From: Michael M. T. <mt...@ma...> - 2007-09-28 15:18:43
|
Dear Arjen: I just got around to check the F95 binding of the latest SVN release. Everything is fine! The characters now display correctly for the F95 examples. In the file binding/f95/Makefile I had to add the '--tag=F77' option in the two lines so that they look: ... $(LIBTOOL) --tag=F77 --mode=compile ... ... $(LIBTOOL) --tag=F77 --mode=link ... I have been testing with a NAGWare Fortran 95 compiler and will also try out the Absoft F95 compiler. Many thanks again. Best, Mike Arjen Markus [arj...@wl...] wrote: > Hello, > > in view of the recent report on problems with EQUIVALENCE'ing > integers and character strings in the Fortran 95 bindings, I have > changed the implementation. Instead of an EQUIVALENCE > statement the transfer of character data from Fortran routines > to C functions now goes via the TRANSFER() function. > > As this is completely standard in Fortran 95, the bindings should now > be acceptable for all Fortran 95 compilers. > > I have tested this new implementation with the various examples > and they all work fine. It is possible, however, that one or two > functions are not exercised that way or that I have overlooked > something. So, please report any strange results. > > To use this new implementation, update the sources from SVN. > > Regards, > > Arjen -- |