Re: [sdcc-devel] Fixing a peephole bug before the release

[Borut R. <bor...@gm...>]

It's OK with me.

Actually I already added support for pics 16f882, 16f883, 16f884 (patch
from Karoly Molnar) without asking for agreement since I see it as no risk
for other targets and lo risk for existing pic14 MPUs.

Borut

On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Philipp Klaus Krause <pk...@sp...> wrote:

> While working on the smallopts branch I notived that peephole 15 for
> z80, z180, r2k and r3ka is broken and can result in wrong code when %5
> is the same as %7.
> I would like to fix this by adding the check for notSame(%7 %5). Since
> this add just another condition to a peephole this fix is unlikely to
> introduce another bug. It only affects the z80, z180, r2k and r3ka ports.
> Is it okay to fix this now?
>
> Philipp
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> sdcc-devel mailing list
> sdc...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel
>