From: Maarten B. <sou...@ds...> - 2007-10-24 08:20:42
|
Jan, > I did not want to post this as a bug, as I am not sure whether this is > not just me... :-) IMHO it's no bug. The code performs what it's supposed to do. But you may classify this as a Request For Enhancement. Maybe it even already is. > Isn't at least some of the following supposed to be optimised into a > djnz? Only the last one did, although it seems to me that some of the > others could be managed similarly... Btw. I see DJNZ twice ;-) But you may recompile this with -fverbose-asm to also view the iCodes and the used peephole rules. These can point to places where optimizations can be extended. Greets, Maarten |