From: Andrew R. <and...@us...> - 2006-05-16 07:27:44
|
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 08:13:07PM -0700, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > > Of course, these small PLplot patches and the CVS version of libtool have > nothing to do with our forthcoming release, but still I agree with Andrew's > argument that the commercial fortran compiler issues that we currently have > are important to fix, and I am curious if the latest CVS version of libtool > along with the attached patches will do that. So, Andrew, I hope you give > ifort and pgf90 a try with CVS libtool and patched PLplot. Alan, The ifort issues turn out not to be libtool problems. With libtool 1.5.22 I can get ifort to work provided I either - rename all .f95 files to .f90. or - I force the Makefile to use the -FR -Tf options for ifort. Note that -FR forces free-form source files while -Tf forces the following source file to be assumed to be fortran, irrespective of the file extension. Note that -Tf must appear directly before the source file name. With one of these changes all the bindings and example compile without problems. Alan, which approach do you prefer? If it is the latter, does anyone have any recommendations as to the best way to achieve this, particularly to ensure -Tf is followed by the source file name. ifort did uncover a bug in sfstubsf95.f95 with plfill3, now corrected in CVS. I will now test with pgf90. Andrew |