From: Jordi <mu...@gm...> - 2007-12-14 03:47:20
|
May I suggest to review the already contributed patches? In the tracking system there are patches sitting there more than 2 years. I guess they not longer apply to 2.1 or were already applied but maybe not. As occasional contributor to several projects, I know the feeling of writing a patch and be ignored. The number of open old patches in the tracking system tend to show the chances you have to be ignored and tend to scare contributors. I am not arguing that playerstage has a problem. I only argue that taking care of people's patches even just to close them as not applicable, encourage new contributors. On Dec 14, 2007 8:17 AM, Brian Gerkey <br...@ge...> wrote: > Two releases have been made from the 2.1.x line (i.e., from CVS HEAD): > > Player 2.1.0rc1 > Stage 2.1.0rc1 > > Get them from the usual spot: > > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42445 > > As the names suggest, these are release candidates. Given how much > of the internals of Player have changed between 2.0.x and 2.1.x, we > expect a few bugs to be hiding, particularly in the lesser-used > drivers. The idea is to get folks to try out this new code and > report bugs (preferably with patches to fix them). Please help! > -- Jordi Polo Carres Natural language processing laboratory NAIST http://www.bahasara.org |