From: Rafael L. <rla...@us...> - 2004-02-19 20:23:52
|
* Alan W. Irwin <ir...@be...> [2004-02-19 11:44]: > On 2004-02-17 15:03-0800 SourceForge.net wrote: > > > Patches item #899167, was opened at 2004-02-17 15:03 > > Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter > > You can respond by visiting: > > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=302915&aid=899167&group_id=2915 > > > > Nobody else has commented so I will. > > This anonymous donor has used some powerful swig knowledge to get the > defined plshades logic partially working on python. This is an informative > exercise (especially about swig issues), but I have decided to store but > not use this patch in its present form. > > The problem is the "defined" C API is not settled for plshade and plshades. > Maurice came through with an ideal design long ago, but it was never > implemented. So I don't want to propagate the current half-assed version > to the python API for PLplot. > > But if we ever decide to clean up the C API for the defined logic of > plshade and plshades, then it looks (from this patch) that I can quickly > follow with the equivalent python API. Could you please add your comment above to the Patch Tracker at SF? -- Rafael |