Re: [rox-users] Updated injector-packaging tutorial (Find)

[Ken H. <ke...@ha...>]

Guillaume Lovet wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:33:44 +0200, Ken Hayber <ke...@ha...> wrote:
> 
>> Well the apps themselves haven't changed in a while.  So I guess that  
>> would indicate nothing wrong about
>> 0install, but some other issues in your general setup.  Have you run  
>> any/all of the above before?
> 
> 
> Nope, I'm a 0install activist: I refuse to run any Rox-app that was not  
> packaged for 0install ;)
> j/k, actually I haven't needed for them so far. I just wanted to help 
> test  the injector / your packaging.

Thanks, but I did all this hard work just for you 0install fanatics anyway, so you're only helping yourself. ;)

>> My .DirIcons are svg - so your first message indicates to me that 
>> your  gtk doesn't support svg.  The
>> simplest thing to do is replace them with png files of your choosing 
>> -  the icons from my www pages would
>> be fine.
> 
> 
> Well it works, which makes me raise a question about the injector: as I  
> understood it, 0launch should refuse to start the app, since the 
> directory  SHA1 hash should differ after tampering (I overwrote the 
> .DirIcon in the  cache). Shouldn't it?
> 
>> The second one seems to indicate you need a newer version of ROX-Lib2.
> 
> 
> That's an issue then: the Rox-Lib2 used in that case is supposed to be 
> the  one that your interface is pointing to, and is fetched by the 
> injector,  isn't it?

There is nothing in the interface which specifies _which_ version of ROX-Lib to use.  Isn't this a missing but needed feature Thomas?