From: Alex A. <cir...@gm...> - 2008-04-03 02:14:03
|
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Tony Houghton <h...@re...> wrote: > In <cd5...@ma...> > > "Thomas Leonard" <ta...@gm...> wrote: > > > > I'm still not quite clear on whether it's publishing metadata or > > running 0launch you object to, but if you don't mind running it, this > > will let you create binaries that don't depend on recent library > > versions (or on Zero Install): > > I could publish meta data OK I suppose, but I don't want to run 0install > so I wouldn't be able to test the metadata. > > > > Maybe it should get a different name? I don't know. I feel sure there > > must be a decent session manager out there we can just use, but I have > > to admit that gnome-session is pretty poor and is starting to > > seriously annoy me[*]. > > I tried using gnome-session for a while too after reading your article, > and soon got fed up with it. Have you tried or considered xfce4-session? I actually use mostly XFCE on my computer, but have replaced the desktop and filer with ROX. If I could get ROX control panels integrated into xfce-mcs-manager, then I would try to release a DE based on this idea. - Alex -- - Alex Austin Circuitsoft Computer Services (651) 238-9273 www.circuitsoftcs.com "...and then I visited Wikipedia ...and the next 8 hours are a blur." |