From: Thomas L. <ta...@gm...> - 2008-08-05 20:24:24
|
2008/7/26 Stephen Watson <st...@ke...>: > "Thomas Leonard" <ta...@gm...> wrote: >> 2008/7/25 Full Mitten <ful...@ly...>: [...] >> > I don't see an executable 'rox'. Has this changed (I've been out of the >> > loop for a while)? ROX-Filer runs if I execute 'AppRun'. >> >> Thanks, that's really useful! >> >> The rox executable isn't installed anymore. The idea is that the >> packaging system handles that (after all, none of the other ROX apps >> has an install script). I'll have to think about how best to support >> that on Windows... > > It's also needed when installing from source. I've put in a menu option > from the New menu, but it might make more sense to put it in the Options. That's... really ugly ;-) There must be a clean way of doing this. i.e. an install method that will work with all applications, not just ROX-Filer. Shouldn't it add something to the Start menu on Windows too? 0alias doesn't work, unfortunately, as some code in Zero Install uses os.fork(), which Python on Windows doesn't seem to support. I should change them into calls to subprocess or threading sometime (the GIT version is better but there are still a cases remaining). Is there a command in Windows to put something in %PATH%? How do things normally install? Whenever I've tried using Windows, installing things always required fiddling about with Start -> Control panel -> System -> Advanced -> Environment Variables -> Path. Here are my notes from last time I tried it: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2029407&group_id=76468&atid=547194 -- Dr Thomas Leonard ROX desktop / Zero Install GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |