[rox-devel] [Patch] More 64-bit patches

[Tony H. <h...@re...>]

I missed some of the things that needed doing in my last patch for
OroboROX, so here's a replacement. ROX-Filer had one or two similar bugs
and printf format warnings so here's a patch for that too. While sifting
the warnings (gcc 3.4 probably catches more than its predecessors) I
also spotted it was testing the address of a function instead of whether
a flag was set which I'm pretty sure must have been a typo. Check the
penultimate hunk in the patch.

-- 
TH * http://www.realh.co.uk