RE: [sdcc-devel] tmpnam and tempnam

[Borut R. <bor...@si...>]

>The disadvantage is, that there's no "fall back" solution, if something
goes
>wrong. And it needs to be thoroughly tested before a commit.
>But I also see the advantage mentioned by you: things are simpler. And
that's
>why I say yes.

I have an idea: I'll first commit the solution with temporary file, and
after that
the solution with pipe. We will have both in CVS, so we can decide to revert
to temporary file solution if there will be troubles with the pipe.

And now a call for help: currently I don't have a Linux machine to test the
changes.
I'll test them on Win2k with Borland C++, MSVC and CygWin. CygWin should be
close
enough to Linux, but to be on the safe side: is there anybody willing to
test the
code on Linux before I commit it to CVS?

Borut