From: Jesus Calvino-F. <Je...@ec...> - 2010-01-14 03:05:29
|
Hi Borut, Can you explain why sdcc specific keywords need to be deprecated? I believe this will create a whole bunch of compatibility issues. Jesus At 11:31 AM 13/01/2010, you wrote: >Hello sdcc users and developers, > >here is a list of tasks which by my opinion are candidates for the sdcc >3.0 release: > > * sdas merge with asxxxx 5.0 > * change sdcc libraries license to GPL+LE > * review and merge "SDCC inline support and fixes" enhancements by > Pavel Pisa > see > >http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100599&aid=1767885&group_id=599 > * review and merge support for cs08 target by Gary Osborn > * deprecate warnings for sdcc specific keywords, not preceded with > two underlines (data, code, idata, xdata, ...) and announce in the > documentation that they will be removed in the future > * remove unsupported and broken targets xa51, avr > * review & merge patches in the bug tracker > * bug fixing > * ... > >The list is quite long and you probably have additional candidates. > >I propose to make a list of candidates on sdcc wiki, prioritize them and >find the persons which will work on them. There are many tasks that can >be done by non "core" sdcc developers: change sdcc libraries license, >changes, review and reorganization of the documentation, ... > >So if there is anybody willing to help us, let us know! > >Borut > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community >Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support >A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy >Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers >http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev >_______________________________________________ >sdcc-devel mailing list >sdc...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sdcc-devel |