From: Rafael L. <lab...@ps...> - 2003-09-24 06:17:52
|
* Alan W. Irwin <ir...@be...> [2003-09-23 15:04]: > I have had (third) thoughts also. For example, even if technically feasible > it may violate the Linux standards base file hierarchy standard to put a > full library (not just a shared object plugin) under > /usr/lib/plplot$version. Maybe the best thing to do is to accept that we > now are in charge of a fork of libnn and libcsa, and we should name them > accordingly as libplplotnn and libplplotcsa in /usr/lib (or more accurately > $prefix/lib). I also think that this is the best solution, either than prefixing with csiro or sakov. We must be only sure that this is allowed by the upstream licensing terms (or ask the upstream author for authorisation). -- Rafael |