Re: [Sdcc-user] Bug in 15 June snapshot.

[Bernhard H. <ber...@be...>]

> > > Shouldnt ~P1_0 behave same in both contexts?
> >
> > No.
>
> I disagree. ISO/IEC 9899 states that the "result of the ~ operator is the
> bitwise complement of its (promoted) operand". So P1_0 should be promoted
> before applying the complement operator regardless of how the expression
> is used (or at least resolve to the same result as if it were promoted).
My focus was on the difference between ~ and !, and they are not the same; 
sorry, I wasn't specific enough and you're of course right.
~ should behave the same in func1() and func2() from the bug report.

Bernhard