From: Koen v. d. D. <kvd...@ea...> - 2004-03-27 13:21:07
|
On Mar 27, 2004, at 2:36 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: > I > suggest you try the gcc command by hand, but tack on the python library > /sw/lib/python2.3/config/libpython2.3.dylib at the end of the command > line. > I keep getting the same error each time I run make (after running the gcc command). Just to be sure, The gcc command looks like this: gcc -o .libs/UNDERSCORE_plplotcmodule.so -bundle .libs/plplotcmodule_double.o /Volumes/MoreStuff/.src/plplot-5.3.0.cvs.20040324-11/plplot -5.3.0.cvs.20040324/lib/nn/.libs/libcsironn.dylib /Volumes/MoreStuff/.src/plplot-5.3.0.cvs.20040324-11/plplot -5.3.0.cvs.20040324/lib/csa/.libs/libcsirocsa.dylib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -L/sw/lib ../../src/.libs/libplplotd.dylib -lm /sw/lib/python2.3/config/libython2.3.dylib I also tried -L/sw/lib/python2.3/config/libython2.3.dylib at the end, but that gave the same error immediately in the gcc command. > If that works, you will have to run make again to finish off the rest > of > the build from the top-level directory. The subsequent make install > there > will almost surely run into the same missing library problem for the > gcc Now this is new. I don't recall from your instructions to run make install within bindings/python. Was I supposed to do that? If so, I can try that later today or tomorrow. > So if you are similarly curious, then I > would appreciate this extra test, but if not that is fine as well. My > besetting sin is too much curiosity.... :-) I don't mind running some more tests, but you will have to hold my hand through all the steps :-) - Koen. |