Re: [Scid-users] Best way to get bugs fixed? (was ... 16.7mio game limit.)

[Chris B. <cba...@sl...>]

Am I right with my reasoning? ... below ...

On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 03:37:56PM +0100, stephen williamson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 02:04:29PM +0100, stephen williamson wrote:
> > Actually I think there was quite a lot of interest a couple of months
> > ago. Many people offered to contribute (myself included) who had had
> > no involvement in the project before. One guy, Joao I think, offered
> > to project manage, but it looks like that has all disappeared down a
> > black hole.
> 
> "So you have a patch that fixes the game limit?"
> 
> My point was about your comment about votes not counting for anything.

Random voting on a mailing list is not the way to get features added, or
bugs fixed. An actual bug should be lodged, (wishlist or otherwise) 
(preferably with a patch). If a bug is logged then at least it is
documented and can be "kept an eye on", otherwise it is likely to be
lost amongst all the ML messages.

> However, your discourteous reply proves my point adequately.

Discourteous? Really? I was trying to keep the thread on topic with the
subject, you can change the subject creating a subthread, if necessary.

-- 
"If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people
who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the 
oppressing." --- Malcolm X