From: Stephen W. <st...@ke...> - 2005-10-27 17:25:04
|
Keith Warno <kr...@va...> wrote: > > Correction, for clarity: It is not ignored *all the time*. :) Seems to > be ignored for file types that shouldn't normally be executable (how > many of you have an executable JPEG?). Honesty I think this is lame. > If an execute bit is set, regardless of file name, it should be honored > and I agree w/ Brandin on this. ROX-Filer should not be going out of > its way to fix a mount flaw. I've already argued this with Thomas, see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.desktop.rox.devel/7241 and the replies. -- Stephen Watson http://www.kerofin.demon.co.uk/ If you read this on a mailing list, send any reply back to the list and not to me. Not even CC. Strange as I seem I'm getting stranger by the minute |