From: Pavel P. <pi...@cm...> - 2009-12-20 12:50:06
|
On Tuesday 01 December 2009 21:40:47 Maarten Brock wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > I'm sorry I don't have the time to look deeper into your > patches right now. I do welcome them though. And as long > as they are in the tracker they will not be forgotten, > esp. if they solve bugs and the patch is mentioned in > the bug item. My main concern with SDCC is still fixing > as many bugs when I find the time. > > Thanks for your patience (I hope) > Maarten Brock Hello Maarten, all patches are in well formed state (at least according to my linux kernel contributions experience) in the tracker related to the bug http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=100599&aid=1767885&group_id=599 I can copy them to patches/features tracker, but I think, that duplication can cause only problem with finding latest version and related comments. There are some basic tests but I there could be written more tests for additional fixed bugs by spending time on simplification of complex TinyOS tests. The copy of patched SDCC sources is there http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~pisa/mcs51/sdcc-2.9.5-091218-pi1.tar.gz I hope, that you will found time to review my effort and help integration of the bug fixes and enhancements. We have to have keep macros burden in our uLan.sf.net code even after project rearrangement and managed it to compile with mainline version of SDCC because we do not want to use features for which there is no guarantee, that will be supported in future. But I feel quite unhappy about that. So I hope that that integration of these quite needed fixes would not drop from your queue. Best wishes, Pavel Pisa e-mail: pi...@cm... www: http://cmp.felk.cvut.cz/~pisa university: http://dce.felk.cvut.cz/ company: http://www.pikron.com/ |