From: Alan W. I. <ir...@be...> - 2015-04-18 17:49:20
|
On 2015-04-18 13:08-0000 Arjen Markus wrote: > Hi Alan, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@be...] >> >> Does this new robust logic for Windows detection now work for you? (To make this >> test of PATH manipulation much faster for our three main configurations [shared, >> nondynamic, and static], I suggest you temporarily edit script.txt to drop all tests >> other than the test_noninteractive one in both the build tree and installed examples >> tree, using >> >> --do_ctest no >> --do_test_interactive no >> --do_test_traditional_install_tree no >> >> Please send back a full report (preferably with automatically generated tarball, see >> above) whether this test succeeds or not. >> > I used the new logic and it seems to have worked up to some point. See the attached tarball. The shared configuration worked fine, but the tests failed on the nondynamic one. (Not automated yet, but that is going to be my next step) When rewriting this PATH manipulation logic after the 5.11.0 release I screwed up one aspect (forgot the nondynamic case), and your test found that script bug. Sorry about that! Please try again (for commit id c689ff3 which fixes this issue). Regardless of success or failure, full report please. Alan __________________________ Alan W. Irwin Astronomical research affiliation with Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria (astrowww.phys.uvic.ca). Programming affiliations with the FreeEOS equation-of-state implementation for stellar interiors (freeeos.sf.net); the Time Ephemerides project (timeephem.sf.net); PLplot scientific plotting software package (plplot.sf.net); the libLASi project (unifont.org/lasi); the Loads of Linux Links project (loll.sf.net); and the Linux Brochure Project (lbproject.sf.net). __________________________ Linux-powered Science __________________________ |