujal i Carabantes wrote: > Hi all! > > It's OK for me to release, but please, when you are decided to release, > announce it too in the i18n mail list, and give the translators a week > or 2 to update the translations. Yes, of course. > BTW, What is stopping a release of Tuxpaint? Some of the new features aren't quite complete enough, IMO. Plus, it needs lots & lots of testing. :D -bill! |
From: Pere P. i C. <per...@gm...> - 2011-10-18 19:31:29
|
Hi all! It's OK for me to release, but please, when you are decided to release, announce it too in the i18n mail list, and give the translators a week or 2 to update the translations. BTW, What is stopping a release of Tuxpaint? Pere |
From: bb <hel...@be...> - 2011-10-11 21:07:26
|
Steve, Not being a graphics guy I could not make heads or tails of this process . I spent 2 hours a few year ago trying it. The Paint.Net program way is quick and the steps are few and easy to follow. I am sure the output stamp is not the quality of your method but anybody (even me) can do it. Bryant On 10/11/2011 4:22 PM, Steve Karg wrote: > Hi Teresa, > >> I would like to write up an article on creating stamps for Tuxpaint, but >> haven't seen any information and I don't know how. > There is a document in the TuxPaint version control system, but it may > be out of date with how many of us create stamps today: > http://tuxpaint.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/tuxpaint/tuxpaint/docs/ADVANCED-STAMPS-HOWTO.txt > > I normally use GIMP for converting JPG photos of objects to PNG. If I > can, I try to create an SVG image from a photo of an object, or just > create an SVG from scratch using Inkscape. The SVG is preferred since > it scales nicely. > > Good luck! > > Steve |
From: bb <hel...@be...> - 2011-10-11 20:54:48
|
My wife and I have made hundreds for our 6 year old Grandson, many from movies that he likes. 1. Download the program Paint.net It is free. 2. Convert picture that you want stamp from to .png format. 3. Pick magic wand from tools pull down menu. 4. Set tolerance level to between 17-27 percent (on tool bar above picture). 5. Click magic wand somewhere in area you want gone. 6. Use scissors tool click out area you want gone and light checkerboard pattern will be left behind. 7. Remove left behind junk with sizable erasure tool. 8. Name and save picture into tux paint stamp folder of choice. Bryant |