From: Gopala K. <kri...@gm...> - 2006-07-07 15:08:40
|
Hello all, I have been checking ot qucs code for the last 4 days. I decided to improve the GUI. First thing: I found was that the left hand window is not dockwidget , that is it isn't moveable(dockable). Also I decided to implement vertical tab widget for the Projects,Components.. tabs as in KDE. Second thing: To enable scalability (PCB support etc.) I also feel that the layout of the classes (functions,objects,classes) should be changed.What I mean is addition of few helper classes and restructuring of few GUI classes needs to be done. This can easily help for future additions. I am ready to work on these after your responses. I would like your suggestions and comments. Thanks for all the contributors of qucs for this nice software which helped me fetch good score in my board exams and improved my electronics knowledge |
From: <Mic...@al...> - 2006-07-10 06:34:42
|
> Hello all, Hello to you, > I have been checking ot qucs code for the last 4 days. I decided to > improve the GUI. > First thing: > I found was that the left hand window is not dockwidget , that is it > isn't moveable(dockable). I have never thought that to be necessary, but as you sent already the code in your other e-mail, I will test it. Thanks! > Also I decided to implement vertical tab > widget for the Projects,Components.. tabs as in KDE. Indeed, this is not a bad idea. To be honest I didn't know that this is possible with Qt. If you can send the code, there is a good chance that it will go into the official Qucs versions. > Second thing: > To enable scalability (PCB support etc.) I also feel that the layout of > the classes (functions,objects,classes) should be changed.What I mean > is addition of few helper classes and restructuring of few GUI classes > needs to be done. > This can easily help for future additions. I have some restructuring on my todo list, but you seems to have something different in mind. Can you explain more precisely what you mean ? How much work will that be ? I must admit that my code is not that good structured, mostly because of historical reasons. > I am ready to work on these after your responses. I would like your > suggestions and comments. Improvements and contributions are always welcome! But, of course I cannot guarantee to take these things without knowing exactly what they are. How much would you like to do for Qucs ? Would you like to write a "small" PCB layout windows ? > Thanks for all the contributors of qucs for this nice software which > helped me fetch good score in my board exams and improved my > electronics knowledge Thanks for your help. I am happy that you like Qucs :-) Regards, Michael |