From: Rafael L. <lab...@ps...> - 2003-10-13 21:38:02
|
* Alan W. Irwin <ai...@us...> [2003-10-13 14:03]: > "try hard" is fine with me as was already clear from my remarks. > > OTOH "no backwards incompatibility ever allowed under any circumstances" > would be a disaster in my opinion. Each case has to be decided on its > merits rather than on some blanket prohibition. Okay, you are picky about the "at any price" expression that I used. Remember that English is not my mother tongue and I misuse the language from time to time. "try hard" is what I meant, I never intended to mean prohibition. Why do you North-americans have a so low acceptance threshold with our poor chicken English? :-) -- Rafael |