From: joel de g. <dj...@gm...> - 2002-01-25 04:30:03
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gustavo Guerra" > > I sure wish this is something that is tackled by the boost people. > > People really need this facility a lot. I wish some people will work > > on a cross-platform dynamic-binding library rather than some pathetic > > command line parser! > > > > The 'boost people' is everybody that wants to contribute. So, if you want > something on boost, just propose them to do it, and see if you can get any > help (and vice-versa). Boost is volunter driven, remember? Anyway, I think > there's something like that in development. See > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/shared_object.zip > > And a command line parser can be *very* useful. So, why don't we just make a > concrete proposal based on spirit and submit it, instead of trying to > convice people that already maked their mind not to, to do it? Let's > surprise the sceptic people from there :) > > BTW, hope spirit gets into boost ASAP (maybe after 1.4?) Sorry for sounding rude. It's not my usual nature, believe me.. ;) Well, I'm surely mistaken in this regard. Why would I pass such a sweeping statement, I don't know a thing about command lines anyway, coming from a Macintosh background. Sorry... That said, I am not an authority on command lines so I welcome anyone who might want to tackle this. I (we) will give full support to anyone interested, including, but not limited to framework support for things such as partial-keyword-matching. Experience in this area will definitely be beneficial to many. Regards, --Joel PS> So that's what shared_object is all about? Misleading name IMO. Sorry too, I've not been following boost messages closely. |