From: Arjen M. <arj...@wl...> - 2008-03-20 07:29:02
|
Andrew Ross wrote: >Arjen, > >I guess this is an issue with gcc 3.4.4 being tighter with type >checking. No-one else has yet reported it. I assume the problem is that >the compiler doesn't know whether to interpret 1 as a PLINT or a bool. >To my mind it is definitely an int. (bool should either be true or >false). Anyway, the C++ example now uses true rather than 1 in the call >plshades. Does this fix your problem? > > > Hi Andrew, the change to "true" did indeed do the trick - g++/gcc is now perfectly happy to compile the example. Regards, Arjen |