From: Ben S. <pow...@16...> - 2015-06-21 11:34:39
|
why not a new bug? -- 发自我的网易邮箱手机智能版 在 2015-06-21 16:41:20,"Philipp Klaus Krause" <pk...@sp...> 写道: >On 20.06.2015 22:29, Maarten Brock wrote: >> Hello SDCC friends, >> >> The second Release Candidate for SDCC 3.5.0 has just been put online. >> >> For RC1 there was no test result from anyone, neither positive nor >> negative. I wonder if that means it was pretty OK, nobody tested, nobody >> noticed or even nobody cared. Still I ask again: >> >> If you have the time, please verify it and report back with the positive >> or negative results. >> >> May the Source be with you, >> Maarten Brock >> > >On my x86-64 Debian GNU/Linux testing system, I did a clean checkout of >current svn, build, installed, uninstalled sdcc and ran the regression >tests. >Most was ok. I filed bug #2390 for an uninstall issue. >There are two new pic16 regression tests failing (bug-2059, >gcc-torture-execute-pr39240), and I get a huge number of warnings in the >pic16 regression tests, that AFAIR were not there before (I opened >support request #93 for that). > >Philipp > > > |