From: Thomas L. <ta...@ec...> - 2006-06-19 19:48:00
|
On Sat, 17 Jun 2006 19:21:51 +0200, Przemyslaw Gawronski wrote: > Hi > >> Could you be more specific? Are existing thumbnails still visible? > > Yes they were, but I've deleted the folder ~/.thumbnails to see what > will happen, so now they don't (naturally). > >> Do new ones get generated, but not displayed (check ~/.thumbnails)? > > I've checked that they are generated in to ~/.thumbnails/normal folder. So, if ROX-Filer tries to create them then they appear in the 'normal' directory in the cache, but they don't appear in the filer window for the image file? Can you load the thumbnail images into Gimp, etc? >> Are errors produced? > > I didn't see any messages, maybe a log file I should look for ? > > If I do "Save as" in gimp (to make second copy of some image) it > produces a thumbnail that is visible in rox. > > Thanks > > Przemek > > PS. If I change to GNOME I also for some reason don't see thumbnails :-( Maybe something changed in the way GTK writes png files? Try looking at the meta data for ROX-Filer-created thumbnails vs Gimp-created ones. There's a 'pngmeta' package on Debian that might be helpful, but my APT is broken so I can't check it at the moment ("basic_string::_S_construct NULL not valid" should win some kind of cryptic-error-message award; if anyone knows how to fix this, let me know!). -- Dr Thomas Leonard http://rox.sourceforge.net GPG: 9242 9807 C985 3C07 44A6 8B9A AE07 8280 59A5 3CC1 |