Re: [Plplot-devel] documentation license

[Rafael L. <lab...@ps...>]

* Alan W. Irwin <ir...@be...> [2003-08-12 17:27]:

> I have been following up with Maurice and Geoffrey about the documentation
> license issue.  Here is Geoffrey's response which has also been specifically
> endorsed by Maurice:
> 
> *********
> "I am currently way too busy to get into a documentation license brouhaha.
> Maurice and I both wanted the documentation to be customizable and
> republishable by any organization which employed the code.  Any documentation
> licensing terms which, in the considered opinion of the other PLplot
> developers/stakeholders, provides this capability, is okay with me."
> *********
> 
> Once I hear from Rafael and Joao (the other copyright holders for the
> documentation) I think we can put this issue to rest since in my opinion the
> second form of documentation license conditions satisfies G&M's request
> exactly which allows us to remove the first form that is inconsistent with
> the second form.

I share Alan's feelings here.  I think that the second license conditions
and the G&M's request are compatible.  We might though ask the people in
deb...@li... mailing list.  Should I contact them?

-- 
Rafael