From: Stephen W. <st...@ke...> - 2003-09-18 13:50:34
|
Thomas Leonard <ta...@ec...> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 01:13:10PM +0100, Stephen Watson wrote: > > > > Free Space I thought a user defined program (FreeFS being one choice), > > > falling back on df in an xterm. > > > > Just went into CVS. > > OK. We can probably do a better default (eg, one that stays up to date). > Also, it should be disabled if the fs is unmounted. > > The remote stuff doesn't look so good, though. Apart from having 'rox' > spit out a load of XML whenever you run it, Damn, didn't spot that. > passing internal pointers to > external apps is a really bad idea (if the window is closed, the app might > start messing with some other window, etc). If the memory system decides to re-use that pointer. Which is possible I suppose. > A better idea might be to pass a unique ID *into* the filer and have it > store it on the window. The ID can then be truely unique (process ID, > time-stamp, etc) and we don't have to return anything... > > It's also easier for scripts, since you can just name the window, rather > than having to parse XML... Makes more sense. Use a GHashTable to store the ID's? -- Stephen Watson http://www.kerofin.demon.co.uk/ I woke up and I had a big idea/To buy a new soul at the start of every year I paid up and it cost me pretty dear/Here's a hymn to those that disappear |